Not much there, except lying about the negative reviews (its the segment itself that gets a mixed review, not the watch whose reviews have been generally pretty positive), piling on more FUD on the numbers and then saying that's IDC equally unsubstantiated numbers somehow proves that Apple is not doing as bad as those fake rumors (hey, we've got the best fake numbers...). Oh, they threw in bone with his "meets expectations" quote and then let the IDC guy continue selling his crap.
The end is mildly positive to Apple, but the initial setup premise in the article garbage and shouldn't even have been reported; and that's coming from a major newspaper. No wonder trash heap reporting sites like The Verge broadcast FUD all day long.