Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
63,553
30,881



Popular API documentation browser Dash was yesterday pulled from the App Store after a routine migration request. Dash developer Bogdan Popescu was given no explanation for why the app had been pulled aside from "fraudulent conduct," but after a conversation with Apple, he's been accused of manipulating App Store reviews.

Popescu received a "Notice of Termination" email yesterday and his iTunes Connect account was shut down. Apple initially declined to offer more information, but after Dash's App Store removal started making headlines, Apple told Popescu it was due to App Store review manipulation, such as paying for positive reviews, something he denies doing.

dashapp-800x471.jpg
Update: Apple contacted me and told me they found evidence of App Store review manipulation. This is something I've never done.

Apple's decision is final and can't be appealed.
Despite Popescu's denial, Apple appears to be adamant that some sort of fraud took place. Apple's marketing chief Phil Schiller has stepped in and commented on the situation, through an email sent to Matthew Els, who asked him about the situation.
Hi Matthew,

Thanks for your email about this app.

I did look into this situation when I read about it today. I am told this app was removed due to repeated fraudulent activity.

We often terminate developer accounts for ratings and review fraud, including actions designed to hurt other developers. This is a responsibility that we take very seriously, on behalf of all of our customers and developers.

I hope that you understand the importance of protecting the App Store from repeated fraudulent activity.

Thank you,
Phil
At this time, Popescu says that Apple's decision is final and the app will not be returned to the App Store. The developer community seems to be surprised by the accusation, with many calling Dash a quality app that wouldn't have needed to boost its reviews.

@marcoarment @stroughtonsmith You see how many people now write good things about Dash? Busted. :) - Jacob Gorban (@jacobgorban) October 6, 2016
It's not clear what's going on, and the App Store reviews for Dash are no longer visible as the app has been pulled. As developer Steven Troughton-Smith points out, if Popescu didn't manipulate his own reviews, it's possible he's been targeted maliciously by a third party or that Apple's flagging system made a mistake. With Apple's Phil Schiller having looked into the situation, the latter option seems unlikely.

Dash by @kapeli is used by thousands of devs and has been for years. I use it myself for my iOS reviews. They don't need to buy reviews...? - Federico Viticci (@viticci) October 6, 2016
Dash for Mac remains available outside of the Mac App Store, and Popescu is encouraging Dash for Mac users to migrate from the Mac App Store version. It is unclear if the iOS version will be reinstated.

Article Link: 'Dash' App Removed From App Store for Alleged Review Manipulation
 

KALLT

macrumors 603
Sep 23, 2008
5,361
3,378
It seems to have disappeared from my purchase history completely.
 

nagromme

macrumors G5
May 2, 2002
12,546
1,196
Speculation: maybe they used a bulk review/rating service, or a marketing service that includes that, and then when Apple was able to detect that kind of bulk, all of that service's clients got canned? (Probably not just this one.)

Review spam and fake ratings are certainly a huge problem for App Store users, and I am not 100% certain that second chances are the way to go: then it's "may as well try the spam, no harm done if we're caught!" It's not as if there haven't been warnings against this for years.

Now, IF it's a straight-up error and this company never used ANY such methods, I hope the error is corrected (as Apple generally does with their review/removal errors, though the remedy gets less blog attention than the initial Godwin's Law hysteria). Seems like a worthwhile app that need not game the system, and Apple can have a stated "no second chance" policy, but they can ALSO bend their decisions when called for. It happens.

And if some fraudulent marketing company tricked this developer into not knowing what they were signing up to receive, I hope the dev can make a legal case against them.

Similarly, if an attacker is behind this, taking actions PRETENDING to be this dev, I hope that comes to light (and it probably will, because this won't be the only victim). I find that sadly plausible.

We may never know the facts. Won't stop us jumping to conclusions :)
 

MRrainer

macrumors 68000
Aug 8, 2008
1,524
1,095
Zurich, Switzerland
Hmm... so if I hire a 3rd party to post fake reviews to a competitor's app.......


That may quickly backfire.
Imagine trying to hire a killer for your wife on craigslist (or on the dark-net, if you're not a total moron).
I believe the FBI has rooms full of people that answer to these requests...
And even if you manage to find a contractor that isn't a fed, what are the chances that he just doesn't rat you out - first to your competitor and then to the feds. After you've paid, of course?
 

BrianKonarsMac

macrumors 65816
Apr 28, 2004
1,102
83
Hmm... so if I hire a 3rd party to post fake reviews to a competitor's app.......
This was the first thought that popped into my head as well. Fake reviews are quite cheap, and if you can essentially destroy your competition for pennies on the dollar through this... what stops you aside from personal ethics? Apparently there is no appeal process per Apple, so once you get hit you're done.
 

redscull

macrumors 6502a
Jul 1, 2010
849
832
Texas
We often terminate developer accounts for ratings and review fraud, including actions designed to hurt other developers. This is a responsibility that we take very seriously, on behalf of all of our customers and developers.
Unless of course you pay Apple. Because that's basically what paid ad spots are in App Store search results.
 

philosopherdog

macrumors 6502a
Dec 29, 2008
737
517
I'm sure if he's innocent Apple will reverse the decision. I certainly hope they work it out because this is an important app many developers rely on. Not such a problem on the mac as iOS.
 

bitslap47

macrumors 6502a
Jul 9, 2007
634
353
That may quickly backfire.
Imagine trying to hire a killer for your wife on craigslist (or on the dark-net, if you're not a total moron).
I believe the FBI has rooms full of people that answer to these requests...
And even if you manage to find a contractor that isn't a fed, what are the chances that he just doesn't rat you out - first to your competitor and then to the feds. After you've paid, of course?

Fair enough.

So what if I own some domains, I create 100's of email addresses, create associated iTunes accounts, then review a competitor's app from each.

I see your point, but I'm just playing Devil's advocate here. Apple's "detection" methods may be flawed. I mean... do they have proof beyond the circumstantial?

The reviews may be fake, but how do they know the developer initiated it? Maybe a friend thought he was being nice?
 

nt5672

macrumors 68040
Jun 30, 2007
3,336
7,045
Midwest USA
Yep, no proof, no followup, no communications, no freedom, no fair chance, and not innocent, till proven guilty.

Why not just remove the fraudulent reviews and stop future fraudulent reviews. Will the answer is that Apple is too big to give a ****. But at some point, as the saying goes, since power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely it will continue to get out of hand until people quit buying from Apple. And that is one major reason for all of the negative comments on Apple here in MacRumors. You don't hear about it, but most developers have been subjected to this attitude one time or another, without one bit of malicious intent.
 
Last edited:

turbineseaplane

macrumors G5
Mar 19, 2008
14,774
31,530
This sort of stuff is precisely the worst part of a single gatekeeper to an App ecosystem / Place to earn your living.

The Mac still has the huge edge here vs iOS (for now....yikes)

If the Mac ever goes completely locked down like iOS, I'm pretty sure I'll have to leave. I just don't need or care for this level of dictatorship over an entire software platform. Just my personal preference.
 

keysofanxiety

macrumors G3
Nov 23, 2011
9,539
25,302
Hmm...for an app that's so generally well regarded in the developer community, I really don't think this would have been a whimsical decision by Apple.

Especially if Phil looked into this personally, he'd have known the media fallout and confusion from this. Plus I don't just think it's a case of a competitor hiring fake reviews on his app — Apple would definitely have considered and looked into that.

Now, the email from Phil said: "including actions designed to hurt other developers". What if we're looking at this the wrong way? What if he was hiring bots to spam bad reviews on competitors' products?

There's something they're not telling us. The more I think about it, the more of a mystery it's becoming.
 

nt5672

macrumors 68040
Jun 30, 2007
3,336
7,045
Midwest USA
I'm sure if he's innocent Apple will reverse the decision. I certainly hope they work it out because this is an important app many developers rely on. Not such a problem on the mac as iOS.

I know for a fact being right does not have anything to do with it. Publicity is the only thing that works. In my case the issue was permission to use intellectual property that was ruled not protected by a judge with no appeals in over 8 years. But to Apple nope, it was protected, can't use. I could not even find out who made the decision. I appealed, an hour later appeal denied.
 

pmjoe

macrumors 6502
Mar 27, 2009
468
36
Hmm... so if I hire a 3rd party to post fake reviews to a competitor's app.......
Presumably "review manipulation" for your own product would be in the form of positive reviews, so hiring a 3rd party to post fake POSITIVE reviews to competitor's app, hoping Apple would notice, would be a bit bizarre.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.