Developer guide: QuickTime video playback on the iPod's scr...

Discussion in 'MacBytes.com News Discussion' started by MacBytes, Jul 2, 2004.

  1. macrumors bot

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2003
  2. Administrator emeritus

    Mudbug

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2002
    Location:
    North Central Colorado
    #2
    upon downloading and reading the attached .pdf to this story, the first thing that comes to my mind is "A SLIMMED DOWN VERSION OF OS X?" Then question 2 is if the system has been "closed" this whole time, why open it now, for this?
     
  3. macrumors 68020

    idkew

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2001
    Location:
    where the concrete to dirt ratio is better
    #3
    agreed mud. i was under the impression that the OS was NOT written by apple. those copyrights in About had some part in convincing me of this.
     
  4. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2003
    Location:
    Akron, OH
    #4
    woah, no where can I download that app? I'm to lazy to create my own... :p
     
  5. Moderator emeritus

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2002
    Location:
    Gone but not forgotten.
    #5
    Mainly because there was the impression since Pixo was acquired by Sun Microsystems that Sun now had control of iPod development.

    Apple wanted to convince developers that it could replace the Pixo imaging layer at any point and the iPod would still be a viable development target.
     
  6. macrumors G5

    nagromme

    Joined:
    May 2, 2002
    #6
    "As we’ll see, the iPod does rely on some Pixo software, but that software is just a thin layer of imaging software, not the entire operating system. The Pixo software handles screen drawing and item selection, but not much more. In a nutshell, Pixo’s software is to the iPod as QuickDraw was to the original Macintosh: a key element, perhaps, but not nearly the whole enchilada. And, more importantly, the Pixo software in the iPod is likely to be phased out in the future, just as QuickDraw is being phased out in favor of Mac OS X’s Quartz imaging layer."

    Anyway, it's cool that people can now write new iPod apps... but I thought it was a hoax at first from the acronym SNOJOB :)
     
  7. Moderator emeritus

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2002
    Location:
    Gone but not forgotten.
    #7
    I felt the same way about SNOBOL when I first saw the name way back when. I'm surprised that it's actually still going strong after so many years.
     
  8. macrumors G5

    nagromme

    Joined:
    May 2, 2002
    #8
    What's really cool is that the example app is added right to the iPod's UI/menu system. Very clean. And installation is easy, you just drop your code into the Extras folder! (Tricky part: Apple uses ROT13 to confuse us! :) )
     
  9. macrumors 68020

    mainstreetmark

    Joined:
    May 7, 2003
    Location:
    Saint Augustine, FL
    #9
    Well, crap! This may derail my valiant attempts to get Obj C all into my brain. I wish they'd provide the sourcecode in it's entirety so I could actually get this thing onto my iPod without (*shutter*) typing it in manually.
     
  10. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2003
    #10
    me 2!

    i sent an email to the author, asking him if he had this, or an easy to use installer....

    no reply yet..
     
  11. Moderator emeritus

    kainjow

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2000
    #11
    Hm he must not be using 10.3.3 because when he does "ls -laf" on /Volumes/iPod/iPod_Control/Device, he gets a lot more in that directory then I do. I don't get any of the "dev" or "mach" things.. maybe he's not running latest iPod fireware? To me it sounds like this could easily be blocked in the next firmware update. Looks very very interesting though....just wish I could see the files in the Device folder :(
     
  12. bdb
    macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2004
    #12
    Color me skeptical

    I'm not quite believing it. For one, Google shows nothing for SNOJOB, the Mac Tech April 2004 article list (http://www.mactech.com/news/archive.mgi?archiveID=42004) does not include the article, and April is Fool's Day month. It would be so cool if it were true, but I'm currently doubting it.
     
  13. macrumors 68020

    mainstreetmark

    Joined:
    May 7, 2003
    Location:
    Saint Augustine, FL
    #13
    Why would you doubt it? It doesn't seem like someone would write a 12-page PDF with a fictional language as a joke.

    and I know iPod can display images, as I've played breakout and sabatage (uh, "parachute") on it.

    And, per Mudbug, how come this isn't more widely known? Why are there only two games, anyways...
     
  14. macrumors member

    invalidname

    Joined:
    May 1, 2003
    Location:
    Grand Rapids, MI
    #14
    April Fool's

    Folks, this is from Tim Monroe's QuickTime column in the April issue of MacTech.

    Let me make that clear. The April issue of MacTech.

    From the author who last year claimed to have received a CD from Microsoft that included a run-anywhere QuickTime library that worked on everything from Longhorn to the PocketPC.

    About a language that has been dead for at least 25 years.

    You've been had.

    BTW, I talked to Tim at WWDC and he was floored by how many people fell for it, though to be fair, the April issue of MacTech shipped in mid-June, so readers weren't on their toes.

    -invalidname
     
  15. macrumors 603

    whooleytoo

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2002
    Location:
    Cork, Ireland.
    #15
    You have no idea how pished off I am at this.....grr... :mad:

    An iPod SDK was #1 on my wishlist for WWDC! Any hope Tim might take notice of all the publicity this is generating, and start a discussion about opening this up?
     
  16. macrumors G5

    nagromme

    Joined:
    May 2, 2002
    #16
    And why would it include detailed code snippets and notes, but no actual jokes in it? Even the language SNOBOL is apparently real. In the end I fell for the hoax--but then again, it's July...

    My first instinct was correct I guess--very disappointing. iPodLounge has the headline too, and doesn't yet know it's a hoax but it sounds that way from the comments.

    To my credit, I did NOT fall for those fake Dashboard shots :D
     

Share This Page