Dimensions of new nano vs old nano

Discussion in 'iPod' started by RMcolder, Sep 6, 2007.

  1. macrumors newbie

    Nov 8, 2003
    Can any one post a comparison of l x w x h of the old vs new nano? Also, superimposed image of one on the other would give a great idea of what has changed physically. I would appreciate it and I am sure others would as well. Hope everyone is happy with the new ipods!
  2. macrumors newbie

    Aug 3, 2007
    Northern Virginia
    The basic specs work out like this:

    2g Ipod Nano

    Height: 3.5"
    Width: 1.6"
    Depth: .27"
    Weight: 1.5 oz. with battery
    Screen: 1.5-inch (diagonal) color LCD with LED backlight\
    Battery: Up to 14 hours of music playback; up to 4 hours of slideshows with music

    Full Specs from Apple

    3g Ipod Nano

    Height: 2.75"
    Width: 2.06"
    Depth: .26"
    Weight: 1.74 oz. with battery
    Screen: 2-inch (diagonal) liquid crystal display with blue-white LED backlight
    Battery: Up to 24 hours music playback; Up to 5 hours video playback

    Full Specs from Apple

    So the big differences are height, width and weight; the obvious screen upgrade; and a better battery life.
  3. macrumors 68000


    Jun 16, 2007
    is it so hard to just go for one minute to the tech page of apple?? do you need to start a whole thread for that ?
  4. macrumors G3


    Mar 20, 2003
    San Francisco
    I thought the old nano had 24 hours battery life too. I remember some thing about it on the nano page ("what can you do in 24 hours" kind of thing).
  5. macrumors newbie

    Aug 3, 2007
    Northern Virginia
    I got the specs from apple... maybe they were from the original nano rather than the 2g?
  6. Moderator


    Staff Member

    Sep 2, 2004
    The Centennial State
    A picture really is worth a thousand words:

    Attached Files:

  7. thread starter macrumors newbie

    Nov 8, 2003
    Thanks so Much!

    Thanks so much Dejo! Demi-God for sure but you are working your way up!
    It is really helpful and I think others benefit as well.

    No need to be so critical lofight. I am sure you found dejo's post useful as well, that is, if you gave the thread a chance instead of immediately disregarding it.

    Have a good day everyone!

Share This Page