Ditching my TV for a mac, can i play my consoles?

Discussion in 'Mac Basics and Help' started by 7084, Sep 7, 2006.

  1. 7084 macrumors member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2006
    #1
    Ok, so my aim is to only have one screen in my room, as my piddly little 14" TV will not be able to compete with the hopeful purchase of one of these 24" beasts.

    Now, digital tv is pretty straight forward it seems, as I'm only after the freeview channels and there seem to be lots of options available for that purpose. Consoles on the other hand... I'm not so sure about...

    I'm in the UK by the way...

    With no video-in capabilities whatsoever on the mac i almost gave up hope, until i spotted this USB TV tuner for mac, as well as supporting digital TV, it claims to also support all current and next gen consoles with minimal latency via analogue.

    Not ever having tried one of these devices before, I wonder if anyone a bit more tech savvy might know something about them?

    Ok, so it seems S-video is the best connection i can get. Obviously i'm not going for HD quality here, but will this look awful on my monitor? Worse than on my 14" screen, RGB connected consoles? Will no PAL 60hz option be shooting myself in the foot for future releases (Aim to get at least a Wii, if not a PS3 at a later stage, and already own a GC and PS2)?

    Also the claim of no latency is a big one, will i be mis-timing jumps and so forth as I wait for the picture on my screen to catch up with the game?

    Anyway, I know theres a lot of questions there, and i'd be grateful to anyone who could shed a little light onto the subject.

    Cheers

    7084
     
  2. Scarlet Fever macrumors 68040

    Scarlet Fever

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2005
    Location:
    Bookshop!
    #2
    Looks like you have already researched, and have found a good product.

    Elgato seem to make good video/TV solutions for the mac. If they claim it works with low latency, i would believe them. Maybe go into a shop and ask if you can have one demoed. Sounds like it might be a popular topic, so report back with results! :)
     
  3. asphalt-proof macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2003
    Location:
    Magrathea
    #3
    This seems like an excellent solution. They made a similar device but it looks like has been discontinued. Anyway, the other device also worked very well and had good reviews from those that used it. Good luck and let us know how it works for you. I'm curious because this is the same setup I will do in my home: 24" of iMac goodness, xbox and TV in my bedroom. Can't wait!!
     
  4. Mac Rules macrumors 6502

    Mac Rules

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2006
    Location:
    Switzerland
    #4
    I'm liking this... FYI, S-video is capable of resolutions up to 1080i, so HD gaming is fully p[ossible, and the iMac should have no probs showing it, so roll on the PS3!!

    Cheers
     
  5. i.Feature macrumors 6502

    i.Feature

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2005
    Location:
    Montreal, Canada
    #5
    I'm not quite sure this is true. S Video is an analog video cable and is only capable of 480i or 576i resolution. Great quality analog, but still analog.

    Please someone correct me if i'm wrong. Don't want to be giving out false info.
     
  6. Mac Rules macrumors 6502

    Mac Rules

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2006
    Location:
    Switzerland
    #6
    Sorry, you're right, I got confused, Component Cables can carry a 1080i signal, there must be some kind of adapter to fit the USB TV in things for the iMac?....

    Cheers
     
  7. i.Feature macrumors 6502

    i.Feature

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2005
    Location:
    Montreal, Canada
    #7
    No worries. Happens to me all the time. But its still early enough in the morning here. Whats your excuse.
    :D :p
     
  8. 7084 thread starter macrumors member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2006
    #8
    Thanks for the replies guys, it seems that you all think this will be a reasonable solution, even though it does seem like the ONLY solution out there lol.

    Won't be able to test this out for quite a while, as I've still not quite got enough money to buy the system, but thought there'd be no harm in aksing a few questions.

    Being in the PAL europe territory, we get an option on a lot of our games for 50 or 60hz TVs, with 60hz being the equivalent of a US tv, and 50hz being somewhat slower and less clear, the hybrid eyetv says it does not support 60Hz pal. Any idea what the implications for this would be? Any workarounds? Also i've never used S-video once, whats the picture quality like?
     
  9. Mac Rules macrumors 6502

    Mac Rules

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2006
    Location:
    Switzerland
    #9
    If it doesn't support it, then its unlikely you'll find a way around that.

    About PAL and NTSC, the only difference is that PAL runs at 50Hz compared to 60Hz, but also has more pixels on screen, so essentially theres more of an image, but NTSC runs smoother, producing a better picture...

    S-video is basically one of the best analogue signals you can use, as it splits the audio signal from the video so that theres no distortion in either. Other than that, you need to start looking at digital sources, HDMI for exmaple.

    Cheers
     
  10. TBi macrumors 68030

    TBi

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2005
    Location:
    Ireland
    #10
    You'd be better off with a Mac Mini and a 24" dell if you want to use it as a TV. The dell has all the necessary inputs to use it as a tv, S-Video, composite and RGB component. Plus you can do picture in picture and watch tv while you are using the mac. It's one of the reasons i won't buy the 24" iMac. Would have been nice if apple had included a (proprietary if needed) video in connection which would run out into a break out box that you could plug in all those.
     
  11. 7084 thread starter macrumors member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2006
    #11
    The mac mini and LCD tv was an option I did consider, but there are reasons I crossed that solution off my list, namely that a mac mini is not quite powerful enough for my needs.

    Wanting to dual boot windows and play PC games that i've missed out on for years, the intergrated graphics chip in the mini will probably not quite cut it. And as for watching HD content online etc, part of me wants the iMac as it can easily run 1080i movies.

    Hmmm, if apple released a similarly powered iMac without the screen, then hooking it up to an LCD tv would be the obvious choice, but I don't really see this happening, and getting a Pro would not only be out of my price range, but a bit over the top...

    Hmmm, its defiantely a difficult situation...
     
  12. TBi macrumors 68030

    TBi

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2005
    Location:
    Ireland
    #12
    It's a right pain in the <insert colourful words here>. That's exactly what i want, a headless iMac so i can get a better screen with more inputs. I was going to get a 17" iMac and run it with my 20" dell but i found that when you up the spec of the 17" the 20" is only 100 euro more and you get 256MB graphics memory. The 500 you save on getting the 24" could go towards that lovely 24" dell :D. Otherwise you'll be keeping your little monitor.
     
  13. Woody56292 macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2006
    #13
    wait doesn't 24" imac come with dvi connector? just go buy a pc monitor cables.
    I have some for my 360 and they work great. ( HD quality )
     
  14. 7084 thread starter macrumors member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2006
    #14
    Unfortunately, the iMac only has a DVI-out line, and no socket for a DVI-input, if it did, then this would be an easy problem to solve... well for the next gen consoles at least, what with HD being on the rise...
     

Share This Page