Does a nursing baby offend you?

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by Koodauw, Aug 4, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. macrumors 68040

    Koodauw

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2003
    Messages:
    3,758
    Location:
    Madison
    #1
    I don't see the big deal with this being on the cover of a magazine, its not graphic in any sort of way, just natural occurrence. However, I don't like it when people do this in public, something like the rest room, or some more private area is a more appropriate place.
     

    Attached Files:

  2. macrumors 68000

    Leareth

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2004
    Messages:
    1,569
    Location:
    Vancouver
    #2
    Oversensitive types overreacting.

    Nothing wrong with it , perfectly normal nice image, there are always those who blow it out of proportion...

    I have no problems with a woman breastfeeding in public either, most of the time you can't even tell.
     
  3. Lau
    Guest

    #3
    That's really sad. There's absolutely no need to be offended by that in any way, especially when there's not even a nipple visible!

    I personally don't have a problem with people breastfeeding in public. I don't even think it should be done in a restroom (that's a toilet/bathroom, yes?). Why should a baby have to feed in a bathroom? I think it's maybe nicer for a mum and her baby to go somewhere a bit quieter than in the middle of a noisy street or whatever, just so it's a bit more private and quieter for their sake, but I certainly don't think they should have to. People who are offended by this need to get over themselves.

    However, I am slightly amused by "it made my husband very uncomfortable when I left the magazine on the coffee table". Why? Did he have to adjust his trousers? :p
     
  4. macrumors G4

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2006
    Messages:
    11,832
    #4
    Being a European an image like that isn't even out of place, let alone shocking. What is it with you Americans and breasts? A baby has to eat.

    In addition, it's actually a really cute photo.
     
  5. emw
    macrumors G4

    emw

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2004
    Messages:
    11,182
    #5
    The problem isn't that it was a picture of a baby breast-feeding, it's that it wasn't Angelina Jolie doing it. :rolleyes:

    Ha! The funny thing is, there's nothing sexual at all about that picture.

    This is a perfectly natural act, and one that I find no issue with if women choose to breast-feed publicly. My wife has breast fed our children, and will do so with the third. Women in general are very discreet about this - they no more want to "expose themselves" than most people want to see it (or will admit to wanting to see it).
     
  6. macrumors 68000

    njmac

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2004
    Messages:
    1,759
    #6
    Usually women who nurse are pretty discreet about it because they don't want people looking at them either.

    I think the people in the article are overreacting in a big way. Rip the cover off so your husband doesn't see it? Yeah, that marriage is stable :rolleyes:
     
  7. jsw
    Moderator emeritus

    jsw

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2004
    Messages:
    22,803
    Location:
    Andover, MA
    #7
    I just don't understand you Europeans and your views on these sorts of things.

    That cover is pornography, plain and simple.

    If it were a picture of a dead or injured child in a war-torn area with a nice tank in the background, that'd be fine.

    If it were a side view of Britney Spears' breast with no baby, also fine.

    But a nursing infant? Please. That's akin to showing someone in the act of defecating.

    And as far as doing it in public is concerned: people should limit themselves to doing normal, natural things, like smoking, shopping, and eating. Something perverse like breast-feeding should be hidden in shame.
     
  8. macrumors 68040

    MrSmith

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2003
    Messages:
    3,022
    #8
    This is from the nation that finds the word 'toilet' disgusting and has to ask for the 'bathroom' in a restaurant :rolleyes:

    And it seems to be the women that find it offensive. Having to hide it in case her husband sees it?! Why? Is he going to vomit...or be unable to control his pants? My mother's answer to this kind of thing is a stock, "Well, people go to the toilet everyday but you don't see pictures of that everywhere". That's a completely different thing, i.e. dirty waste products. Breastfeeding is a clean, natural procedure and - most importantly - this is on the cover of a magazine concerned with caring for babies! Any grown man who feels uncomfortable when he sees a picture of a breast (sans nipple, to boot) must have a lot of issues brewing away in his psyche.

    As for breastfeeding in public, it's OK by me, as long as I don't have to see babies bring milk up. I've had three of my own so to me it's no big deal. Maybe other sectors of the population will have a different opinion.
     
  9. macrumors 68040

    patrick0brien

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2002
    Messages:
    3,238
    Location:
    The West Loop
    #9
    In my little world this is in a similar category as "someone donating to the toilet". We know it happens, just don't flaunt it.

    Don't we have enough to worry about?

    Edit: That's not to say I feel this disgusting. It's just no big deal, as long as people let it be no big deal.
     
  10. macrumors 68030

    nbs2

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2004
    Messages:
    2,700
    Location:
    A geographical oddity
    #10
    Just to echo the complaints of the other posts here, I would love to see how people are willing to let the sexual connotation of breasts (e.g. Brittany Spears Rolling Stone, Victoria's Secret catalog, etc) slide and get offended by this. I hope the offended people end up barren, divorced, lonely and never have contact with children.
     
  11. macrumors 68040

    MrSmith

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2003
    Messages:
    3,022
    #11
    Who will you catch...?
     
  12. emw
    macrumors G4

    emw

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2004
    Messages:
    11,182
    #12
    So breast-feeding a child is the same as taking a ****? Interesting viewpoint, I suppose.

    Edit: After reading your edit, I think I understand your point more clearly: "Don't announce to the world you're about to breast-feed and make a production of it, just do it." I can agree with that.
     
  13. macrumors 68000

    Danksi

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2005
    Messages:
    1,554
    Location:
    Nelson, BC. Canada
    #13
    I'd find a picture of a baby drinking from a bottle of formula much much much more disturbing than that.
     
  14. macrumors 603

    quagmire

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2004
    Messages:
    5,429
    #14
    Why is Breast feeding shameful? Breasts are part of the womens body for a reason and sorry it isn't for intercourse. The main reason for breasts is so the mother can feed her kids. Breast feeding is normal and natural. And you are a hypocrite. Eating is natural, but not breast feeding? The baby is eating the milk from the breast as a part of the babies diet. Smoking isn't natural. Smoking while accepted in society, kills you and humans aren't supposed to do it. What is next? Crystal Meth being normal and Natural when it is being compared to Breast feeding? :rolleyes:
     
  15. macrumors 6502a

    CANEHDN

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2005
    Messages:
    855
    Location:
    Eagle Mountain, UT
    #15
    Much agreed. If people think a mother should feed their baby in the washroom then they should have to eat their McDonalds in the washroom. If people don't like it or feel offended by it, then don't look. And if women are saying their husbands are offended, that's just their way of saying that that woman who was breastfeeding had better looking boobs than her and is jealous that their husbands might have seen it.


    You don't have to worry about it. It's none of your business. That's one problem I've seen with people. They think everything that's going on around them is their business.
     
  16. Moderator

    dejo

    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2004
    Messages:
    15,045
    Location:
    The Centennial State
    #16
    How do we know that's not an ass-kissing baby? ;)
     
  17. macrumors 604

    kretzy

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2004
    Messages:
    7,924
    Location:
    Canberra, Australia
    #17
    Someone's sarcasm detector is offline.
     
  18. Lau
    Guest

    #18
    Sorry, yeah, it was just the impression I got from the article. :p

    What were these women so concerned about? That their husbands would start furiously tugging away over the picture?(sorry!)That they would be unable to control themselves if they ever saw a woman breastfeeding in public? That they would suddenly want to be breastfed?! I'm not being flippant (much!) but I really don't understand what reaction the women were expecting their husbands to have.

    I can kind of understand people not liking seeing breastfeeding in public if they've been brought up to believe that breasts are 'dirty' or that it's somehow shameful (although I think they're totally wrong), but I'm genuinely racking my brains here over what the women think their husbands are going to do.
     
  19. macrumors 68000

    Shaun.P

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2003
    Messages:
    1,568
    Location:
    Omicron Persei 8
    #19
    Are you kidding?
     
  20. macrumors 6502a

    Tanglewood

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2006
    Messages:
    941
    Location:
    San Diego, CA
    #20
    When I read this part I was thinking about Robin Williams 2002 Live on Broadway Standup.

    Seriously the over-reaction of these people, "Another reader said she was "horrified" when she received the magazine and hoped that her husband hadn't laid eyes on it." Is insane.
     
  21. Lau
    Guest

    #21
    quagmire, mainly. ;)
     
  22. Guest

    iGary

    Joined:
    May 26, 2004
    Messages:
    19,583
    Location:
    Randy's House
    #22
    I don't personally mind the image, and yes, I do think Americans could be a little less sensitive in areas like this (I mean what is the worst question your kids could ask you about said image), but I think breast feeding should be as discreet as the person can make it for others. Just my personal feeling.
     
  23. macrumors 68000

    njmac

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2004
    Messages:
    1,759
    #23
    What's really disturbing is that people are taking you seriously. :confused: :rolleyes: Sarcasm is a dying art.

    But don't jump to conclusions... the baby could be adopted or the mother is unable to nurse. People are always so judgemental about mothers.
     
  24. macrumors 68030

    nbs2

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2004
    Messages:
    2,700
    Location:
    A geographical oddity
    #24
    I can see your point there. Discretion is proper - I don't want to see that Kansas cow ever chew with her mouth open or talk with her mouth full either.
     
  25. Lau
    Guest

    #25
    I can see the case for discretion, but I think most women want to be fairly discreet themselves.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page