Dual Core or Dual Processor

Discussion in 'Buying Tips and Advice' started by dwd3885, Dec 2, 2005.

  1. dwd3885 macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2004
    #1
    So I'm in the market for a Power Mac Dual G5, either the new ones that came out or the Revision B ones with 8GB max RAM (The good revision). I was wondering if I should get the new Dual Core 2ghz with educational discount for 1799 or should I get a refurbed Dual CPU 2ghz at the Apple Store for 1499. I know the differences between the two, PCI express, 16gb max RAM, etc. But what would be the better deal? 1500 is kind of my budget, but if I can get a lot better computer for a few hundred more, I might just be able to swing it for Christmas. I don't really want to wait for MWSF so please don't say to wait until then. I do a lot of audio work, web design, photo and video editing, etc. But from what I've read, the performance difference isn't all that different between the two computers. Thanks for the help.
     
  2. aesth3tic macrumors member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2005
    Location:
    University of Washington
    #2
    i don't know where you read that the performance difference wasn't that different, but you are wrong. the difference between dual core and dual processor is so great that owning a dual core is the way to go. are you doing professional work or are you a hobby user? if you are a hobby user go with the dual processor, if you are a pro use the dual core. the dual core reduces the communication time between the two processors and thus there is better speed yields. the ddr2 ram is a whole lot faster and the 1mb cache is like twice what the dual processors are. i would go with the dual core if you can afford it
     
  3. mad jew Moderator emeritus

    mad jew

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2004
    Location:
    Adelaide, Australia
    #3

    Yeah, it's certainly not worth $300 assuming the other specs (RAM, hard drive and so on) are the same. :)
     
  4. Lacero macrumors 604

    Lacero

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2005
    #4
    I'd go with the dual processor machine. You can use the extra few hundred dollars to put into a nicer display or more RAM.
     
  5. djkny macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2003
    #5

    Are you looking at the Apple Refurbs site? The Rev B Dualie, I've seen, for $1449 actually, and disappears as quickly as it appears. The better deal is the Dualie 1.8GHZ for $1299 which also gets sold out quickly! I'm hunting for these at 5AM EST and see them flash on and off. It's a race to the finish.
     
  6. Bear macrumors G3

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2002
    Location:
    Sol III - Terra
    #6
    At the same processor speed, a Dual Core system will be faster than a dual processor system. Enough faster to be worth the price difference? That is up to you.

    On the dual core systems, the memory bus is faster and each core has twice as much cache as the single core processors. Also, the two cores in on processor can snoop in each others cache which improves speed as well.

    ANother major difference is that with the dual core systems, you can do a CTO system. And one upgrade you should do in that case is upgrade the nVidia 6600LE to at least the 6600.
     
  7. dwd3885 thread starter macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2004
    #7
    i probably won't have enough money to CTO the 6600LE, the good thing about getting the new one would be that I can sell the Mighty Mouse!
     
  8. brendel95 macrumors regular

    Joined:
    May 23, 2005
    #8
    For most of the work you throw, the speed difference would be less than a minute. But if you are doing like more than couple of days required job (100% cpu time all the way) like scientific computation, that one minitue goes to a day or more.

    So if you don't plan to do a big job, go for the rev B machine and save money for more ram or display.

    Good luck
     
  9. Bear macrumors G3

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2002
    Location:
    Sol III - Terra
    #9
    It's a $50 difference to CTO upgrade from the 6600LE to the 6600.
     
  10. wiseguy27 macrumors 6502

    wiseguy27

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2005
    Location:
    USA
    #10
    dual core!!!

    I'd strongly recommend the latest dual core machines! Look at it from the point of upgrading in the future - the dual cores provide a lot better "future" in terms of hardware upgrades than the previous dual processorr machines.

    Just some big differences:
    * DDR2 RAM vs. DDR RAM (which is slowly on its way out)
    * PCI Express vs. PCIx
    * 16GB max. RAM vs. 8GB max. RAM

    The dual core will be expandable for a much longer time than the previous dual processor machines. :cool:

    If you like being future proof, at this point in time only the dual cores make sense! :)
     
  11. FireArse macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2004
    #11
    arsey

    I cannot agree more. Note that chip manufacturers AND computer suppliers want to go dual core on single die to cut costs. If I were you, AND the need for 16GB of ram and PCI-Express isn't there, Id go with the rev B cos it'll have cost Apple and IBM to actually make to seperate G5 chips. You get better value for money! weird way of seeing things i know, but ib my head it makes sense.

    Must admit, the wireless antannae and the dual Gb ethernet are nice on the newer chassis though! :)
     
  12. kwajo.com macrumors 6502a

    kwajo.com

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2002
    Location:
    Bay of Fundy
    #12
    while I agree about the future proofing concept, I must point out that you can put 16GB or more in any G5, just so long as you can get the RAM chips for that much memory. it's sort of like how Apple used to say the Alubooks have a max of 1GB memory and then at a revision they said the max was now 2GB, and it had nothing to do with any real changes they made, just that 1GB chips were now entering the mainstream market and they officially were supporting their use now
     
  13. zap2 macrumors 604

    zap2

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2005
    Location:
    Washington D.C
    #13
    Both get Dual Core Dual Processors(the Quad PowerMac)

    :D
     
  14. dwd3885 thread starter macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2004
    #14
    got an offer for a Rev C PM. It's 2ghz but only 1300. I was thinking, 4gb of RAM could hold me over for a few years, and then when the Intel Macs are stable, I can jump on one of those. Thoughts?
     
  15. Koodauw macrumors 68040

    Koodauw

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2003
    Location:
    Madison
    #15
    That sounds like a good deal to me. I'd Jump on it.
     
  16. Sun Baked macrumors G5

    Sun Baked

    Joined:
    May 19, 2002
    #16
    Actually you neglected another huge difference, twice the L2 cache per core on the dual core machine.

    This alone is an important features, even though they are shifting to a shared FSB -- the bigger cache still increases performance. Of course there is also improved sideband cache snooping for the dual core, via a more direct connection between the two cores.
     
  17. kwajo.com macrumors 6502a

    kwajo.com

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2002
    Location:
    Bay of Fundy
    #17
    in defense of the dual processor machines, they do have dedicated buses to each processor instead of each core sharing a single bus, but I know that doesn't make up for the other advantages the dual-core models have, I'm just throwing more info into the discussion
     
  18. Bear macrumors G3

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2002
    Location:
    Sol III - Terra
    #18
    Actually if you look at the speed of memory versus the speed of the FSB, even two cores sharing one FSB will probably not max out the FSB on the dual core 2.0GHz. This is even more true on the dual core 2.3 and the Quad 2.5.
     
  19. generik macrumors 601

    generik

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2005
    Location:
    Minitrue
    #19
    Why would it be even more true?? :confused:

    As the processor speed increases doesn't it follow that it needs a bigger bandwidth to keep its cache fueled?
     
  20. Bear macrumors G3

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2002
    Location:
    Sol III - Terra
    #20
    The memory speed doesn't change. The FSB speed does increase when the processor speed increases. Therefore, the memory bus becomes even more of a limiting factor.
     
  21. generik macrumors 601

    generik

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2005
    Location:
    Minitrue
    #21
    Hmm..

    However one downside of the new dual core PMs is it doesn't seem to have any legacy PCI slots, which means if you depend on one of those you are really stuffed.
     
  22. dwd3885 thread starter macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2004
    #22
    Now along these lines, what would be the better purchase for longevity? I know the intel macs will be coming out soon, so that might mean the dual core macs aren't as great of a deal? Or I imagine the DDR2 staying and PCI-Express staying in the Intel Macs, so I can just transfer all that RAM if I got an Intel Mac later. I guess I'm saying that buying a dual core pm because it might last longer than the dual proc is a moot point, since everything is switching over anyway. Am I right? What are your thoughts?
     
  23. bodeh6 macrumors 6502a

    bodeh6

    Joined:
    May 18, 2005
    #23
    You also have to remember that they really don't make any more AGP video cards. All the good ones only come out in PCIe versions. This is a big deal for future expandibility. I would get the latest dual core 2GHz with 2.5GB (512 Apple + 2GB Crucial) with 7800 GT and a Dell 2405FWP if I were to buy a setup now.
     
  24. dwd3885 thread starter macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2004
    #24
    i do liike that fact. you're right. i probably would us it for a long long time to come really. probably like 5 years IMO. But I know I would end up selling it and getting the Intel Mac when it first comes out, lol. I do love the 16gb RAM max, even though I just need 1gb for now, maybe 2. It's interesting to say the least. And you can split payment between cards at Apple? I didn't know that, but hey, I just might bite on the $1799 w/edu discount. Debt is a wonderful thing!
     
  25. generik macrumors 601

    generik

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2005
    Location:
    Minitrue
    #25
    Personally I find it a bad deal right now, but if they cut just $300 off the price suddenly it willl be so much more attractive.

    I'll wait, my guess is that it will happen in March as a sort of "Powermac clearance sale" :)
     

Share This Page