Every mainstream consumer doing typical tasks should conside...

Discussion in 'MacBytes.com News Discussion' started by MacBytes, Oct 13, 2005.

  1. macrumors bot

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2003
  2. macrumors 6502a

    mac 2005

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2005
    Location:
    Chicago
    #2
    The headline doesn't reflect the essence of the article. While the columnist makes that statement, he doesn't substantiate it.

    I'd read the article -- hoping to send it along to some Mac-resistant people I know. How could they resist an objective source such as the Wall Street Journal.

    All-too-easily in this case. The article focuses not on the virtues of the Mac vs. a Windows PC but on what hardware will likely be required to run Vista.
     
  3. macrumors 6502a

    csubear

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2003
    #3
    Slam! In other words buy a mac :)
     
  4. macrumors 603

    Stella

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2003
    Location:
    Canada
    #4
    The revamped iMacs are an excellent buy - very fast, good display, excellent quality web cam, and a good software bundle.

    For day to day tasks, email, internet etc, word processing, a PC + Windows would be hard pressed to surpass the iMac. ( Apart from people who want a "$400" PC, i.e., where price is crucial. ).
     
  5. macrumors 6502a

    MacFan782040

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2003
    Location:
    Scranton, PA
    #5
    90% of that article was about Vista. It was like here's stuff about vista, oh btw, and if you don't want crap, consider a mac. Vista's new features are....
     
  6. macrumors 68020

    mainstreetmark

    Joined:
    May 7, 2003
    Location:
    Saint Augustine, FL
    #6
    To be perfectly clear, the title of the article is "What PC to Buy If You Are Planning On a Vista Upgrade", not "Every mainstream consumer doing typical tasks should consider Apple Mac", which made it as the macbytes headline.

    This article is clearly targeted to PC users wishing to purchase another PC.
     
  7. macrumors 68020

    winmacguy

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2003
    Location:
    New Zealand
    #7
    The headline was to grab everybodies attention which is why I used it. I was impressed to see that even WSJ is pointing PC customers to the better option of a Mac when they are looking at purchasing Vista.
     
  8. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2003
    Location:
    Boston
    #8
    It's written by Mossberg. Search around for his other articles in the WSJ and I'm sure you'll see plenty of long diatribes about why the Mac is better. He's a very trusted source and tends to come down on the Mac side.

    I feel like the fact that every "What PC to Buy?" article these days mentions a Mac as a good option is a great sign.
     
  9. macrumors G5

    nagromme

    Joined:
    May 2, 2002
    #9
    In a way it's even BETTER for Mac to get this kind of mention than to get a Mac-focussed article.

    A Windows-focussed article, all about Windows and how Windows users can best keep on using Windows for years to come. But Apple gets mentioned, in no uncertain terms, as a likely better option! A message that is slowly going to trickle through to some people fed up with Windows.

    That kind of aside is gold. Imagine if an article a year before Tiger's release had a note saying, "but Windows Vista is already out and much better anyway." Ouch!
     
  10. macrumors G3

    iMeowbot

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2003
    #10
    Yep, and it's not the real headline either. Some clown keeps submitting articles to Macbytes with the titles doctored to include outrageous spin and/or flamebait.
     
  11. macrumors 68020

    winmacguy

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2003
    Location:
    New Zealand
    #11
    Flamebait headings aside it is still good to see Apple getting reputable mention in an article talking about the up and coming features of Vista. :)

    Edit: I have to say after taking a second look at the heading and talking to lots of people in different stores that I agree with it. The fact that our lives not only revolve around spreadsheets and word documents (95% population) but also ripping CD tracks, viewing photos/movies etc. All of which the Mac is ideally suited. It is only people's perception and familiarity that slows them from making a Mac purchase over a PC purchase in the store.
     
  12. macrumors 6502a

    SummerBreeze

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2005
    Location:
    Chicago, IL
    #12
    I liked the article. They never had to mention the Mac, since the article was about the PC. The fact that they did shows how far Apple has come lately.
     
  13. macrumors G5

    nagromme

    Joined:
    May 2, 2002
    #13
    To defend the submitter (NOT me, for the record :) ), when you submit an article at MacBytes, it doesn't ask for "the headline" it asks for a description (and in fact has a pretty large box to create one in).

    So using the description to highlight what's interesting to people here makes good sense, instead of just repeating the headline. (The original headline might often give no hint of what makes the article of interest.)

    I don't see this headline as flamebait, just as calling out what makes the link worth submitting.
     
  14. macrumors G3

    iMeowbot

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2003
    #14
    This example was all spin, although other recent submissions have been outright flamebait. I've no problem with a headline that is changed for clarity or to point out relevancy, but that is not what is being done here. It's destroying context to change the author's intent.
     
  15. macrumors G5

    nagromme

    Joined:
    May 2, 2002
    #15
    I agree--I just think it's not clear when you submit an article that the description SHOULD follow the author's intent. Following what makes it interesting to Mac users instead has a certain logic, since you also get the author's headline anyway.

    (This posting, for instance, WAS of interest to me, and I'd never have clicked it without knowing in advance why it was posted. And since I DID appreciate the link, I felt it would be nice to defend the poster who was being called names. Possibly for something they didn't intend to cause offense with.)
     
  16. macrumors 68020

    mainstreetmark

    Joined:
    May 7, 2003
    Location:
    Saint Augustine, FL
    #16
    I think the macbyte reader should take more care to remember that the links on macbytes are not the article headlines. They're statements. The submitter did perfectly fine - pointing out that there's some mac stuff in there. It's the readers who decided that the article didn't have enough to do with Macs (since, it turned out, it was a PC article)
     

Share This Page