excess thread

Discussion in 'Community' started by funkywhat2, Apr 22, 2003.

  1. funkywhat2 macrumors 6502a

    funkywhat2

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2002
    #1
  2. jelloshotsrule macrumors G3

    jelloshotsrule

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2002
    Location:
    serendipity
    #2
    Re: excess thread

    that's like saying....

    tell us all your favorite dessert.... but no ice cream or cookies please!


    no sense makey.
     
  3. guitargeek macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2003
    #3
    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    An old caddy and a 10 liter 8 cylinder beast are about the most excessive things I can think of. That and the Grip Master my mother just bought me, but that's more lazy than anything else.

    :D
     
  4. G4scott macrumors 68020

    G4scott

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2002
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    #4
  5. funkywhat2 thread starter macrumors 6502a

    funkywhat2

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2002
    #6
    Re: Re: excess thread

    I don't like flame wars, and thats what those talks always turn into. If you desire to rant, I'd be glad to change it and argue with you.
     
  6. scem0 macrumors 604

    scem0

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2002
    Location:
    back in NYC!
    #7
    howabout:
     

    Attached Files:

  7. Dignan macrumors 6502a

    Dignan

    Joined:
    May 28, 2002
    #8
    Either a new Bugatti Veron with V16, 1001 hp, a million bucks, top speed of 250mph, and a diamond in the speedo...or

    one of those million dollar watches, minute repeater/perpetual calender/etc. in gold with diamonds and such.

    or....

    Ben and Jerry's Half baked......

    Better yet, what if you filmed all your home videos on a 3D imax camera?
     
  8. herr_neumann macrumors 6502

    herr_neumann

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2003
    Location:
    Roseville, Ca
    #10
    Re: no SUVs eh?

    Too bad that plane doesnt actually hold that many bombs. If it did we would only need like four. It would save tons of money that we could spend elsewhere......;)
     
  9. zimv20 macrumors 601

    zimv20

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2002
    Location:
    toronto
    #11
    Re: Re: no SUVs eh?

    it holds quite a bit. its conventional ordinance:
    80 MK82, 16 MK84, 34-36 CBU87, 34-36 CBU89, 34-36 CBU97

    those could be mk82s in that photo; they're about the right size/shape. and it holds 80 of 'em. in fact, you might even say it's excessive. :)

    source

    mk82 photos
     
  10. MacBandit macrumors 604

    MacBandit

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2002
    Location:
    Springfield, OR (Home of the Simpsons)
    #12
    This ought to be about right. My tar will work too though.
     

    Attached Files:

  11. herr_neumann macrumors 6502

    herr_neumann

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2003
    Location:
    Roseville, Ca
    #13
    Re: Re: Re: no SUVs eh?

    well, from the pic it looks like those bombs are ~1.79m long and the mk82 is 2.21m long and the mk81 isnt not listed on the list of availble bomb, but it is 1.88m long so that would be close. but these calculations are based on the bombs length in reference to the bombers length (20.9m). But, I could be wrong since the pic is not the greatest.
     
  12. zimv20 macrumors 601

    zimv20

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2002
    Location:
    toronto
    #14
    Re: Re: Re: Re: no SUVs eh?

    wow, awesome work! lol

    okay, looking at the pic in question, i think it's a composite. even if it did drop bombs that quickly, they wouldn't come straight down.

    have a look at the link from my post; in there is a video of the b2 "in action." there's a shot in the video that's a lot like the photo, except the bombs are farther between and behind the aircraft, as we'd expect.

    i think the amount of analysis we've done on this tangent is excessive :)
     
  13. GeneR macrumors 6502a

    GeneR

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2003
    Location:
    The land of delusions, CA.
    #15
    Yeeeep.

    Yep. That's a wee bit excessive. :D
     
  14. ibookin' macrumors 65816

    ibookin'

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2002
    Location:
    Los Angeles, CA
    #16
    Re: Yeeeep.

    Excessive would be with the SCSI drives.
     
  15. MacFan25 macrumors 68000

    MacFan25

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2003
    Location:
    USA
    #17
    Are you saying that buying too many macs is excessive?!? :eek: ;) :D
     
  16. janey macrumors 603

    janey

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2002
    Location:
    sunny los angeles
    #19
    this is what an ordinary pc weenie would call an excessive purchase from the apple store
     

    Attached Files:

  17. scem0 macrumors 604

    scem0

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2002
    Location:
    back in NYC!
    #20
    uber beat me :(.

    I'll get you back.... after I eat. :D

    okay done eating....

    [​IMG]

    +
     
  18. scem0 macrumors 604

    scem0

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2002
    Location:
    back in NYC!
    #21
    this(999):

    = more than you :D
     

    Attached Files:

  19. G4scott macrumors 68020

    G4scott

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2002
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    #22
    I believe this is excessive (BS, that is):


    Why don't they start advocating the amount of people who die because of alcohol related car accidents each year? Oh wait, because that doesn't convey a political message like civilians killed in war... War is bad, and people die, but far less people will die because of this war than if saddam was in power.

    From MADD (this is truly excess):

    If you really want to save lives, don't drink and drive. Enough about death...

    What's really excess: A 32k song limit in iTunes...
     

Share This Page