F1 to consider wage and age limit

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by iGav, Jan 26, 2005.

  1. iGav macrumors G3

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2002
    #1
    Wage limit I could go with... but an age limit! :eek: :eek: :rolleyes:

    Unbelievable...

    I still can't believe they haven't figured out what is wrong with F1... :rolleyes:
     
  2. Lord Blackadder macrumors G5

    Lord Blackadder

    Joined:
    May 7, 2004
    Location:
    Sod off
    #2
    Sounds like they're really grasping at straws...if this year turns out to be competitive they'll probably drop this.
     
  3. brap macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    May 10, 2004
    Location:
    Nottingham
    #3
    That's so not the point.

    This is just a poorly disguised attempt to oust Schumi for being too damn good. I don't like the guy's attitude, but he's without a doubt one of the greatest, if not the greatest. What a shambles.
     
  4. Lord Blackadder macrumors G5

    Lord Blackadder

    Joined:
    May 7, 2004
    Location:
    Sod off
    #4
    Sure this is aimed at getting rid of Schuey's dominance, but if somebody else wins the title this year, do you honestly think they'll continue trying to indermine him to the extent that they are now? Right now, as I said, other teams are willing to back any rule or regulation that might hurt Ferrari, almost without exception.

    Where do you think it ends, then? When Schuey is gone, or no longer dominant? You may be right, but if they keep this up they will turn F1 into a laughingstock. Next thing you know they'll be giving Schuey a 15-second handicap.
     
  5. brap macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    May 10, 2004
    Location:
    Nottingham
    #5
    Nothing comes as a surprise, looking at the mickey mouse regs they are looking at (and those which have passed).
    I've a feeling it will end once the other teams catch up - not that it's right, in any way, but it does seem like this is their intent. Personally, I think Ferrari have done a damn fine job, and ought not to be penalised for it.
     
  6. Lord Blackadder macrumors G5

    Lord Blackadder

    Joined:
    May 7, 2004
    Location:
    Sod off
    #6
    I don't know, when you look at the state of F! right now, I feel that Ferrari's dominance has a negative effect on the sport, because lets face it - the results are pretty predictable.

    With that said, you are totally correct that it is NOT Ferrari's fault and they should not be penalized. However, it seems inevitable that other teams will try to erode Ferrari's ability to win off the track if they can't beat them in the races. Other teams need to start winning races, that's all there is to it. If this season sees McLaren or BAR or somebody stepping up and winning races and making the championship really close, I think that some of this rules nonsense will cease to be as big of an issue.

    With ONE caveat: the article mentioned that several teams are operating with an unsustainably large budget in order to keep up with Ferrari. Even if the series gets truly competitive again, some teams may be spent out financially. I don't know the numbers on that, however.
     
  7. virividox macrumors 601

    virividox

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2003
    Location:
    Manila - Nottingham - Philadelphia - Santa Barbar
    #7
    a wage limit i can live with, i mean many sports have capped salaries, so it makes sense, but an age limit, if a guy is old but still pushes the limit and leads the field he shouldnt be excluded thats just stupid
     
  8. Lord Blackadder macrumors G5

    Lord Blackadder

    Joined:
    May 7, 2004
    Location:
    Sod off
    #8
    The age limit IS dumb; If Schuey is still kicking A** in his 40's there's absolutely no reason to boot him out. (Although the thought of that probably keeps other teams awake nights.) :p
     
  9. johnnowak macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2003
    Location:
    New York, New York
  10. iGav thread starter macrumors G3

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2002
    #10
    I don't think it's aimed at Schumacher myself, he'd have retired before this rule was passed.

    But I do think it's possibly aimed at stopping another period of dominance like what we are seeing now, which if you take Kimi for example is a real possibility in the future, he's very young and very good.

    I wonder what the age would be??? 33, 36, 39?? it's insane... age has nothing to do with it, look at Prost, Mansell, D Hill, Fangio... okay there was Patrese but I'm sure you get my drift. ;)

    Now a wage cap would be a good start, or maybe pay-per-point?
     
  11. mpw Guest

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2004
    #11
    IMO

    Wage limit: Never going to happen. Maybe a limit on a teams budget but I can't see that even being workable.

    Age limit: Even less likely to happen. It'd almost certainly be illegal in Europe and America.

    Technical limits are the only measure they'll be able to take to save F1.

    I say have a fuel limit that forces the teams to achieve an arbitary consumption figure of say 30mpg of regular road pump fuel and put them on any brand of tire as long as they're available original equipment on a production car selling for less than $100,000 and not in limited production.
     
  12. edesignuk Moderator emeritus

    edesignuk

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2002
    Location:
    London, England
    #12
    That's what I wish they'd do with footballers ;)
     
  13. iGav thread starter macrumors G3

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2002
    #13

    The thing with that though is that you'd need to apply those rules to all the lower formula, otherwise F1 wouldn't be the fastest anymore, and then it's not really F1. ;)


    that's exactly what I was thinking as I was typing it... heheheh
     
  14. Counterfit macrumors G3

    Counterfit

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2003
    Location:
    sitting on your shoulder
    #14
    They tried that before though. Made it tricky for the drivers, and I doubt it cut costs at all. I do recall hearing that Prost was excellent at managing the fuel consumption too... ;)
     
  15. mpw Guest

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2004
    #15
    The point is F1 isn't working as it is, so why not make the changes to the lower formulas?

    I don't watch F1 (when I bother at all) for the outright speed I watch for the skill and excitement.

    I'll bet that each team would find ways to get their fuel consumptions down and still give us a more exciting race than at present if on skinny tires.
     
  16. mpw Guest

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2004
    #16
    I've got it!

    To bring back the excitement they should bring an element of that school yard favourite....Tag!

    One driver starts with a 30 sec. penalty and can pass that penalty to any other driver by taggin him! Maybe 45sec. for a really big shunt!

    Now we're gonna see some action.
     
  17. wdlove macrumors P6

    wdlove

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2002
    #17
    Instead of an age limit there should be a mandatory physical to determine fitness to race. If all sides agree then there will probably be a salary cap.
     
  18. MOFS macrumors 65816

    MOFS

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2003
    Location:
    Durham, UK
    #18
    I think the age limit is for the second driver. So while Michael Schumacher would never be affected, Barichello might. I think this makes sense, since duffers who hang around doing nothing but complain (cough Coulthard!)
    would have to work consistently hard to get to be first driver, while there would be more younger drivers at teams.
     
  19. iGav thread starter macrumors G3

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2002
    #19
    Yeah Prost had a very smooth and sympathetic driving and throttle style. ;)

    Have you seen the video with Senna driving an NSX at Suzuka?? They installed 3 in-car cameras to capture his feet (with his scary Wacko Jacko black leather slip ons and white socks) the speedo/tacho and interior vista.

    Senna used to do this really mental thing with his right foot on the throttle.... he used to repeatedly floor it and lift off, floor it and lift off in mid corner, such a strange technique.

    There's alot of debate about what he was trying to do, some think it was a habit from the turbo days, which he used to try and overcome the massive turbo lag of the '80's to try and keep the turbo spooled up, or that he was trying to use it as a basic form of traction control.

    Others believe that he was driving the NSX (which is naturally aspirated) to curb the understeer the NSX was famed for, whilst trying to keep the needle as close to the peak rpm range as possible and thus keep the engine on the boil, whatever he was trying to do though... it certainly wasn't good for fuel consumption. :p

    Of course the real master of car preservation was Jim Clark. :)


    Because maybe there is nothing wrong with those lower formula's and changing them may negatively affect them perhaps?


    If you're not bothered about outright speed, why not just watch F3000 or DTM?? DTM's brilliant... much better than our Touring Car series, and they've got Mika and Alesi too :)

    If F1 were to lose it's crown as the fastest single seat race series, then it has little to differentiate itself from lower formula or the emerging GP2 which as I understand will be more more powerful (atleast at the beginning) than F1 when the latter reverts to V8's next season.


    God no! 'cos then Montoya would be champ! :eek: :p :p
     
  20. MOFS macrumors 65816

    MOFS

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2003
    Location:
    Durham, UK
    #20
    But Schumacher would always finish last, because of his tendancy to crash into cars and not get noticed! :D :p
     
  21. chanoc macrumors 6502

    chanoc

    Joined:
    May 20, 2003
    Location:
    Anchorage, Alaska USA
    #21
    Is F1 like the events in the USA where rednecks go drink beer in the hot sun, and mindlessly watch cars go around in circles? :rolleyes: :D
     
  22. Lord Blackadder macrumors G5

    Lord Blackadder

    Joined:
    May 7, 2004
    Location:
    Sod off
    #22
    Yeah, except for the circles part. F1 has real corners. :p :D

    STEREOTYPICAL NASCAR FAN:

    Beer: Natural Light, Natural Ice, other cheap watery p***
    Music: Country
    Hairstyle: Mullet
    Vehicle of Choice: 3/4 ton heavy-duty Chevy/Ford/Dodge pickup with dualies and 5th wheel pulling a 40-foot RV trailer.

    So what is a stereotypical European F1 fan? I'll leave it to one of our contributers from across the pond to play along and answer that.
     
  23. DrEasy macrumors member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2004
    #23
    don't get me started on what's wrong with F1! :0

    - refuelling: they introduced it about 15 years ago thinking it made for a great show. What were they thinking? All it did was typically allow Shumi to wait for the guy in front of him to go to the pits, do a couple of quick laps before getting in as well. Think of all the overtaking manoeuvres we have been deprived because of that! Not to mention security issues, do you remember what happened to Verstappen?

    - bad economy due to the stupid concorde agreements: Bernie gets 70% of TV rights, that's unbelievable! Give him 33% (and I'm generous), and you'll see more teams entering the competition. More cars on the track means more overtaking! And get rid (at least temporarily) of that big entrance fee for new teams, we need new blood!

    - boring tracks: with all the chicanes and slow turns, how can tracks separate the men from the boys? We need more of "eau rouge" and less of hungaroring!

    - idiotic new qualifying rules: messing up with tradition will alienate the real fans, and it's not like the new rules have introduced any type of excitement.

    - ridiculously stupid new scoring system: even Zsoltgartner can score points now by just driving home his Minardi (assuming a few cars break down in front of him). How is that the pinnacle of racing? Points attributed to the top 8, knowing that we barely manage to have 18 cars on the track, hell I could score points with my Cavalier.

    - bad TV: if only the directors showed what was happening at the back of the pack from time to time, we'd be witnessing some great racing. And there would be more sponsors willing to finance the backmarkers. Pop quizz: which driver had the biggest number of successful overtaking moves last season?

    I used to be a HUGE F1 fan, but for the past couple of years I haven't bothered watching any of it, I just follow the results on the web. F1 has always been about business first, but whatever charm it had is totally gone now. We need people like Jackie Stewart or Nelson Piquet (people with credentials, character and charisma) to get involved and rescue F1.

    EDIT: answer to the pop quiz: Felipe Massa.
     
  24. chanoc macrumors 6502

    chanoc

    Joined:
    May 20, 2003
    Location:
    Anchorage, Alaska USA
    #24
    I will never forget when Tom Leykis dissed Dale Earnheart after he died. So many redneck callers were irrate and threaten to kick Tom's ass - too funny. Found the file on the P2P Gnutella network, but have since lost it.

    So what is so intellectualy appealing about watching cars go around in circles? Oh wait, common sense! :rolleyes:
     
  25. Counterfit macrumors G3

    Counterfit

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2003
    Location:
    sitting on your shoulder
    #25
    There is actually. If Dr. Sid Watkins says "You're not fit enough", well, that's it, you're not racing until he changes his mind. And Michael Schumacher is probably the fittest driver on the grid (not like there's much difference between them all now anyway :rolleyes: ) and yet he's also the oldest (thanks to Panis' retirement).

    we can't let that happen!! *ties Monty's shoes together* :D
     

Share This Page