FireWire 400 or 800?

Discussion in 'MacBook Pro' started by team 79 krunch, Jul 24, 2008.

  1. team 79 krunch
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors member

    team 79 krunch

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2008
    #1
    I am going to upgrade my 17" 2.5GHz 4GB RAM MBP's hard drive to a 500GB 5400-RPM drive. I want to use the 250GB 5400-RPM drive as an external. IS there a major difference between FireWire 400 & FireWire 800?
    My main concerns are speed and power consumption.
     
  2. bc008
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 68000

    bc008

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2007
    Location:
    Michigan
    #2
    FW800 is literally twice as fast as FW400.

    i dont know about power consumption
     
  3. bigrell486
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 6502

    bigrell486

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2006
    Location:
    Home
    #3
    800 is faster than 400 and USB 2.0.
    Power Consumption depends on the device.
     
  4. GGJstudios
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors Westmere

    GGJstudios

    Joined:
    May 16, 2008
    #4
    I use Firewire 800 for my external drive and the difference is noticeable! Screamin' fast!
     
  5. Herrow
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2008
    #5
    FW 800 is considered "pro" level for a reason...very fast, especially noticeable when moving very large files or folders.
     
  6. jjahshik32
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 603

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2006
  7. Bobioden
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 68000

    Bobioden

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2007
    Location:
    Denver
    #7
    If you are just going to be using the external as a Time Machine backup drive than it really wouldn't make a difference.
     
  8. alphaod
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors Core

    alphaod

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2008
    Location:
    San Jose (CA)
    #8
    It does if you have 300GB of backups to make! ;)

    And yes FW800 is a lot faster and the power consumption for all FW official spec devices should be the same.
     
  9. Bobioden
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 68000

    Bobioden

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2007
    Location:
    Denver
    #9
    But if it is only going to be used for a TM backup, the first time it will be slow, after that it is not going to make a difference.
     
  10. noodle654
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 68020

    noodle654

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2005
    Location:
    Never Ender
    #10
    I am about to change my external hard drive setup. I am currently using the WD Passport (USB) and that thing is slow, I hate it. I plan on getting the WD Studio Edition with the USB, eSata, and FireWire 800/400. I wish WD made a drive that has just USB and FireWire at a lower cost. I dont need eSATA at all.
     
  11. CaptainChunk
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 68020

    CaptainChunk

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2008
    Location:
    Tempe, AZ
    #11
    They do. It's called the MyBook Home Edition. It has USB 2.0 and FW400, but no FW800.
     
  12. DoFoT9
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors P6

    DoFoT9

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2007
    Location:
    Singapore
    #12
    it will most likely even be faster than USB3.0!!!!!!! :D

    that backup will only be made once, so it wont really make that much of a difference the first time (backup will only go on average about 5-10mbps).

    the first time the database has to be made, so its extremely slow.. it runs in the background as low priority anyways, so thats why its so slow.. could probably change it but meh.
     
  13. noodle654
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 68020

    noodle654

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2005
    Location:
    Never Ender
    #13
    Yeah but I am looking for the 800. Its fine though, I can get one on eBay for cheap and get the 25% off Live deal.
     

Share This Page