Firewire wanna be

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by spinner, Sep 30, 2002.

  1. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2002
    Location:
    South Dakota
    #1
    Looks like USB is trying to play catch up with Firewire again. :rolleyes:

    Click
     
  2. macrumors 68020

    sparkleytone

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2001
    Location:
    Greensboro, NC
    #2
    bah.

    they are having to modify a "standard" in order to finally get features that firewire has had all along.
     
  3. macrumors 68030

    cr2sh

    Joined:
    May 28, 2002
    Location:
    downtown
    #3
    the funniest thing about the article is this line:

    "The technology is also expected to be used in cell phones and MP3 players. "

    Uh.... No?
    Thats not technology, thats archaic nonsense.
     
  4. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    May 31, 2002
    Location:
    Tuscaloosa, Alabama
    #4
    I'm just looking forward to FireWire2. Its gonna' dust everything!
     
  5. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2001
    #5
    USB 2 is winning...

    Hate to say it, but it looks like USB 2 is becoming far more prolific than Firewire. The fact is that USB 2 is cheaper and for most users, there isn't much of a perceived performance difference.

    My predictions:

    1) Firewire will be relegated to high-end niche applications within 2 years.
    2) USB 2 will become a defacto standard in the same time frame

    Final prediction:

    Apple's clinging to FireWire will cause them to be at least a year late to the USB 2 party, leaving Apple consumers to suffer while PCs get all the good peripherals.
     
  6. macrumors 68030

    medea

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2002
    Location:
    Madison, Wi
    #6
    I disagree with Oldmac, USB2 has plenty of disadvantages so I think it would a bad move to shift to USB2. PC users might need a faster option than USB but Apple users already have it and it's much more reliable.
     
  7. macrumors 68020

    P-Worm

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2002
    Location:
    Salt Lake City, UT
    #7
    Is it true that USB 2 doesn't provide power at the same time. Because if it is that sucks. That's just another thing that makes the iPod so cool.

    P-Worm
     
  8. macrumors 68020

    G4scott

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2002
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    #8
    USB sucks. It's good for mice, keyboards, and other small bandwidth devices. USB 2 is for really fast mice and keyboards :rolleyes:

    USB is a serial bus... It may be cheaper to put into a device, but then for some devices like hard drives, you need a power supply where firewire wouldn't. Hopefully Firewire2 will mop the floors with USB2...

    Another reason why USB sucks: It's made by intel :p

    Actually, the problem that I have with USB, is that it's like hooking up a hard drive with an old serial port, where firewire most resembles scsi.
     
  9. macrumors 6502a

    funkywhat2

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2002
    #9
    isn't firewire a serial standard too? it just carries power, as well as data.
     
  10. job
    macrumors 68040

    job

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2002
    Location:
    in transit
    #10
    I though Firewire was completely new, not based off of any old legacy tech..
     
  11. macrumors 6502a

    funkywhat2

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2002
  12. macrumors 68000

    dongmin

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2002
    #12
    Firewire is amazing; it's one of the best technologies to come out of Apple (much better than SCSI). But it's suffering the same fate as many Apple technologies: the lack of marketing and slowness of adoption.

    I'm starting to lose confidence in the future of firewire. Firewire hasn't made anywhere near the kinds of market strides I expected and hoped it would.
     
  13. job
    macrumors 68040

    job

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2002
    Location:
    in transit
    #13
    I dunno about that. I've seen countless peripherials (Creative) and desktop and laptop PCs with Firewire ports. They call it by the industry name IEEE 1394, but it's still Firewire. :p
     
  14. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2002
    #14
    my old g4 was hit by lightning the other week. everything but my usb hub and my firewire cd burner was hooked into a surge protector.The lightning took out my usb scanner ,printer, and the usb port in my computer itself. bothe the usb hub hub and my cd burner had ground plugs and hooked to the same outlet yet my firewire drive came out unscathed. that is why i love firewire either that or i hate usb for being such a good cinductor.
     
  15. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2002
    Location:
    Eindhoven
    #15
    From the developer point of view is USB2 far better supported than FireWire. It's almost impossible to get simple and easy support for developing FireWire peripherals. The low level is good documented, but the high level and application layer software is difficult to master.

    FireWire is only suitable for developers with high volume and enough money. Chipsets for FireWire are twice the price of the USB chipsets and twice the board area as well. And the fee for a vendor identifier is four times more expensive...

    I bet that USB2 will find a broader acceptance very soon. Well, at least I like it!
     
  16. macrumors 68020

    sparkleytone

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2001
    Location:
    Greensboro, NC
    #16
    i believe that the royalties for firewire have been significantly diminished if not completely done away with by now. i do know that the Firewire SDK is public source for the taking. So your point is basically lost.
     
  17. macrumors 68000

    e-coli

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2002
    #17
    I have yet to see a camcorder with a USB or serial port. Firewire isn't going anywhere.

    It amazes me that all camcorders have Firewire, but most PC's don't. i guess that means most PC users arren't able to import or edit their movies.
     
  18. macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2008
    #18
    (Bringing back an old thread.) The truth is that FireWire is vastly inferior to any USB connection for everyday use. Here are the reasons why:

    1) Apple totes FireWire's support of hot-plugging, but hot-plugging FireWire devices is extremely risky for the device because the design of the plug allows for shorts to happen on the connection if the plug is not inserted perfectly. You run the risk of damaging your video camera, your audio interface, or your 1 TB hard drive containing your life's work.

    2) Apple totes FireWire's support of daisy chaining devices, but this concept is flawed and impractical for many power-hungry FireWire devices. The fact is that performance suffers on the host device in particular, and while this may not be a problem for hard drives where only things like read/write speed are affected, it certainly is an issue when, for example, your audio interface suddenly can't handle the buffer at typical sample rates.

    3) FireWire interfaces are notorious for failing when multiple devices are plugged in. Devices receive fluctuating streams of power and may not maintain an adequate signal, especially when one device is switched off or another device plugged into the interface is switched on. It's almost as if all the FireWire ports are acting as one, and in order to do anything simple such as switching off a device, you absolutely must turn off the computer and switch off every device, lest you spoil the other devices with power surges, etc.

    Such problems exist for devices which conform to FireWire standard—that is to say, the problems are not caused by the devices but rather by FireWire's inferior engineering.
     
  19. macrumors 68020

    P-Worm

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2002
    Location:
    Salt Lake City, UT
    #19
    I have never heard of this ever happening. Do you have a source?

    Are you trying to convince me that USB is better in this regard?

    Again, I haven't heard of this. Source?

    What are you, an Intel employee? For one thing, it's weird to resurrect such a ridiculously old thread (6 years! Wow, that might be a record!). For another thing, you fail to mention USB's faults such as sustained data rate.

    And this is your first and only post so far on the boards? I think I smell troll...

    P-Worm
     
  20. macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2008
    #20
    Here are a few:

    http://lowendmac.com/misc/03/0421.html

    http://forums.macosxhints.com/archive/index.php/t-67251.html

    http://createdigitalmotion.com/2007...n-legends-hotplugging-firewire-kills-cameras/

    http://www.sounddevices.com/notes/recorders/file-transfer/firewire-hot-plugging/

    And interestingly enough, a source from this very forum:

    http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=545618

    I'm merely pointing out that it's irresponsible for a company to push unreliable, unpredictable features onto new technology in a world where technological advances equate to advances in reliability and predictability.

    Here's one about a G5: http://www.macintouch.com/readerreports/powermacg5/topic4147.html

    I was in the studio recently with an engineer using a G4, and the problem associated with plugging multiple devices into the same interface occurred when he had multiple FireWire hard drives plugged. The 500GB MyBook drive was not receiving power from the machine; he had to reboot his computer, which solved the problem.

    I happened upon this post when trying to solve some of my own recent problems with—surprise—my audio interface, my 500 GB hard drive, and my video camera. I'm dumbfounded at how people jump on the FireWire bandwagon when considering that proper FireWire functionality is contingent upon things which are often times outside the user's control, not to mention outside the user's care (e.g. plugging in a 6-pin connector slightly offset in one direction such that a short occurs).

    Mac users and PC users each have their own separate problems, but it bothers me when one group purposely overlooks their own problems in order to feel better than the other group.

    Furthermore, even if I were an Intel employee (which I'm not :)), I'm unsure how that is even remotely relevant considering that Apple now uses Intel processors.
     
  21. macrumors 68020

    localoid

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2007
    Location:
    America's Third World
    #21
    Citing problems that recording studio was having with a G4...?

    That's ancient history... :rolleyes:
     
  22. macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2008
    #22
    Considering that FireWire was developed in '95, you'd think that almost a decade later with the G4 they would have had such problems solved.
     
  23. macrumors 68020

    localoid

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2007
    Location:
    America's Third World
    #23
    What's next -- a debate about the Ford Model T being a better car than the Model A?

    Trying citing something regarding Firewire "problems" from this century if you want a meaningful debate.
     
  24. macrumors 6502a

    BittenApple

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2008
    #24
    I work as IT for a very big university in northern california. Out of all the MacPro motherboards (and the iMacs we have for the labs), we never had USB fail on them, only firewire.
     
  25. macrumors 68020

    localoid

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2007
    Location:
    America's Third World
    #25
    So would you like for Apple to drop the Ethernet port on its computers and eliminate that "redundant" port? After all you could just plug in a USB ethernet adapter if you needed to use "old fashioned" wired networking....
     

Share This Page