Five year old kills 2 year old sister with 'Toy' rifle

Discussion in 'Politics, Religion, Social Issues' started by sim667, May 3, 2013.

  1. macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2010
    #1
    Link

    So this should fuel the gun debate a bit more......

    Its a .22 air rifle as far as I'm aware, we're allowed those in the UK, but its the type of thing teenage boys want and the parents wont let them have.

    However I think marketing one as "My first rifle" specifically for kids is pretty abhorrent, and clearly it hasn't been used to teach safe gun usage in this case.

    [​IMG]
     
  2. macrumors 601

    eawmp1

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2008
    Location:
    FL
    #2
    1) .22 caliber air rifles are not toys and can be lethal
    2) failure of parenting in not securing the weapon
    3) this is why pediatricians ask about firearms in household
     
  3. macrumors 65816

    Zombie Acorn

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2009
    Location:
    Toronto, Ontario
    #3
    No gun is a toy and I doubt it was ever described as such. I also don't think these are air rifles, from the description it sounds like just a miniature 22 rifle. Can't really confirm that as the Crickett site is completely gone.

    I will say that its fairly normal in some states to get kids started early, although a 22 at 5 yo seems a bit early to me. I had a bb gun when I was around 8 and a shotgun around 11 iirc.
     
  4. thread starter macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2010
    #4
    I just assumed it was a .22 air rifle. Even worse if its an actual rifle.
     
  5. macrumors 68030

    .Andy

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2004
    Location:
    The Mergui Archipelago
  6. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    May 27, 2009
    Location:
    FL
    #6
    Doesn't matte what it was. This is not a GUN issue it is a PARENTING issue.
     
  7. macrumors demi-god

    Shrink

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2011
    Location:
    New England, USA
    #7
    While I might argue that it is both, I would agree that the parenting issue is primary here.

    I will go out on a limb, brave soul that I am, and predict that this thread will end up being another gun thread.:p
     
  8. AhmedFaisal, May 3, 2013
    Last edited by a moderator: Nov 16, 2013

    Guest

  9. macrumors G5

    ucfgrad93

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2007
    Location:
    Colorado
    #9
    Agreed, that rifle shouldn't have been readily accessible to a 5 year old.
     
  10. macrumors 6502a

    b-rad g

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2010
    #10
    Exactly! The children should have absolutley no access to them unless under undivided parental supervision. Period.
     
  11. macrumors 65816

    dec.

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2012
    Location:
    Toronto
    #11
    I respect different cultures and personal freedoms and I'm not judging (especially as there are many Americans on this site) but I find the whole mentality of wanting to teach a 5 year old kid the responsible handling of a gun or rifle (btw. how did that work out?) extremely bizarre.

    Is that Crickett ad some photoshopped satire?
     
  12. macrumors Nehalem

    GoCubsGo

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2005
    #12
    It doesn't appear to be. In fact, it appears it may very well be their website.
    http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/caroline-starks-brother-5-accidentally-1863586
     
  13. macrumors 68040

    MonkeySee....

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2010
    Location:
    UK
    #13
    **** me.

    How a gun can be marketed for a kid is ridiculous. Sorry America, I do like your country but it has some ****ed up laws.
     
  14. macrumors G3

    Huntn

    Joined:
    May 5, 2008
    Location:
    The Misty Mountains
    #14
    The idea is that the kid would be supervised while in possession of the gun... :p
    This is where an adult supervisory penalty could be appropriate, not just chock it up to an accident.
     
  15. macrumors 68020

    ugahairydawgs

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2010
    #15
    This is terribly tragic, but in no way should be an indictment of the gun manufacturer. Teaching children from an early age about gun responsibility is a good idea, provided the parents are doing a good job of teaching their kid(s).

    In this story it seems like the breakdown was with the parent. The gun was not even remotely close to properly stored and was left sitting at ground level....loaded. I'm sure nobody here will beat themselves up over this more than the parents, but there should be some sort of criminal negligence charges filed over this.
     
  16. macrumors G3

    roadbloc

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2009
    Location:
    UK
    #16
    Seriously America? Guns for kids? I swear you guys don't do a thing help yourselves. I'd say the parents deserve this to happen to them for being so ****ing dumb. Maybe next time they'll think before handing over guns to kids. It isn't as if its any better when adults have guns.

    Pathetic. Really pathetic.
     
  17. macrumors G3

    Huntn

    Joined:
    May 5, 2008
    Location:
    The Misty Mountains
    #17
    I wish more of this type of indignation popped up on our side of the pond. Twenty six killed at school and a lobby with its tag along paranoids launch to defend gun freedom (Second Amendment rights) which is oh so much more important than the associated collateral damage. :(
     
  18. macrumors 68020

    ugahairydawgs

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2010
    #18
    You're right....two nuts start shooting and we should just scrap part of the Constitution as a result.

    And this from someone who has no use for guns.
     
  19. thread starter macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2010
    #19
    Well its both a gun and a parenting issue.

    When guns are so commonplace that gun manufacturers think its socially acceptable to target advertising toward children for weapons that fire live rounds, then its just as much a "gun" problem as it is a problem of a parent thinking its a good idea to buy a 5 year old a gun.

    The only countries in the world where it seems to be accepted that children may have access to guns is America and a number of African countries. Only one out of them doesn't have warlords, undertake ethnic cleansing or make routine use of child soldiers.

    But of course American society is so sociopathic about making use of their "Civil Liberties" from an outdated piece of paper set in a time when you actually needed a gun to protect your life, they tend to forget the levels of morality in other places where the rest of the world thinks is comparable.

    Children in Africa carry guns and become child soldiers become ruthless men force them to with Violence. Children in America carry guns because ruthless corporations making millions of pounds from sales sell parents the idea of buying their children a gun in order to line their pockets and ensure the continuation of society's attitude that weaponry only fit for warfare should be in the hands of the public.

    ----------

    So is a meth dealer openly advertised meth to your kids, and they died from smoking it youd be like "Yeah its not the meth dealers fault, its mine"

    Brilliant. :rolleyes:

    ----------

    So is a meth dealer openly advertised meth to your kids, and they died from smoking it youd be like "Yeah its not the meth dealers fault, its mine"

    Brilliant. :rolleyes:
     
  20. macrumors 65816

    vrDrew

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2010
    Location:
    Midlife, Midwest
    #20
    Really?

    There is no way possible that a child younger than ten or twelve ever ought to be handling any gun that doesn't have a cork and a string coming out of it.

    I wouldn't let a child younger than that handle a sharp kitchen knife. And for this manufacturer to market their product to children barely older than toddlers is frankly disgraceful. We managed to outlaw lawn darts because they were fundamentally dangerous toys - why we let companies sell explicitly lethal weapons as "toys" is completely beyond me.

    Take a look at their marketing video, paying special attention to the ~ 20 second mark, where Mom manages to point the barrel at her son's head. Teaching gun safety, foresooth.....
     
  21. macrumors 68020

    ugahairydawgs

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2010
    #21
    You have an example for something that isn't illegal?

    Again....if you want to see marketing guns for kids outlawed, then you are free to start your own legislative push. But for now it is legal and the process still requires an adult to make the purchase. So at the end of the day this is entirely on the parent to monitor and educate their children.....which obviously did not happen here.

    If a kid gets type-2 diabetes from eating a steady diet of Snickers and McDonalds it isn't the fault of the people making the food. Its on the person that fed the crap to the child. Same holds true here.
     
  22. macrumors 601

    Moyank24

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2009
    Location:
    in a New York State of mind
    #22
    There are just too many accidental deaths because irresponsible people have been allowed to purchase guns.

    I just think there has to be some way to make it harder for everyone to purchase guns. I shouldn't be allowed to go into a store and purchase a deadly weapon to hand over to my kid - with no knowledge of how to even shoot a gun myself.

    I've always believed that banning things like AR-15's proabably isn't going to stop the mass killings that seem to be a normal thing in the US. But by making the process harder, we should be able to stop some of these accidental shootings.

    Everytime someone has compared cars to guns, I've always come back with the idea of licensing, registering, and renewing some type of gun license. It's better for everyone if someone who is walking out with a gun has shown that they are able to understand how to safely handle it and store it.
     
  23. macrumors 65816

    vrDrew

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2010
    Location:
    Midlife, Midwest
    #23
    If I momentarily turn my back, and my child scarfs down a couple of Snickers bars, they aren't going to develop Diabetes before the wrappers hit the floor. But if that same kid pulls the trigger on his Crickett rifle while I'm getting the mail or cutting the lawn, the effects can be instantly and irreversibly tragic.

    I don't want to see rifles or handguns banned, any more than I want to see sharp kitchen knives banned. But, just for once, I'd like to see the "pro-gun" people here try and take a responsible stand and condemn the shameless and irresponsible profiteering that led - directly - to this sort of tragedy.
     
  24. macrumors 6502a

    DesertEagle

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2012
    Location:
    /home @ 127.0.0.1
    #24
    Am I the only one who's wondering how the gun could even be loaded while in the hands of the boy?
     
  25. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2010
    Location:
    This is the place
    #25
    I'm under the impression some states have banned pediatricians from asking about firearms. You know, stamp on the first amendment to protect the ever precious second amendment. And I'm nearly certain the NRA is pushing for the other 47 states to get on board. Can't have enough guns in this country, including in the hands of "youth".

    "Despite this evidence, in 2011, Florida passed legislation, the Firearms Owners’ Privacy Act, making it illegal for a doctor to conduct preventive screening by asking families about guns in the home — essentially “gagging” health care providers. Under the aegis of the Second Amendment, the First Amendment rights and the Hippocratic responsibilities of physicians were challenged. In response, the AAP’s Florida chapter brought suit, and in June 2012, Miami-based U.S. District Judge Marcia Cooke issued a permanent injunction banning the state from enforcing the law. Governor Rick Scott has appealed the ruling, and similar bills have been introduced in three additional states."
     

Share This Page