For all those thinking about going [back] to the Dark Side...

Discussion in 'General Mac Discussion' started by idea_hamster, Jul 17, 2003.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. macrumors 65816

    idea_hamster

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2003
    Location:
    NYC, or thereabouts
    #1
  2. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2002
    Location:
    CA
    #2
    We all know now where homeland security is heading

    " The disclosure was unusually embarrassing for Microsoft because it demonstrated the first such serious flaw in the company’s powerful new computer server software, billed as its safest ever.
    The software is aimed at large corporate customers and was the first product sold under a high-profile “Trustworthy Computing” initiative organized last year by Microsoft founder Bill Gates.
    "

    "The announcement came one day after the Department of Homeland Security announced that it awarded a five-year, $90-million contract for Microsoft to supply all its most important desktop and server software for about 140,000 computers inside the new federal agency."
     
  3. macrumors 603

    solvs

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2002
    Location:
    LaLaLand, CA
    #3
    I have one thing to say to that...

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

    Stoopid M$. Stoopid government. Shoulda' bought Macs.
     
  4. macrumors 68020

    mymemory

    Joined:
    May 9, 2001
    Location:
    Miami
    #4
    Two things about this.

    1. I do not care about Windows, security in Windows is not even a problem for me because there are 300 things I do not like about the system any way.

    2. We have to realize that the security problems in Windows doesn't mean OSX is more secure, it means that Windows is more attacked than OSX. I wonder how secure OSX is any way, I bet is not more secure than windows and is equally hackeable. M$ is a very medicre company.
     
  5. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2002
    Location:
    CA
    #5
    Unix Systems are more stable than bloated winblows

    I didnt hear this many security warning against any unix os - eg: Sun Solaris or AIX. The problem is 'buffer overflow' and it is deep inside. It will take many years to patch the big hole. They are improving. Did u ever notice that Winxp's automatic software update pop up every day? Most of them are just security fixes.
     
  6. thread starter macrumors 65816

    idea_hamster

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2003
    Location:
    NYC, or thereabouts
    #6
    Re: Two things about this.

    Basically, I agree with the gist of your post, but...

    My title was designed to direct this as a reminder to people who were posting that they were going to buy Dell laptops because there was no 15" PB update, or a similar move. Not confrontational, but rather a reminder maybe of why they left.

    Also, while I'm no expert, I have to think that *nix-based systems have to have more diagnostic tools for finding security flaws than Windows. (Remember the much-dreaded release of "Satan"? That was a program to detect security flaws in Unix systems.) With tools like these, there really must be fewer holes.

    Also, it wasn't clear to me why your statement that M$ is a mediocre company is a sequitur to your contention that we don't know just how vulnerable OS X is.

    (Oh, and if you read the article, an analyst said that until it was fixed, a system was "like swiss cheese". That's not small potatoes.)
     
  7. macrumors 603

    solvs

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2002
    Location:
    LaLaLand, CA
    #7
    As a person who does use Windows as well (unfortunetely), I can tell you that it is much less secure than OS X. Unix isn't perfect, and neither is OS X, but Windows is, and always has been, incredibly insecure. Even if it wasn't as popular as it is. Ask any computer security expert.

    Hackers don't use Unix and Linux because it's less popular.

    You can always find holes, but it's easier on Windows machine, and MUCH harder on *nix.
     
  8. macrumors 68030

    medea

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2002
    Location:
    Madison, Wi
    #8
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page