Foxconn Set to Deploy Robots to Help Assemble the iPhone

Discussion in 'MacRumors.com News Discussion' started by MacRumors, Jul 6, 2014.

  1. macrumors bot

    MacRumors

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2001
    #1
    [​IMG]


    At a recent shareholder meeting, Foxconn CEO Terry Gou announced that the company will soon deploy robots to help assemble devices, noting that Apple will be the first company to use the service, reports IT Home (Google Translate, via GSMDome).

    [​IMG]
    Named "Foxbots", each robot will be able to assemble an average of 30,000 devices and costs anywhere from $20,000 to $25,000 to make. Gou stated that the assembly devices are undergoing their final testing phase, as Foxconn plans to deploy 10,000 robots to its factories.

    Foxconn has been Apple's longtime primary partner in assembling its iPhones, iPads, and iPods. In 2011, it was reported that Foxconn would be replacing a portion of its workers with 1 million robots, although it was not clear at the time how many jobs would be replaced by the robots.

    As a part of its 2013 10-K annual report last year, Apple also revealed that it was investing a record $10.5 billion on advanced supply chain technology, with some of that investment going towards advanced machinery including assembly robots. A report earlier this year noted that Apple would be moving production of iPhone batteries to automated lines, allowing suppliers to reduce manpower demand and shift resources towards production efforts on other parts.

    Foxconn has recently ramped up its production efforts ahead of the launch of Apple's iPhone 6 this fall, with the company bringing on 100,000 new workers to help assemble the iPhone 6. Production of the new device is reportedly set to ramp up next month ahead of a launch around September. The iPhone 6 is expected to come in two sizes of 4.7-inches and 5.5-inches, and feature a thinner profile, an improved camera, a faster A8 processor, and more.

    Article Link: Foxconn Set to Deploy Robots to Help Assemble the iPhone
     
  2. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2011
    #2
    Doubling down on security? Goodbye finished part leaks? Let's hope so... Cool stuff.
     
  3. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2006
    #3
    I wonder what will happen to the employment situation in China when Chinese factories start using robots instead of workers.
     
  4. macrumors 6502a

    bwillwall

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2009
    #4
    Good.. they need to do something.. the conditions aren't great and honestly the production rates and number of failures is still pretty bad.
     
  5. macrumors 68040

    Lesser Evets

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2006
    #5
    This is just the eventuality of industry.

    They just pay them welfare. It works here.
     
  6. macrumors 601

    The Doctor11

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2013
    Location:
    USA
    #6
    Haha so true. I think robots are good. They can make stuff faster so less wait time at launch
     
  7. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2007
    #7
    I don't know which is worse: continuing to pay relatively cruddy wages to workers for boring factory jobs or getting rid of the workers and replacing them with robots.

    I don't understand why each robot can only assemble 30,000 iPhones. What happens after that - do the robots fall apart or are they unionized and they get to retire?

    I also wonder who is designing and who owns these robots - Foxconn or Apple? If it's not Foxconn and the iPhone and/or other Apple products can be completely assembled by robots, then why not have factories around the world (including the U.S.), not just in China?
     
  8. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2011
    #8
    10,000 robots? And who is assembling those robots?

    It would be interesting if those robots could also assemble themselves, and not just iPhones. Although even if they don't, they probably can't, that means less humans working there, for sure. Higher yield, less cost is their goal.
     
  9. macrumors 65816

    Eduardo1971

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2006
    Location:
    Lost Angeles, Ca. usa
    #9
    Somewhere in China a child must be weeping at this announcement.
    :cool:
     
  10. macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    May 25, 2009
  11. macrumors 68000

    Crosscreek

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2013
    Location:
    Margarittaville
    #11
    Really behind times not to have fully automated systems. No employee problems and better consistent quality are the benefits. They will work 24/7 and only require stocking which could be automated also.
     
  12. macrumors 6502a

    PowerBook-G5

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2013
    Location:
    It's only me, PowerBook-G5.
    #12
    Somebody else posted this a while ago, but here we go:
     

    Attached Files:

  13. macrumors 68030

    macs4nw

    #13
    Yup, robots are less inclined to tattle, or take pictures of their handywork...lol
     
  14. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2014
    #14
    Hope this is the first step to Apple brining back U.S. Based production. Would save a bit in shipping, export control costs, and have a better ecology of high tech companies to support the robots.
     
  15. macrumors 68020

    jayducharme

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2006
    Location:
    The thick of it
    #15
    They also won't unionize or demand better working conditions.
     
  16. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2003
    Location:
    Tempe, AZ
    #16
    it seems like there's some data missing here...

    30,000 devices... in ... what? hours? days? weeks? months? does it drop dead after the 30,000th device, like some kind of strange death mechanism, before it realizes its leading a hollow, meaningless existence and offs itself by by plugging itself into a counterfeit chinese wall charger and exploding? Or is it like a Replicant out of Blade Runner, implanted with the memories of a dead assembly line worker in order for it to not question its purpose in life, and after 30,000 devices assembled, it has to be programmed to self-destruct before it realizes its place and rises up against its human oppressors?

    do tell more...
     
  17. macrumors G5

    gnasher729

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2005
    #17
    All the posters who complain all the time that Apple shouldn't use "slave labour" in China will surely be rejoicing. Or maybe it will be a wakeup call for them that these are jobs that people actually want.
     
  18. macrumors 6502

    markosb

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2010
    #18
    Are they made of Aluminum?
     
  19. macrumors 6502a

    PowerBook-G5

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2013
    Location:
    It's only me, PowerBook-G5.
    #19
    Nice one
     
  20. macrumors 65816

    MacSince1990

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2009
    #20
    This may be the most asinine comment I've ever read on MacRumors.
     
  21. macrumors regular

    Cythth

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2013
    Location:
    Lake Jackson, TX
    #21
    Good. Remove human error by removing the human.
     
  22. macrumors 6502a

    NY Guitarist

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2011
    #22
    Soon... robots building robots, until they become self-aware and decide humans are no longer necessary.

    -> Obligatory reference to 'SkyNet' getting closer to reality.
     
  23. macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2014
    #23
    I guess you never really thought much of Samuel Clemens writing style.
     
  24. macrumors 601

    HobeSoundDarryl

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2004
    Location:
    Hobe Sound, FL (20 miles north of Palm Beach)
    #24
    Replacing some of the cheapest human labor in the world with robots... why do this? While it could be some kind of quality thing where the needed robots will do the job better than humans, I suspect it's a cost thing- the robots will reduce the cost of labor. Conceptually, that would mean that either a) the price of what the robots make could come down and Apple could still get its margin or b) the price of what the robots make could stay the same or go up and increase Apple's margin. I wonder which one Apple will choose.
     
  25. macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2014
    #25
    I guess you never really thought much of Samuel Clemens' writing style.
     

Share This Page