France Asks EU to Examine Apple's Removal of AppGratis From the App Store

Discussion in 'MacRumors.com News Discussion' started by MacRumors, Apr 11, 2013.

  1. macrumors bot

    MacRumors

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2001
    #1
    [​IMG]


    [​IMG]
    France will ask the European Commission for increased regulation following Apple's decision to remove AppGratis from the App Store for violating its developer guidelines, Reuters reports.
    Apple has come under European Commission scrutiny in the past for its requirements around the pricing of ebooks, a subject that the United States is currently prosecuting Apple for as well.

    Article Link: France Asks EU to Examine Apple's Removal of AppGratis From the App Store
     
  2. macrumors G4

    daneoni

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2006
    #2
    This should be interesting

    [​IMG]
     
  3. macrumors 68000

    ritmomundo

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2011
    Location:
    Bel Air, CA
    #3
    Fleur Pellerin, junior minister of dark magic.. err, digital economy, sounds like a character from Harry Potter.
     
  4. macrumors 6502

    FirstNTenderbit

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2013
    Location:
    Atlanta
    #4
    Last time I checked, it was Apples' App Store. They own it, they curate it. What is there to examine?
     
  5. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2007
    #5
    'Extremely brutal'? I feel like I have a different definition of brutal than he does.
     
  6. macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2012
    #6
    Every tom and dick started deciding what Apple supposed to do :(
     
  7. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2006
    Location:
    Prestatyn, Wales, UK
    #7
    Since when did the EU rule USA?
     
  8. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2002
    Location:
    So Cal
    #8
    I can see where they might be coming from, it is brutal for Apple to let developers build a business around an app only to have the rug pulled out from under them. Apple has to do a better job of stopping these apps before they gather a significant following.
     
  9. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2011
    #9
    How ignorant of you sir...
     
  10. macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2012
    #10
    Says who....?
     
  11. macrumors G4

    Small White Car

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2006
    Location:
    Washington DC
    #11
    I can promise you that Apple would decide to stop selling iPhones in France before they would give up their currated store.
     
  12. macrumors 68040

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2007
    #12
    I agree in one respect, but in another respect you could turn around and say "Well Windows is Microsoft's operating system, they own it, they are free to stop any non-microsoft application working on it, or anything that competes with them".

    Eventually a government (or more likely, the EU and US combined) will open an antitrust case (just as they did with Microsoft) and Apple will be forced to allow 3rd party app installations. Obviously Apple can do it in such a way that makes it more worthwhile for people to go via their appstore, but it wouldnt be at all surprising to see everyone+dog jump on the bandwagon and open a bunch of stores on the iPhone.

    You cant have a huge marketshare and block competitors from releasing software for your product. Sure, if you're small enough, nobody will care, but sooner or later, someone will challenge it.
     
  13. macrumors 68000

    BC2009

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2009
    #13
    Agreed.... I don't see anybody regulating the largest retailers and telling them they must carry merchandise from certain vendors. If AppGratis wants to continue their middle-man advertising/marketing business then maybe they should do it on another platform like Android.

    Apple is hardly the only platform in town. Nobody forced Costco to carry Apple products when Costco decided that it simply was not profitable for them to waste the floor space on Apple. Apple has similarly decided it was not in their best interest to sell AppGratis on their App Store.
     
  14. macrumors 68040

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2007
    #14
    Since when did a global company not have to heed to global laws?

    Microsoft and Google both had antitrust suits opened by the EU. In Microsofts case they are required to provide a copy of all sourcecode for Windows to both the EU and US Govt.

    ----------

    It depends on the numbers (of which we will likely never know). If it works out that Apple has, for example 70% of the smartphone market, thats called a monopoly. At that point, governments can open a can of worms and demand they open things up to allow competition.
     
  15. macrumors G4

    Small White Car

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2006
    Location:
    Washington DC
    #15
    This is true, but Apple doesn't fit that definition. They don't even hold half the market which I'd call an extremely bare minimum for having this conversation.
     
  16. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2011
    #16
    Last time I checked, the Government has the right to regulate private businesses. Just because a company owns something doesn't mean they can do whatever they want if it harms the public interest. What's there to examine? To see if Apple is using ther extraordinary power in the App Store in any unfair or anti-competitive way (because competition helps the public, and is in the public interest.)
     
  17. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2007
    #17
    Last time I checked, Apple has to abide by the laws of each country and union it operates. Lucky us there is one thing called fair competition, that, at least, the EU cares about (or well... the EU citizens and anyone living in EU soil still benefits from and it's just money what rules laws).
    Also, AppGratis is produced by a French company... hence it makes sense the company seeks for help at all levels and well... there are many, France and EU...

    Maybe you would like to know that Apple operates under EU law when selling anything in the EU ;)
     
  18. macrumors 65816

    dagamer34

    Joined:
    May 1, 2007
    Location:
    Houston, TX
    #18
    Monopolies are not defined by market share but having a dominant influence on others. In the EU, this definition has applied to a company with as little as 39.7% marketshare.

    It's incredibly easy for a company with large marketshare to be a monopoly, but large marketshare != monopoly. Also, they usually have to abuse this power in order for it to be regulated.
     
  19. Moderator

    Nermal

    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2002
    Location:
    Whakatane, New Zealand
    #19
    The key difference is that if one retailer doesn't have the product that you want then you can buy from a retailer that does.

    Apple, on the other hand, actively prevents any other retailer from selling iOS apps.
     
  20. macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2010
    Location:
    America(s)!
    #20
    Whenever I see the EU and Apple in a story I feel compelled to see if the source is The Onion.
     
  21. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2011
    #21
    Retail stores don't have to carry items they they don't want to because those items can be sold at other retail stores. With the App Store, an ios app cannot be sold anywhere else. So if Apple can just determine arbitrarily what apps can and can't be sold, they can effectively destroy the software companies because there is no other market (IOS apps will only work on iOS, and can only be bought from the App Store.) That is extraordinary power, and frankly too much power. I don't get why some people can't see this.
     
  22. macrumors 68030

    mdelvecchio

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2010
    #22
    youre terribly confused about these matters. it is not valid to compare what apple allows in its private & meta app store to microsoft stopping programs from running on your physical PC (which never happened, btw). remember: you can jailbreak and sideload, it's not illegal.

    second, microsoft was sued for using its monopoly in one market (desktop OS) to gain in market (forcing OEMs to use IE or revoke their licenses, not allowing them to bundle Netscape), etc..

    lastly, apple does not have the majority market share in mobile OS, let alone a monopoly. users have plenty of alternatives on the open market.
     
  23. macrumors 6502a

    Satori

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2006
    Location:
    London
    #23
    This could potentially have big consequences for the operation of the AppStore in the EU. If the EU decide that Apple acted anti-competitively they are basically challenging part of the terms and conditions for AppStore developers.

    Lets see what happens...
     
  24. Stella, Apr 11, 2013
    Last edited: Apr 11, 2013

    macrumors 603

    Stella

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2003
    Location:
    Canada
    #24
    Apple don't make sideloading / jail break very easy...





    Apple have to follow the laws in the countries / Jurisdiction they operate in.

    It may be Apple's store but the above still applies. If some law is being suspected on being breached then an investigation is called for. I suspect this one won't go anywhere.




    I doubt it. The EU / France is not an insignificant market.
     
  25. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2011
    #25
    Apparently, Apple is now the EU's biggest cash-cow and ticket out of this economic depression.
     

Share This Page