G5 1.8 Xbecnch Results

Discussion in 'Macintosh Computers' started by iJon, Aug 28, 2003.

  1. iJon macrumors 604

    iJon

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2002
    #1
    Results 123.30
    System Info
    Xbench Version 1.1
    System Version 10.2.7
    Physical RAM 512 MB
    Model PowerMac7,2
    Processor PowerPC 970 @ 1.80 GHz
    L1 Cache 64K (instruction), 32K (data)
    L2 Cache 512K @ 1800 MHz
    Bus Frequency 900 MHz
    Video Card GeForce FX 5200
    Drive Type ST3160023AS
    CPU Test 71.79
    GCD Recursion 71.57 2.80 Mops/sec
    Floating Point Basic 210.48 748.54 Mflop/sec
    AltiVec Basic 77.23 1.12 Gflop/sec
    vecLib FFT 29.30 451.58 Mflop/sec
    Floating Point Library 259.53 10.39 Mops/sec
    Thread Test 83.45
    Computation 64.48 519.47 Kops/sec, 4 threads
    Lock Contention 118.21 1.48 Mlocks/sec, 4 threads
    Memory Test 245.05
    System 184.88
    Allocate 312.76 105.45 Kalloc/sec
    Fill 131.66 1048.05 MB/sec
    Copy 184.01 920.05 MB/sec
    Stream 363.29
    Copy 361.83 1475.61 MB/sec [G5]
    Scale 339.00 1408.26 MB/sec [G5]
    Add 376.60 1589.20 MB/sec [G5]
    Triad 378.56 1558.09 MB/sec [G5]
    Quartz Graphics Test 165.87
    Line 187.15 4.76 Klines/sec [50% alpha]
    Rectangle 172.63 12.14 Krects/sec [50% alpha]
    Circle 182.49 4.21 Kcircles/sec [50% alpha]
    Bezier 157.73 1.71 Kbeziers/sec [50% alpha]
    Text 139.11 2.27 Kchars/sec
    OpenGL Graphics Test 205.34
    Spinning Squares 205.34 143.69 frames/sec
    User Interface Test 148.19
    Elements 148.19 50.42 refresh/sec
    Disk Test 109.52
    Sequential 114.17
    Uncached Write 140.58 55.96 MB/sec [4K blocks]
    Uncached Write 136.36 53.23 MB/sec [256K blocks]
    Uncached Read 78.24 12.39 MB/sec [4K blocks]
    Uncached Read 128.11 51.76 MB/sec [256K blocks]
    Random 105.22
    Uncached Write 99.97 1.43 MB/sec [4K blocks]
    Uncached Write 108.36 24.44 MB/sec [256K blocks]
    Uncached Read 100.08 0.66 MB/sec [4K blocks]
    Uncached Read 113.76 23.41 MB/sec [256K blocks]

    iJon
     
  2. MacsRgr8 macrumors 604

    MacsRgr8

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2002
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    #2
    uJon are the first :cool:

    Any Dual 1.42 GHz G4 XBench results for comparison?
     
  3. Dont Hurt Me macrumors 603

    Dont Hurt Me

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2002
    Location:
    Yahooville S.C.
    #3
    i have posted this before but what the heck, a 1.4 single g4 in my 733 with 10.2.6 and 1 gig of mem received a xbench of 114. for comparison purpose if anyone is interested and thanks to ijon for the post.
     
  4. MacsRgr8 macrumors 604

    MacsRgr8

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2002
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    #4
    Here's someones... Dual 1.42 G4

    131.03

    System Info
    Xbench Version
    1.1
    System Version
    10.2.6
    Physical RAM
    512 MB
    Model
    PowerMac3,6
    Processor
    PowerPC G4x2 @ 1.42 GHz
    Version
    7455 (Apollo) v3.3
    L1 Cache
    32K (instruction), 32K (data)
    L2 Cache
    256K @ 1417 MHz
    L3 Cache
    2048K @ 237 MHz
    Bus Frequency
    167 MHz
    Video Card
    ATY,RV250 (ATI Radeon 9000)
    Drive Type
    ST3120024A
    CPU Test
    89.86
    GCD Recursion
    176.91
    6.91 Mops/sec
    Floating Point Basic
    176.43
    627.45 Mflop/sec
    AltiVec Basic
    175.94
    2.56 Gflop/sec
    vecLib FFT
    30.30
    466.96 Mflop/sec
    Floating Point Library
    177.44
    7.10 Mops/sec
    Thread Test
    169.41
    Computation
    169.67
    1.37 Mops/sec, 4 threads
    Lock Contention
    169.15
    2.12 Mlocks/sec, 4 threads
    Memory Test
    164.24
    System
    187.27
    Allocate
    176.62
    59.55 Kalloc/sec
    Fill
    334.12—>
    2659.61 MB/sec
    Copy
    135.77
    678.85 MB/sec
    Stream
    146.26
    Copy
    146.54
    597.61 MB/sec [altivec]
    Scale
    148.69
    617.68 MB/sec [altivec]
    Add
    149.82
    632.21 MB/sec [altivec]
    Triad
    140.36
    577.70 MB/sec [altivec]
    Quartz Graphics Test
    158.74
    Line
    159.52
    4.06 Klines/sec [50% alpha]
    Rectangle
    133.27
    9.38 Krects/sec [50% alpha]
    Circle
    175.73
    4.05 Kcircles/sec [50% alpha]
    Bezier
    172.51
    1.87 Kbeziers/sec [50% alpha]
    Text
    160.29
    2.61 Kchars/sec
    OpenGL Graphics Test
    138.90
    Spinning Squares
    138.90
    97.20 frames/sec
    User Interface Test
    161.19
    Elements
    161.19
    54.85 refresh/sec
    Disk Test
    94.33
    Sequential
    109.13
    Uncached Write
    104.76
    41.71 MB/sec [4K blocks]
    Uncached Write
    104.19
    40.67 MB/sec [256K blocks]
    Uncached Read
    130.72
    20.69 MB/sec [4K blocks]
    Uncached Read
    101.40
    40.97 MB/sec [256K blocks]
    Random
    83.07
    Uncached Write
    58.19
    0.83 MB/sec [4K blocks]
    Uncached Write
    93.32
    21.05 MB/sec [256K blocks]
    Uncached Read
    95.64
    0.63 MB/sec [4K blocks]
    Uncached Read
    102.13
    21.02 MB/sec [256K blocks]
     
  5. MacAztec macrumors 68040

    MacAztec

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2001
    Location:
    San Luis Obispo, CA
    #5
    xBench

    I think xBench is full of crap when using the G5. It just doesn't seem to be that a single 1.4GHz G4 can just barely be slower then a 1.8GHz G5,
     
  6. MacsRgr8 macrumors 604

    MacsRgr8

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2002
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    #6
    Ooops... sorry, Don't Hurt Me. Didn't pay enough attention..... :(
     
  7. Freg3000 macrumors 68000

    Freg3000

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2002
    Location:
    New York
    #7
    It's not only slow when compared to the G4, it is also slow compared to the lower clocked G5!

    http://www.chaosmint.com/powermac-g5-16/

    the 1.6 Ghz G5 scored 135! Over ten points higher than the 1.8 Ghz model. Something is screwy.....I don't trust xBench anymore.
     
  8. Dont Hurt Me macrumors 603

    Dont Hurt Me

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2002
    Location:
    Yahooville S.C.
    #8
    the g4 has a l3 the g5 dont, what i would like to see are frame rates of our favorite games, now that will tell the story. the dual machine is way ahead but the singles are not and this shows it. i think apple should have had 1 single and 2 duallies. anyways apple wont have to worry about moto' stagnation anymore.
     
  9. MacsRgr8 macrumors 604

    MacsRgr8

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2002
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    #9
    Quoting you again here...

    I totally agree. The difference between a Single 1.6 and Dual 2.0 GHz G5 is enormous... Personally I would have like to have seen the Dual 1.8 Ghz G5 alongside the single 1.8.
    I have a Dual 1.25 GHz G4 now, and getting a single 1.8 GHz G5 doesn't seem such a leap. I know about the FSB, S-ATA, and so on, but still.... no L3 cache... no Dual..... <errrr... not even VPC :D >
     
  10. iJon thread starter macrumors 604

    iJon

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2002
    #10
    this is gonna be sold soon im gonna put panther on here tomorrow (7b49) and see how it performs. as for my thoughts on the powermac, its huge when you walk up to it, but then after playing with it a while. things do feel real snappy with just everyday things like clicking and stuff, and this only has the base amount of ram. i cant see why anyone would leave the side door on. i really like the window because the inside of this computer is very eye pleasing. fans are quiet. it also wouldnt be hard at all to put a light in this thing. it could fit at least a foot long cold cathode tube, run it to the back of the case, behind the motherboard up the case and come out the hold with the 4 pin power connector and share it with the cd rom. all in all, a beatiful machine, if there are any questions let me know, this is a demo model "I" am in control of so i can do anything I want, just let me know.

    iJon
     
  11. adamfilip macrumors 6502a

    adamfilip

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2003
    Location:
    burlington, Ontario canada
  12. iJon thread starter macrumors 604

    iJon

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2002
    #12
    explain to me what needs to be done, is this a program i keep hearing about?

    edit: well im leaving in about 10 minutes and i have way to much homework tonight to come back and play, ill come by tomorrow after school and do whatever you want, pictures, movies, you name it i can do it...i think :)

    iJon
     
  13. Freg3000 macrumors 68000

    Freg3000

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2002
    Location:
    New York
    #13
    Get the frame rates of UT2003 and Quake 3 at varying resolutions please. :)

    Thanks.
     
  14. adamfilip macrumors 6502a

    adamfilip

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2003
    Location:
    burlington, Ontario canada
    #14
  15. iJon thread starter macrumors 604

    iJon

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2002
    #15
    well i dont have ut2003, i have the discs though, but if someone can send me a crack to install and try i will, testing purposes only ;) Quake i believe i can do. I can also Warcraft 3, but we all know that will run more than fine on this computer. umm i have RTCW and thats all i can think of now. UT2003 is probably the only one you guys care about. PM with the crack if you have one.

    edit: another cool thing, when you turn this computer to sleep EVERYTHING turns off, fans and everything, real cool. then when you turn it on its like a car, fans rev up and slow back down and then you cant hear anything again.

    iJon
     
  16. adamfilip macrumors 6502a

    adamfilip

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2003
    Location:
    burlington, Ontario canada
  17. iJon thread starter macrumors 604

    iJon

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2002
    #17
    couple of seconds.

    iJon
     
  18. adamfilip macrumors 6502a

    adamfilip

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2003
    Location:
    burlington, Ontario canada
  19. iJon thread starter macrumors 604

    iJon

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2002
    #19
    havent tried, but please rack up the questions, at 430 CTS i will answer all your questions.

    iJon
     
  20. MrMacMan macrumors 604

    MrMacMan

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2001
    Location:
    1 Block away from NYC.
    #20
    Wow, nice man.

    Nice.

    xBench sucks now, such a varying in scores... bah!

    Get some quake or something...

    iJon you can also test the demo...

    Or... You have a Private message.
     
  21. G5orbust macrumors 65816

    G5orbust

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2002
    #21
    strange.... I got a 126 on Xbench 1.1 on a 1.6GHz G5 w/ 256MB of RAM.

    Sorry no specifics, but that is extremely weird. Guess Xbench isnt reliable on the G5s yet.
     

Share This Page