GeForce 5 (Omen)

Discussion in 'Hardware Rumors' started by phil c, Sep 27, 2002.

  1. phil c macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2002
    Location:
    UK
    #1
    Has anyone heard anything solid about this card? i know its supposed to be iminently released but details appear to be very sketchy at best - ideal scenario being nvidia letting mac folks have first crack at it again.......
     
  2. MacBandit macrumors 604

    MacBandit

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2002
    Location:
    Springfield, OR (Home of the Simpsons)
    #2
    http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=5610

    From I've read elsewhere but can't determine where at the moment ATI is suppose to have a second generation of the 9700 due out like a month after the NV30 comes out. So at the moment it looks like ATI is on top for a while.
     
  3. phil c thread starter macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2002
    Location:
    UK
    #3
    ATI getting the upper hand - has the world gone mad?
     
  4. P-Worm macrumors 68020

    P-Worm

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2002
    Location:
    Salt Lake City, UT
    #4
    it sure looks like it! :eek:

    P-Worm
     
  5. MacBandit macrumors 604

    MacBandit

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2002
    Location:
    Springfield, OR (Home of the Simpsons)
    #5
    ATI has had the upper hand in the past and once again has it for about a month now. That's how long the ATI9700 has been shipping for the PC.
     
  6. phil c thread starter macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2002
    Location:
    UK
    #6
    card technology seams to change so fast now it makes the computer upgrde market look positively stable - where do you draw the line in the sand and say enough already - can a geforce 5 or ati 9700 really do anything major to improve your current gaming experience that a decent 128mb g4 or 8500 couldnt? and if so is it worth shelling out the extra dosh or just wait a few next big things pass by before reinvesting
     
  7. ericb88 macrumors member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2002
    #7
    its more of a longevity issue, the top fo the line 128mb 8500 that you bought a few months ago will have some trouble running doom3 at all high settings, and who knows how well it will run quake 4 at all. If i get a 9700 now, maybe i wont notice that much of a difference between a gef4 or 8500, but come janaury 2004, when i can run Quake 4 inj 1280x960 (or whatever is above 1024x768) at all hgih settings without a fram skipping ill be happy.
     
  8. rice_web macrumors 6502a

    rice_web

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2001
    Location:
    Minot, North Dakota
    #8
    Games will likely be requiring 128MB of video memory before long. So, even the Radeon 9000 (which isn't a bad video card) has a relatively short life ahead of itself.
     
  9. MacBandit macrumors 604

    MacBandit

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2002
    Location:
    Springfield, OR (Home of the Simpsons)
    #9

    The ATI9700 has 6x AntiAliasing and Anisotropic Filtering and twice the vertex shaders which really make the game look nice. Not to mention the ATI9700 is twice as fast while running all the AA and Anisotropic filtering and everything on as compared with the GeF4 with no filtering on. Oh, and the price will be the same as the current GeF4 when it comes out on the Mac at about $399.

    http://www6.tomshardware.com/graphic/02q3/020718/index.html
     
  10. scem0 macrumors 604

    scem0

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2002
    Location:
    back in NYC!
    #10
    I need a new graphics card. I can't afford one though. Sigh :eek: ....
     
  11. phil c thread starter macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2002
    Location:
    UK
    #11

    Purchasing a video card now for games that wont be on the market for another 14-15 months? - at the current rate of progress well probably be 2 or generations of video card improvement past the 9700 and omen cards by then so there seams to be, as i stated earlier, little point in taking the plunge just yet.
     
  12. phil c thread starter macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2002
    Location:
    UK
    #12

    Purchasing a video card now for games that wont be on the market for another 14-15 months? - at the current rate of progress well probably be 2 or 3 generations of video card improvement past the 9700 and omen cards by then so there seams to be, as i stated earlier, little point in taking the plunge just yet.
     
  13. sturm375 macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2002
    Location:
    Bakersfield, CA
    #13
    AGP is dying

    The NV30 will be the last nVidia offering using AGP. Near the end of '03 they plan on offering the next generation of video card interface. I don't remember the exact marketing name for it, however it's something like Extream PCI. Same principle as AGP, providing a shorter, faster path to the processor, and system RAM.
     
  14. rice_web macrumors 6502a

    rice_web

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2001
    Location:
    Minot, North Dakota
    #14
    Yeah, the faster PCI is moving into server motherboards shortly, and will hit consumers by late 2003, if memory serves. It runs at 100MHz as opposed to the 66MHz that AGP runs at, and the 33MHz that the original PCI runs at.
     
  15. MacBandit macrumors 604

    MacBandit

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2002
    Location:
    Springfield, OR (Home of the Simpsons)
    #15
    AGP works very similar to DDR Ram though in that it is able to send data on both the rising and falling side of the clock cycle. This is what has allowed AGP to gain a speed advantage over PCI in the past.
     
  16. phil c thread starter macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2002
    Location:
    UK
    #16
    so, as i thought, if youve already got a decent spec card - theres not much point and rushing out and buying the next big thing just yet then - unless of course your seriously minted and a marketing mans wet dream.
     
  17. PCUser macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2002
    #17
    There is actually a reason to buy a Radeon 9700 Pro or a GeForce 4 Ti (or the upcoming NV30), and it was already mentioned. The ability to plan current games at high resolutions (1600x1200 or better) with 4x anti-aliasing (and antiscoptric filtering) and STILL have them be playable (75+ FPS). That makes the current games look a helluva lot better then what they do even on a Radeon 8500.

    However, that reason alone may or may not be worth $400.
     
  18. phil c thread starter macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2002
    Location:
    UK
    #18
    its the minted/wet dream scenario after all then
     
  19. Falleron macrumors 68000

    Falleron

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2001
    Location:
    UK
    #19

Share This Page