Getting new lens to replace kit one, any suggestions? Help.

Discussion in 'Digital Photography' started by Dark, Aug 20, 2006.

  1. Dark macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2005
    Location:
    New Jersey
    #1
    Alright, well I have a Digital Rebel XT and im looking to buy a lens to replace the kit one for all around use. I already have a 70-200 F/4L USM Telephoto that I love, but obviously I can only use that under certain conditions. I wanted to get a faster lens, like an F/2.8 but im only 16 and im not made of money.

    I was looking at this: http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller...oughType=search

    I narrowed it down from a bunch and thought that would be a good everyday lens. I would also get the hood for it. I just wanted to know if anyone had it and thought it was good, bad , etc or could recommened anything better in the same price range. Thanks a bunch.
     
  2. cookie1105 macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2006
    Location:
    London, UK
  3. beavo451 macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2006
    #3
    Your link doesn't work for me, but I would suggest the 17-40 f/4L
     
  4. Abstract macrumors Penryn

    Abstract

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2002
    Location:
    Location Location Location
    #5
    Just tell us what you searched for. It'll be easier.

    And before you even tell us, I'm going to recommend a Sigma or Tamron 18-55 mm f/2.8, Sigma 24-70 mm macro lens (which I own), and the Tamron 28-75 mm f2.8 (which is supposed to be fantasmic). You'll save money by not going with Canon, and you'll get a lens that's at least 98% as good as the Canon equivalent, sometimes even better.
     
  5. Grimace macrumors 68040

    Grimace

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2003
    Location:
    with Hamburglar.
    #6
    I have the 17-55mm f/2.8 IS lens (fairly new) - it is simply amazing. Highly recommended.
     
  6. YS2003 macrumors 68020

    YS2003

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2004
    Location:
    Finally I have arrived.....
    #7
    But, isn't it EF-S? If so, you won't be able to use it when you upgrade it to high end SLR camera. Lens wih EF mount would provide more flexibility.
     
  7. Dark thread starter macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2005
    Location:
    New Jersey
    #9
    Haha If I had that money id buy a macbook.

    But yeah does anyone have any advice on the lense i was looking at ...its this just incase that link still doesnt work.

    Canon Zoom Wide Angle-Telephoto EF 24-85mm f/3.5-4.5 USM Autofocus Lens
     
  8. amin macrumors 6502a

    amin

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2003
    Location:
    Boston, MA
    #10
    The OP is 16, says he is on a budget, and is contemplating a $300 lens, so I am going to go out on a limb and guess that the $1150 17-55 IS, and $1400 16-35L lenses recommended above are more than he was thinking of spending.

    The 24-85 lens you linked to is a good lens if you get a good copy, but reportedly Canon's quality control was a bit lacking on this model. If you buy it, make sure you do so from a store with a good return policy. Personally, I don't find 24mm wide enough on the Rebel XT.

    I too have a Rebel XT and 70-200mm f/4L. Recently, I bought a Tamron 17-50mm f2.8, and I can recommend it most highly. At $450, it's a bit more than the Canon to which you linked. Here are the pros and cons of this lens:

    Pros:
    1) Sharp as hell, throughout the zoom range.
    2) Neutral color (some say it has a cast, but they are wrong).
    3) Small and light (makes for a very compact optical powerhouse when combined with the XT)
    4) f2.8 throughout the range
    5) fast, accurate focus
    6) Great resistance to flare and relative lack of vignetting compared with the more expensive Canon equivalent.
    7) Comes with a hood included.

    Cons:
    1) No IS
    2) Bokeh can be not great depending on the shot
    3) Moderate field curvature can cause lack of sharpness in the corners when shooting at large apertures
    4) AF is significantly noisier and slightly slower than Canon's USM.
    5) More susceptible to CA than the Canon.
    6) Theoretical risk that Canon may change their camera body AF software in the future to render third-party lenses such as this one incompatible.

    Here are a couple professional reviews of this lens:
    http://www.photozone.de/8Reviews/lenses/tamron_1750_28/index.htm
    http://www.photo.net/equipment/tamron/17_50_Di/

    The image quality I get from this compact marvel is generally on the same fantastic level as the Canon 70-200 f/4L and Canon 50mm f1.4. If $450 is in your budget, and $1150 is not, I think it is your best option for a kit lens replacement.
     
  9. Grimace macrumors 68040

    Grimace

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2003
    Location:
    with Hamburglar.
    #11
    He has an $800 L lens already -- I didn't know his scale of what expensive means.
     
  10. amin macrumors 6502a

    amin

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2003
    Location:
    Boston, MA
    #12
    The Canon 70-200mm f4L lens he has commonly sells for less than $600. It is the one L lens that can be had in the "consumer" price range. He is contemplating a $300 kit lens replacement while saying he is open to "anything better in the same price range." Perhaps it isn't easy to pinpoint his scale exactly, but I think he gives a decent sense of it.
     
  11. Cloud9 macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2005
    Location:
    between flesh and thought
    #13
    Whoa, What! School me, please.

    Um, I am pretty new to photography, and every penny I am spending right now needs to be an investment into the future. EF, EF-S,- Compatibility issues with better models of canon cameras? I own a 20d, with the kit lense and the Tamron f2.8 28-75 (I think thats the zoom, its out for repair right now.) Can someone explain what I need to pay attention too to make sure that my lenses will be compatible with any other Canon Camera I buy later on.

    Peas and Ques
     
  12. Dark thread starter macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2005
    Location:
    New Jersey
    #14
  13. -hh macrumors 68020

    -hh

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2001
    Location:
    NJ Highlands, Earth
    #15
    I'm not having any success in getting the links to open. Probably a problem on my end, but I think the question is wide angle?

    I've been thinking about going wider because of the cropping issue on the 20D.


    The "biggest bang for the buck" in WA could very well be the Tokina AF 193 19-35mm f/3.5-4.5. Its 35mm equivalent is "only" 31-56mm, but its a good value and its an EF mount.

    I paid over $300 for mine when it first came out; its now only $150. Here's one product review.

    Another possibility could be the Tokina AT-X Pro 124 12-24mm f/4 ($450), which also remains on an EF mount (although a full frame body, it reportedly will vignette when wider than ~16mm). On a crop body, its 12mm would be a ~19mm equivalent. Since I already own the 19-35mm, I'm thinking about picking up this one next.

    Some specific reviews:
    http://portal.chester.sg/content/view/65/2/
    http://www.photo.net/equipment/tokina/12-24-f4/

    A generic WA review:
    http://www.bobatkins.com/photography/reviews/wide-angle-lenses.html
     
  14. Rickay726 macrumors 6502

    Rickay726

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2005
    Location:
    New Jersey
  15. jared_kipe macrumors 68030

    jared_kipe

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2003
    Location:
    Seattle
    #17
    What? You're on a computer forum calling people nerds? Maybe you need to get your irony sense checked out.
     
  16. -hh macrumors 68020

    -hh

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2001
    Location:
    NJ Highlands, Earth
    #18
    Looks like someone left their PC logged in, but unattended :p


    -hh
     
  17. YS2003 macrumors 68020

    YS2003

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2004
    Location:
    Finally I have arrived.....
    #19
    If you stick with EF series lens from Canon, I think your Canon lens should be compatible for higher end cameras such as 1ds, 1d, 5d. EF-S lens cannot be used for those high end units. My 30D can use both EF and EF-S. But, I am not going to buy EF-S lens as it may limit its future usage when I decided to go for upgrade in the future. I also have Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 (I did not get the kit when I bought 30D's body).
     
  18. bigbossbmb macrumors 68000

    bigbossbmb

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2004
    Location:
    Pasadena/Hollywood
    #20
    17-50mm f2.8 Tamron all the way...

    it is just as good as the 28-75 that everyone raves about. great lens at a great price.
     
  19. sjl macrumors 6502

    sjl

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2004
    Location:
    Melbourne, Australia
    #21
    All true. However, in limiting yourself to only EF lenses, you're restricting your focal length ranges; Canon does not make a cheap "standard wide angle" zoom (meaning around the 17-18 mm focal length range) in the EF mount - only in EF-S. The only choices for such a lens in the EF range would be the 16-35mm f/2.8, or the 17-40mm f/4; both of those are overkill for such a job, being designed for wide-angle shots on a 35mm body.

    Having said that, there's nothing wrong with going down that path - just be aware that you are paying a price premium for the possibility of being able to take your lenses with you if you go for a full-frame body. For my money, I'd probably get the 17-85mm, and look at selling it if/when I bought a body that it wouldn't mount on.

    The other point: remember that there are now quite a few Sigma (and probably Tamron) lenses out there designed for the crop bodies as well. In those instances, as I understand it, you don't have the different mount to stop you using those lenses on a full frame body, so you'll see severe vignetting in such a situation (I could be wrong, however). Make sure you check the specs before buying if that's a concern.
     
  20. YS2003 macrumors 68020

    YS2003

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2004
    Location:
    Finally I have arrived.....
    #22
    Those EF lens you menionted are what I am seriously considering to buy. I think both are L lens. The slower lens (f/4) is less expensive than the faster one (f/2.8). I heard EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM is a very capable wide angle zoom lens (which is priced less than the above mentioned L lens). But, EF-S mounting has stopped me from buying that one.

    It is likely good quality lens will outlast the camera body. So, I think it would be good to consider how your current purchases can be used for the future upgrade.
     
  21. cgratti macrumors 6502a

    cgratti

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2004
    Location:
    Central Pennsylvania, USA
    #23
    About $75 - the 50 mm f/1.8. Fast and super sharp pictures. Did I mention it's only about $75?

    Every Canon owner should own the Nifty-Fifty.

    Or

    The Canon 100mm macro, great lens for macro or partraits, and at f/2.8 its pretty fast......
    For something wide, I have the Sigma 10-20 mm, VERY wide and about $440 used....
     
  22. YS2003 macrumors 68020

    YS2003

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2004
    Location:
    Finally I have arrived.....
    #24
    Yeah, Canon 100mm f/2.8 is a very sharp lens. I have not yet done much of macro shots even though I have this already.

    50mm f/1.4 or f/1.8 would be a must-have for Canon SLR owners, as many other people in the know attest. I went with 50mm f/1.4 for extra stop.
     
  23. snap58 macrumors 6502

    snap58

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2006
    Location:
    somewhere in kansas
    #25
    The 1.4 is well worth the extra money, in addition to the extra 2/3 stop (not really one stop), the 8 blade aperture (in lieu of 5 on the 1.8) is a big plus on blurring the backgrounds, plus the manual over ride. It is also as sharp (or sharper) at 2.0 than the 1.8 is at 2.8.
     

Share This Page