Glad the Air doesn't use Sandy Bridge now!

Discussion in 'MacBook Air' started by bri1232001, Jan 31, 2011.

  1. macrumors newbie

    Jan 4, 2011
  2. macrumors Nehalem


    Feb 19, 2005
    While this is already being discussed in another thread, it is funny how glad people are about not having Sandy Bridge where just last week people were still bitching about it. My how the mighty fall.
  3. macrumors 6502a


    Jan 16, 2011
    Ontario, Canada
  4. macrumors newbie

    Jan 30, 2011
    You badly quoted that article. There's a problem with the 6 series chipset in that SATA ports could degrade. Does the Macbook Air even use SATA ports?
  5. macrumors 601


    Sep 19, 2008
    The thing is it's in the chipset released in October 2010. It's not like this is a huge deal. It's not like the CPU themselves are bad. I think this is a bunch of nonsense and a small deal people want to make out to be a huge deal... somehow they're thinking all Sandy Bridge CPUs are junk, not true at all.
  6. Moderator emeritus


    Dec 10, 2008
    The chipsets (Intel 6-series) that this issue affects were released on January 5th, 2011.
  7. macrumors 68030

    May 13, 2010
    Sandy Bridge was shown at CES 2011 and it hasn't been that long since it shipped out. Glad intel caught this before it went to general public for good.

    It's so sad people alway cry about how 13 inch MBP and 13 MBA do not have latest intel chip, and see what happens.

    Apple made a right call last year with 13 MBP. They made a right call about original iphone shouldn't have 3G built in.

    New technologies will have flaws.
  8. macrumors 65816

    May 7, 2009
    Hamilton Island, Whitsundays, QLD Australia
    as noted in the article:

  9. macrumors regular

    Jan 25, 2008
    300 million a small deal? All Sandy Bridge desktop motherboards along with all Sandy Bridge laptops will have to be recalled. I'd call that pretty damned big.

    And to back that up a well established ASUS reseller has confirmed the ASUS G73SW laptop is affected:
  10. Moderator emeritus


    Dec 10, 2008
    For the millionth time, the MR article is WRONG!

  11. macrumors regular

    Dec 3, 2010
    The issue cited by Intel in today's release does not affect notebook chipsets such as those expected to be used in a Sandy Bridge update to Apple's MacBook Pro line, which is also due for an update.

    Update: While initial reports had suggested that the issue is limited to desktop versions of the platform, Cougar Point is in fact used in both desktop and mobile chipsets based on Sandy Bridge, indicating that the recall could also delay availability of refreshed Apple notebooks such as MacBook Pros.
  12. macrumors Penryn


    Mar 23, 2005
    I did not realize the Macbook Air used more than one SATA channel.
  13. macrumors member

    Apr 22, 2010
    Wait, what? 3G was around for years before the iPhone came out. And even if it was less than years old, why was it the right call?
  14. macrumors 68030

    May 13, 2010
    It's not just any 3G. It's AT&T 3G and their network cannot handle all the iphone users. Apple decided to abandon 3G network on first iphone because they believed AT&T network won't be able to handle heavy iphone users and they were worried about battery life was not good enough yet on 3G.
  15. 2IS
    macrumors 68030

    Jan 9, 2011
    I'd rather have a sandy bridge that will get recalled and replaced before I notice any degradation then a C2D that i'll be stuck with until I buy a new laptop.
  16. macrumors 6502a

    neko girl

    Jan 20, 2011
    Original poster, please read up on the issue.
    -It's not a problem with Sandy Bridge. Sandy Bridge is the processor and SATA doesn't connect to it. SATA connects to the IO chipset.
    -It's a degradation issue that affects some, but not all the SATA ports. MacBook Air uses just 1 port.
    -Intel is looking at taking care of this graciously, it seems like, and they've communicated the issue to everyone.
  17. thread starter macrumors newbie

    Jan 4, 2011
    Thank you for clarifying things for me. Intel does seem to be handling the issue professionally in my opinion.

Share This Page