Google Launches First Beta Build of 64-Bit Chrome for Mac

Discussion in 'Mac Blog Discussion' started by MacRumors, Aug 28, 2014.

  1. MacRumors
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors bot

    MacRumors

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2001
    #1
    [​IMG]


    [​IMG]
    Google today announced the launch of the first beta build of 64-bit Chrome for Mac, following the public release of 64-bit Chrome for Windows.

    Earlier this month, Google added 64-bit support to Chrome Canary for OS X, the experimental build of its Chrome web browser, but with this new beta version, testers on the Beta channel will have access to 64-bit Chrome support.

    According to Google, 64-bit support for Chrome will bring several speed and security improvements to the browser, in addition to decreasing the amount of memory it uses.
    64-bit support for the Windows Chrome beta was implemented in July with a stable release coming a a month afterwards, so a stable Mac release could possibly follow a similar timeline, coming in September.

    Article Link: Google Launches First Beta Build of 64-Bit Chrome for Mac
     
  2. lumuba
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2012
  3. locoboi187
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2012
  4. GeneralChang
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2013
    #4
    I have a message for the Chrome development team.

    Sure took your sweet time, didn't you guys?
     
  5. Stridder44, Aug 28, 2014
    Last edited: Sep 1, 2014

    Stridder44
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 68040

    Stridder44

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2003
    Location:
    California
    #5
    Chrome added DirectWrite support for Chrome recently as well. The result is that text in Chrome looks amazing now. While DirectDraw is of course only a Windows thing, does anybody know if OS X had something similar that Chrome could utilize (or has already been utilizing)?
     
  6. pedromcm.pm
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2014
    Location:
    Porto, Portugal
    #6
    OS X renders things properly.
     
  7. lotuseater99
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2012
    #7
    Performance degradation

    I have always greatly preferred Chrome over Safari, but the 32-Bit version was overheating my MBP after I installed Mavericks. I switched to Safari for awhile because I couldn't stand the fan noise.

    When I noticed the Canary 64-Bit build of Chrome a few weeks ago, I jumped on it. It was great (no overheating/fan noise) up until build 39 a few days ago. Now it is just as bad as the 32-Bit version.
     
  8. kappaknight
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 68000

    kappaknight

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2009
    #8
    I honestly can't tell the difference between Canary and regular Chrome on my rMBP.
     
  9. simonmet
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2012
    Location:
    Sydney
    #9
    So they can track you in 64-bits now... Better than 32 I suppose if you're into that.
     
  10. mbrokerny
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    May 30, 2010
  11. ArtOfWarfare
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 604

    ArtOfWarfare

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2007
    #11
    Acknowledging the fact that they're only 6 years behind on this. Seriously - the migration from 32-bit to 64-bit predates Chrome's first release, why the hell did it take this long? Why wasn't it 64-bit out of the gate?
     
  12. arkmannj
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 65816

    arkmannj

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2003
    Location:
    UT
    #12
    that's my question also
     
  13. a0me
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 6502a

    a0me

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2006
    Location:
    Tokyo, Japan
    #13
    To be fair, text usually looks like crap on Windows.
     
  14. Traverse, Aug 28, 2014
    Last edited: Aug 29, 2014

    Traverse
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 603

    Traverse

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2013
    Location:
    Here
    #14
    Windows doesn't do a good job at font smoothing so text looked too jagged. However, when running Windows on a Retina MacBook Pro, Chrome's UI and all rendered content was pixelated due to terrible scaling. Chrome now incorporates Windows Direct Write allowing for a sharp UI and high quality content. I am amazed that FireFox incorporated this so long before the "most advanced browser".
     
  15. genovelle
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    May 8, 2008
    #15
    I wonder if it has the same server running in the background that my service tech showed me at work is on the widows version.
     
  16. isomorphic
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2010
    #16
    I installed some software the other day that sends all my keystrokes to servers in the cloud, and automatically updates itself in the background (at any time) without asking first.

    Oh, and other than Chrome I might also have some spyware on my system.

    /s
     
  17. Sonmi451
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2014
    Location:
    in my Tesla Model S
  18. thomaskc
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2010
    #18
    This should Apple's motto... it would fit perfectly! every year Apple announces and releases basic stuff that is "nice" to have, purely because Apple fans haven't had it the last 10 years while every other platform has... heck even dual screen in OSX is still totally iffy (yes also wonky in 10.10) compared to windows and linux.

    Anyway, 64bit chrome is good, late or not.
     
  19. groovyd
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 6502a

    groovyd

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2013
    Location:
    Atlanta
    #19
    blow the public beta yosemite out of the water on sunspider. chrome runs in all of 10 seconds while safari takes minutes. interesting is they both return very close results. something is def wrong with this preview build.

    ----------

    one big feature for me however is the double light tap on the magic mouse to zoom into a paragraph or photo or video under safari.

    Google seems to be using a quarter of the memory of safari as well rendering the same page.
     
  20. rrm74001
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors regular

    rrm74001

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2008
    #20
    Why did it take so long for the most popular web browser to do this? Especially one created by the king of the internet: Google.

    [​IMG]
     
  21. groovyd
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 6502a

    groovyd

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2013
    Location:
    Atlanta
    #21
    safari still scrolls much smoother even in the public beta which i imagine is doing all sorts of background data collection. text seems smoother too.
     
  22. Sonmi451
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2014
    Location:
    in my Tesla Model S
    #22
    Um what has Apple been late on? Besides bigger iPhone screen. I love how you criticize Apple so much but then you look at your url and it says macrumors.com. Do you have scars on your back from all the whipping?
     
  23. imageWIS
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2009
    Location:
    NYC
    #23
    You mean like the Macintosh, the Quicktake, the Newton, the iPod, the iPhone, the MacBook Air, and the iPhone? Yeah, Apple is ALWAYS behind... :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:
     
  24. gearaholic
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2012
    #24
  25. theBostonian
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2012
    #25
    Why don't you run Chromium instead? You can either compile it yourself so you know what you're getting or go the lazy route and use this: http://www.macupdate.com/app/mac/36244/chromium
     

Share This Page