I'm talking about WhatsApp.That's why I won't even install Allo.
And doesn't make my statement about iMessage less true.
I'm talking about WhatsApp.That's why I won't even install Allo.
And doesn't make my statement about iMessage less true.
But it's cross platform, big difference.I'm talking about WhatsApp.
And how is iMessage not? It uses SMS/MMS as a fallback. Could not get less proprietary. And no app to install, no signups, no sharing your data with Facebook.But it's cross platform, big difference.
I can't send an iMessage sticker to someone who uses Android. Or all features of iMessage including end to end encryption. Therefore it's not cross-platform.And how is iMessage not? It uses SMS/MMS as a fallback. Could not get less proprietary. And no app to install, no signups, no sharing your data with Facebook.
Yes you can. It gets sent as a gif. iMessage has a layer of features on top of open standards, making it infinitely less proprietary than a Facebook owned app that requires the people you talk to download, install and sign up before you can even initiate a conversation.I can't send an iMessage sticker to someone who uses Android. Or all features of iMessage including end to end encryption. Therefore it's not cross-platform.
Even if it is sent as a gif, it would be a MMS message and most carriers charge you for using MMS.Yes you can. It gets sent as a gif. iMessage has a layer of features on top of open standards, making it infinitely less proprietary than a Facebook owned app that requires the people you talk to download, install and sign up before you can even initiate a conversation.
Yes, nothing at this point beats SMS at this point as everyone who has a phone has it. But you can only send standard texts that's it. And if you are not on a plan, it's not free to send texts. At least with a 3rd party, you can use Wifi.You are not getting what I am saying here: WhatsApp and Messenger are far more proprietary than iMessage. And far less convenient since users have to download and install third party apps to even initiate a conversation since there is no fallback to SMS or MMS (which are free for most users anyway).
There are certainly more people with iPhones that have iMessage turned on (by default) than there are people willing to download and set up a third party messaging app.And while iMessage does have "most" of those features (with FaceTime), its features will only work if the recipient has iMessage turned on.
There are certainly more people with iPhones that have iMessage turned on (by default) than there are people willing to download and set up a third party messaging app.
You're always talking about SMS, but that's irrelevant in connection with iMessage because everyone with a mobile phone has it. And iMessage is still Apple only. Yes, in Apple-Candyland (US) many people have iPhones, but in almost every other country iPhones are a minority.You are not getting what I am saying here: WhatsApp and Messenger are far more proprietary than iMessage. And far less convenient since users have to download and install third party apps to even initiate a conversation since there is no fallback to SMS or MMS (which are free for most users anyway).
Funny, because I have quite a few green bubble peeps in my group chats, and we communicate just fine.I'm pretty sure that even though iPhones are dominant in the US (hard to believe that, but ok), they'll always be that person with an Android or a Windows Phone. You cannot use iMessage with him/her. Then what?
Don't say SMS because what if I want to add that person to the iMessage group chat? Impossible.
Unless it's a group chat set up by GroupMe, Google Allo or similar, that's impossible. SMS wasn't designed for group chats.Funny, because I have quite a few green bubble peeps in my group chats, and we communicate just fine.
Not sure why you think I'm from the US. But I'll concede that most developing countries and even some European countries outside of the cities are Android dominated. Still does not matter since iMessage is falling back to SMS and, third party apps doesn't.You're always talking about SMS, but that's irrelevant in connection with iMessage because everyone with a mobile phone has it. And iMessage is still Apple only. Yes, in Apple-Candyland (US) many people have iPhones, but in almost every other country iPhones are a minority.
That might be the case, but ever since you have been able to send an SMS to several numbers at once, group chats have been de fact possible. Just because a protocol was originally meant to be a one to one, doesn't mean that there aren't ways around that.Unless it's a group chat set up by GroupMe, Google Allo, that's impossible. SMS wasn't designed for group chats.
Not sure why you think I'm from the US. But I'll concede that most developing countries and even some European countries outside of the cities are Android dominated. Still does not matter since iMessage is falling back to SMS and, third party apps doesn't.
Your argument was that iMessage is proprietary. You still have not made a single argument for how it is more proprietary than your third party chat app of choice.
As for user base it is a three way tie between iMessage, WhatsApp and Messenger at roughly 1Bn active users per month right now. OBVIOUSLY this is geo and class dependent, but that's not the point. The point you made was that iMessage is somehow proprietary and by comparison, and of virtue of being cross platform, third party chat apps weren't.
[doublepost=1474643334][/doublepost]That might be the case, but ever since you have been able to send an SMS to several numbers at once, group chats have been de fact possible. Just because a protocol was originally meant to be a one to one, doesn't mean that there aren't ways around that.
Group SMS/MMS or iMessage chats are all possible, regardless of devices you are communicating with:
https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT202724
The number between active iOS users and active iMessage users would be negligible. That's the power of defaults.Also 1 billion active devices is not active iMessage users. No one in Apple said there are 1 billion active iMessage users.
Not really. Remember that iPhone is not the only Apple device that has access to iMessage. For example there are iPad only users who don't use iMessage at all, but count as an active iOS user. I know, I have grandparents who never use iMessage on their iPads.The number between active iOS users and active iMessage users would be negligible. That's the power of defaults.
Even if it is sent as a gif, it would be a MMS message and most carriers charge you for using MMS.
And stickers is ONE thing anyway, what about other iMessage features?
Don't know why we are arguing this anyway as I just figured it out that iMessage features are disabled when chatting to a non-iMessage device.
Also, regardless on what you say - still no end to end encryption unless both users have iMessage turned on.
This is why iMessage must be available on other devices if it ever wants to compete with Messenger and WhatsApp. Until then, it will always be behind.