Google Releases Chromecast App for iOS

Discussion in 'iOS Blog Discussion' started by MacRumors, Aug 27, 2013.

  1. macrumors bot

    MacRumors

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2001
    #1
    [​IMG]


    Google has released its official Chromecast app for iOS today, allowing Apple mobile devices to officially control the HDMI accessory. The app allows for functionality such as managing Chromecast settings for changing the name, password, and settings of the device, as well as allowing setup of the Chromecast through an iOS device. The app also allows users to stream content from iOS apps, including YouTube and Netflix.

    [​IMG]
    Originally announced and released in July, Chromecast allows for functionality similar to AirPlay and Apple TV, allowing users to mirror content from a tablet, smartphone, or computer. Following the launch of Chromecast, Apple lowered the price of its refurbished Apple TVs to $74, offering a $24 discount off of its intended $99 price. Additionally, a comparison chart between Chromecast, Apple TV, and media device Roku surfaced to examine the differences between all devices.

    Google's Chromecast app can be downloaded from the App Store for free. [Direct Link]

    Article Link: Google Releases Chromecast App for iOS
     
  2. musika, Aug 27, 2013
    Last edited: Aug 27, 2013

    macrumors 65816

    musika

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2010
    Location:
    New York
    #2
  3. macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2009
  4. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2005
    Location:
    Monterey,CA
    #4
    This statement is false. That's not how Chromecast works at all.
     
  5. macrumors regular

    Koulie

    Joined:
    May 19, 2013
    Location:
    Melbourne, Australia
    #5
    If only they incorporated Airplay - that would really end Apple TV. Nevertheless, still a highly valuable and cheap item!
     
  6. macrumors 68030

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2007
    Location:
    London, UK
    #6
  7. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2008
    #7
    I read the update--And the fact remains Google intentionally blocked the local content workaround at the moment.
     
  8. macrumors 68030

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2007
    Location:
    London, UK
    #8
    "Intentionally blocked" is a pretty different thing from "was indifferent about breaking something acting against the terms of what is clearly marked as an unfinished SDK."

    Anyway, this app - surely this is irrelevant to actually casting to a Chromecast? The app wouldn't be able to affect what YouTube or Netflix did inside their apps.

    It's just the settings app, yeah?
     
  9. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2010
    #9
    Chromecast isn't able to receive streamed data directly from any device, so AirPlay would be hard.

    Chromecast is actually running a simplified version of Chrome OS, i.e. a Google Chrome browser on a chip that you give commands to.

    For example, to play a YouTube clip, the app actually tells Chromecast to "Visit YouTube and play this clip at this address". No video is sent from your device! That's why it can do Netflix, YouTube, or mirror a Google Chrome tab (it simply visits the page for you), but why AirPlay would be hard and probably also suffer in quality since it'd need to stream AirPlay via some proxy website. It can show anything that Chrome can show easily, but everything else is hard or impossible. It'll probably never be able to mirror an iPad display.

    Chromecast has unofficial PC desktop mirroring support, but I assume this one uses some proxy method, so that your desktop (grabbed by the local Google Chrome) is sent somewhere on the web, and Chromecast retrieves it from there. If this method doesn't support audio, that would explain why this experimental feature indeed doesn't mirror audio along with the screen.
     
  10. macrumors 65816

    musika

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2010
    Location:
    New York
    #10
    Nope, whoops. I read that two days ago and just linked back to it without rereading.

    Thanks for letting me know!
     
  11. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2011
    Location:
    Dutch Mountains
    #11
    Just wondering....what can it do, what an ATV can't?
     
  12. macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2003
    #12

    You don't seem to know what the words "fact" or "intentionally" mean.

    If I released an unsupported iOS app that relied on an unlisted testing feature in OS X Mavericks that was removed or rewritten during the developer preview, you wouldn't be dogging Apple for anything, you'd be saying "well, what did they expect? it wasn't even an approved feature, and it wasn't made for that purpose!"

    This is the same thing, only the developer reverse-engineered Google's proprietary code to enable the work-around. That's not a reliable solution for anything. It's possible that all they had to do to "break" his code is to recompile the source a slightly different way, or standardize the name on a couple of functions, or merge a couple of code libraries that were redundant.

    We have no idea, but it is transitional, early code, and they said as much right from the start. Google isn't known for malicious coding. It isn't worth the investment of developer time, and it isn't worth the potential backlash. This is a company whose major products are all free.

    ----------

    Not quite right, there. When you cast a Chrome tab, it doesn't go and pull that content from the internet directly via the Chromecast. That wouldn't be possible on things like websites that require authentication. It is casting directly from your local device (laptop, for example), and sending that info (audio and video) to the Chromecast directly.

    I can Cast my work email, which won't even let me log in to two browser sessions at once using two different browsers or two windows of the same browser. It's legitimately like "screen sharing", and there is experimental support for screen sharing, as well. That isn't going out to the internet and coming back to the chromecast. It's staying on the local network.
     
  13. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2008
    #13
    Google inserted this code with the obvious purpose of blocking this workaround:
    Code:
    if("mirror_tab" != a) {
    return null;
    }
    This code prevents the ability to play media from external sources. Seems pretty clear cut, no?

    There's a lot more detail in the ArsTechnica post here.
     
  14. macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2009
    #14
    If Apple made the ATV App to allow Android control/use it, would that make help Apple in ATV sales?
    Or will it loose too many iOS sales?

    IMHO, ATV is a sales point, like the Kindle Fire. Its value comes from the media it sells, not the device itself.
    Apple should sell the ATV for $59, make an Android app to control it, and watch iTunes profits surge!
     
  15. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2013
  16. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2009
    #16
    Nice...now how about you release the promised Google Play All Access app?
     
  17. macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2013
    #17
    Exactly. Also, this app isn't needed to cast. The YouTube and Netflix apps should do it already if you're up to date. The article makes it sound like you need this app in order to cast. The app is simply for connecting to your Chromecast to set it up. Once you're up and running, you can delete the Chromecast app if you'd like.
     
  18. macrumors regular

    Exotic-Car Man

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2010
    Location:
    USA
  19. macrumors G3

    charlituna

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2008
    Location:
    Los Angeles, CA
    #19
    Access the google play movie store. That's it

    But that's also why it's cheaper. And for those that don't care about mirroring local content like games, home videos off an iPad etc, that might be fine
     
  20. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2011
    #20
    Yes, the Chromecast's main function is to just receive coimmands from a mobile device which tells it what to play. However, AFAIK it does also have mirror-like functionality built in as well, although it is currently rough around the edges and is not as good as AirPlay.
     
  21. macrumors G3

    charlituna

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2008
    Location:
    Los Angeles, CA
    #21
    I disagree. Keep it at $99 even bump it to say $129, spice up the specs with 802.11 AC, better graphics etc.

    As for the Android app, something tells me that many if not most android users are devoted google store users so iTunes profits wouldn't surge so much cause they would still be buying for their own. Making it all moot.
     
  22. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2013
    #22
    From what you said, after you stream the movie, you can power off your mobile device and it still casts the program from online content? Doesn't sound like it.
     
  23. macrumors 68000

    ghostface147

    Joined:
    May 28, 2008
    #23
    Other than playing with it when I first got it off a contest on androidcentral, it has only been used for a live fantasy football draft. I only would care for it more if I could stream local content.
     
  24. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2006
    #24
  25. macrumors regular

    Exotic-Car Man

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2010
    Location:
    USA
    #25
    Yeah, MKBHD is awesome. He's a bit of a fandroid (although he uses a Hackintosh as his main computer), but he honestly has some of the best tech reviews and videos on the 'net.
     

Share This Page