Originally posted by QCassidy352
to all the people saying that PCs are good as long as you know what you're doing: well, that's fine for pros who do know what they're doing. But consider how many people don't know what they're doing. The funny thing is that PCs are really more appropriate for those with the expertise not to f*ck them up, but they are most used by the ignorant masses who are prone to "sloppy system management."
I think Macs are better because most users want a computer where they don't have to worry about system management.
Exactly right. When I find a piece of shareware that has a function I'd like, I don't have to worry, or see if there's a better solution that won't screw my system up. I install it and if it works, good, keep it. Oh, and mac's can use file sharing programs, and don't get screwed up systems (or spyware ) not that I support piracy - I don't, I'm just saying in terms of freedom from crap, Mac users have it much better off.
All of the Windows people here have a somewhat good point - that as long as you are careful with what you install and know not to use certain things, windows won't crash too often. I have a better point - on macs, you can install and use whatever the hell you want, and the computer will still start up.
Well, except for one time in System 8.6 when I installed so many kaleidoscope themes my computer ran out of memory starting up... but that's 8.6 and overdose on themes. As far as I know, if you wanted to install a lot of themes for Mac OS X (with an imaginary version of Kaleidoscope), it would use Virtual Memory and run quite slowly. Not crash, or give "general protection faults".