History repeated as Apple slams chip provider

Discussion in 'MacBytes.com News Discussion' started by MacBytes, Jul 15, 2004.

  1. macrumors bot

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2003
  2. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    May 2, 2002
    Location:
    Arizona
    #2
    Way off base

    Apple is not "slamming" IBM. Apple is simply stating that IBM, like all other chip manufacturers, experienced many more problems when moving to a 90nm process for CPUs. IBM has the capacity, the drive and the willingness to build this chips at the volume Apple needs/wants.

    Contrast this to Motorola who's delays were not industry wide, who's drive to update the chips was nearly non-existent. The problem with Motorola was that Apple was asking them to be a leading edge manufacturer of general purpose CPUs when MOT was moving toward low power integrated CPUs for consumer electronics.

    Motorola didn't want to keep pushing clock speed, power draw and heat generation; these things aren't necessary or desirable in cell phones, digital cameras, microwave ovens, etc.

    IBM is a major computer manufacturer, they also want to be a world class CPU fabrication mill, hence the $3B investment in the Fishkill plant. Their delays are simply a matter of physics, not of politics.

    There is almost no similarity between the two production issues except for Apple being the computer company affected by the shortage.
     
  3. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2003
    Location:
    USA (often) and Adelaide, OZ
    #3
    Absolutely correct. These headlines are getting worse and worse!
     
  4. macrumors 65816

    autrefois

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2003
    Location:
    Somewhere in the USA
    #4
    I'm NOT saying this is the reason for the problems, but I can't imagine IBM is too upset by all this.

    When IBM couldn't hit 3.0 GHz as planned, they probably just watched the 1984 Super Bowl ad a few times, happy to be largely in control of Apple's destiny.

    Perhaps they e-mailed Steve Jobs. "Sorry, Apple. Seriously."

    In any case, I hope for Apple's sake that IBM is the first in the industry to really get past the current 90nm problems soon.
     
  5. NAG
    macrumors 68030

    NAG

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2003
    Location:
    /usr/local/apps/nag
    #5
    Yeah, the Register tends to start flame wars. Although, they are a good place for news, sometimes.
     
  6. sjk
    macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    May 2, 2003
    Location:
    Eugene
    #6
    Yeah, we're bombed with jadedly opinionated, emotionally over-stimulating media announcements and reactions.
     
  7. macrumors 68040

    shamino

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2004
    Location:
    Purcellville, VA
    #7
    Athloons?

    Has anyone heard this term used at all before this article? :confused: :confused: :confused:

    I just did a Google search on "athloon" and found a very small number of hits - all misspellings of "athlon". None of them referring to people that like to use AMD's chips.
     
  8. macrumors G3

    iMeowbot

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2003
    #8
    (Athloons)
    That's the Register's schtick. The wild headlines and silly nicknames are supposed to be a parody of the tabloids. Sometimes they seem to forget it's a gag.
     
  9. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2004
    #9
    Hmm if their mission is to trick people into thinking they are just yet another bad tabloid on the net they had me for the past few years...
     

Share This Page