How legible is this logotype?

Discussion in 'Design and Graphics' started by destere, May 29, 2009.

  1. destere
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2008
    #1
    Basically, what I want you to do is look at the logotype and type what you think it says. If you've got any other comments on how to improve it (if you can see faults).

    Thanks
     
  2. arkitect
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 601

    arkitect

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2005
    Location:
    Bath
    #3
    beamish…

    although it "reads" as beomish to me.

    The a needs a bit of work, perhaps.
     
  3. Aperture
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 68000

    Aperture

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2006
    Location:
    PA
    #4
    Yeah, it definitely reads as beomish. I would make the 'a' more obvious.
     
  4. LeviG
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2006
    Location:
    Norfolk, UK
    #5
    yeah I read beamish too but the a does need a bit of work, maybe try using the older style a (like the one typed on here using verdana) and see if that works
     
  5. arjen92
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 65816

    arjen92

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2008
    Location:
    Below sea level
  6. LERsince1991
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2008
    Location:
    UK
  7. Designer Dale
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 68040

    Designer Dale

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2009
    Location:
    Folding space
    #8
    Everyone here is visually oriented by nature, so we might see it differently than others. Print it out and show it to folks on the street. I got it quickly, and I'm an old guy...

    Dale
     
  8. needlnerdz
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors regular

    needlnerdz

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2006
    Location:
    switzerland
    #9
    beamish at first glance... possibility of beomish at second..

    - maybe thickening the stem between the a + m would help define the a?
     
  9. Kwill
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 68000

    Kwill

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2003
    #10
    hsimaed. .Dyslectic I am ;)

    An "a" instead of an "a" might help.
     
  10. thunderweb
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 6502

    thunderweb

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2008
    Location:
    Bend OR
    #11
    I get beomish at first but it wouldn't hurt to make the o more legible.
     
  11. MOFS
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 65816

    MOFS

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2003
    Location:
    Durham, UK
    #12
    Is it regarding the Beamish museum? if so, with this in context it's clear what it's about. Even without that info, it still look looks like Beamish to me.;)
     
  12. destere
    Expand Collapse
    thread starter macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2008
    #13
    It is Beamish, but has nothing to do with the museum.


    The more I look at it, the more I see the 'o'. I will have a go at a traditional 'a', but have also been considering using the same 'a' but put a little flick at the bottom. I haven't had a go at it yet as the programme has packed up, but thanks for the comments!
     
  13. destere
    Expand Collapse
    thread starter macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2008
    #14
    Improvement?

    It's only a rough version and it a little bit ropey, it's just done to see if it looks right.
    I've just added a bit of a flick off the a, but is it clear enough?

    To see it properly, click on it to view it.
     
  14. LERsince1991
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2008
    Location:
    UK
  15. THX1139
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 68000

    THX1139

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2006
    #16
    Sorry, but if you have to ask, then the logotype has failed unless you are deliberately trying to under-code it. Not sure why you would want to do that with a logotype! Anyway, my advice is that you need to go back to your thumbnails and try again.
     
  16. DoFoT9
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors P6

    DoFoT9

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2007
    Location:
    Singapore
    #17
    impressive!! much better then the original, needs colour though :p

    no, not true at all. designers of logos/sites/anything often become mis-guided with assessing their own work. thats why its good to ask others :)
     
  17. TenPoundMonkey
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors member

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2007
    Location:
    VA
    #18
    True- sometimes we get too close to something or stare at it too long to be objective.
     

Share This Page