How Microsoft Blew It With Windows Mobile

Discussion in 'MacBytes.com News Discussion' started by MacBytes, Nov 17, 2009.

  1. macrumors bot

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2003
    #1
  2. macrumors 601

    DMann

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2002
    Location:
    10023
    #2
    With Windows Mobile’s market share plummeting to 7.9 percent, while Apple’s global mobile market share grew to 17.1 percent, one can only wonder what Steve Ballmer meant when he said:

    "... There’s no chance that the iPhone is going to get any significant market share. No chance."

    [​IMG]
    The Prophet of the 21st Century
     
  3. macrumors 68000

    SPUY767

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2003
    Location:
    GA
    #3
    MS blew it by assuming that desktop ubiquity would lead to mobile ubiquity. MS assumed that users would just use windows mobile because they used it on the desktop. Microsoft is often a corporation devoid of true innovation. Most microsoft products that aren't one-offs have been designed by committee snoozefests. Apple came to market with innovation at the exact moment that the consumer wanted it. Everyone else was suddenly 2 or more years behind and playing catch up.
     
  4. macrumors 68020

    jayducharme

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2006
    Location:
    The thick of it
    #4
    A related article about Android points out many of the same problems:

    And I love this quote:

    Really? So how else are they going to manage their "digital lives" on a PC? With Linux, perhaps?

    Apple may tightly control their products, but the aim is to create a flawless user experience. That's infinitely more difficult when there's no control over the hardware.
     
  5. macrumors 68000

    BongoBanger

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2008
    #5
    Probably that Apple would get 2-3% of the global cellphone market, not smartphones, which is actually what he said. Mind you, it's the most profitable 2-3%.

    He's still spot on though and this is apparent if you actually read the whole quote.
     
  6. macrumors 68020

    Liquorpuki

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2009
    Location:
    City of Angels
    #6
    "There's no chance that the iPhone is going to get any significant market share. No chance," said Ballmer. "It's a $500 subsidized item. They may make a lot of money. But if you actually take a look at the 1.3 billion phones that get sold, I'd prefer to have our software in 60% or 70% or 80% of them, than I would to have 2% or 3%, which is what Apple might get."

    You can't really tell which market he's referring to at all. But as far as phones are concerned, Windows Mobile is ONLY installed in smartphones, so when he compares Apple's 2-3% to Microsoft's 60-80%, it makes sense to think he's talking about the smartphone market
     
  7. macrumors G5

    jav6454

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2007
    Location:
    1 Geostationary Tower Plaza
    #7
    Microsoft blew it long ago.... not just now...
     
  8. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    May 5, 2008
    #8
    Probably the key phrase is "significant market share." I don't think anyone could claim that Apple doesn't have "significant market share." The number compared to the overall handset market is small, but the impact that the iPhone has had on the market is certainly "significant."
     
  9. macrumors 68000

    BongoBanger

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2008
    #9
    "But if you actually take a look at the 1.3 billion phones that get sold."

    Actually you can as that number refers to the overall cellphone market. Of course he's still delusional about WinMo but he's not actually wrong about the iPhone's market share.
     
  10. macrumors 68020

    Liquorpuki

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2009
    Location:
    City of Angels
    #10
    Then he's not only delusional but he's confused too. Jobs predicted the iPhone would capture 1% global marketshare. I don't get why Ballmer, in his hatred for the iPhone, would triple that number.
     
  11. macrumors 601

    DMann

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2002
    Location:
    10023
    #11
    Are you, then, suggesting that the attainment of 2-3% of global market share, within a two year period, is not significant?

    Why don't we, then, take a closer look at Worldwide Smartphone Sales, from 2007-2008:

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    Surely, the Smartphone Market is one which MS has a significant interest in. Do you feel that iPhone's 8.2% sales in 2008 vs. WinMo's 11.8% ought to be dismissed as insignificant as well?

    It would be of no surprise if Steve Ballmer were to further contend that the 66.61% of iPhone's total Smartphone share on the Web is merely a "rounding error," "a blip on the radar screen,'" especially when compared to WinMo's 6.91%.

    [​IMG]

    I wonder what his take on this would be?

    You are quite right, this is a prime example of typical "Ballmer Speak," mixing market sectors to serve his purpose.

    This is the whole point. Within the span of two years, the momentum of iPhone sales has been quite significant.

    Yes, Ballmer's delusions are consistently self-serving - this is one thing he tends to do quite well.
     

Share This Page