How Will iPhone Apps Be Implemented?

Discussion in 'iOS Blog Discussion' started by MacRumors, Oct 19, 2007.

  1. macrumors bot

    MacRumors

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2001
    #1
    [​IMG]

    John Gruber explores what Steve Jobs could have meant with regard to his announcement earlier this week that Apple would be releasing a development kit for the iPhone:
    Specific comparisons are made to the Danger Hiptop/Sidekick development model which, 9to5mac had suggested Apple was exploring.

    Article Link
     
  2. macrumors 68020

    megfilmworks

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2007
    Location:
    Sherman Oaks
    #2
    This is a very interesting article with some very informed and educated guessing.
     
  3. macrumors 6502a

    boss1

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2007
    #3
    Very good read. Interesting insight and references to experienced developers and their take on the iPhone.


    I would have to disagree with Steven Frank on the point of no free apps however. There are software companies that would probably be very willing to pay the cost to play, and still release freebie apps if Apple allows it. All of this in an effort to attract attention to the software developers desktop versions or other apps on their website that cost money.

    This type of "get a popular freebie app and make sure to check out the full version or other apps on our website" marketing is not uncommon.
     
  4. macrumors 65816

    DeaconGraves

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2007
    Location:
    Dallas, TX
    #4
    Very good point. Perhaps even syncing between the iphone app and a full version Mac app could be possible?
     
  5. macrumors 603

    Markleshark

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2006
    Location:
    Carlisle, Up Norf!
    #5
    I really hope its the iTunes download route. That would just be perfect and hassle free.

    I don't even mind that everything might be a few pounds.
     
  6. macrumors 6502a

    boss1

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2007
    #6
    yah, I would be willing to bet a company like http://www.marketcircle.com/ that creates Daylight will probably be one of the ones to take on the task of creating such functionality.
     
  7. macrumors 604

    gkarris

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2004
    Location:
    "No escape from Reality..."
    #7
    With money. :eek: The sell, you buy. Through the iTunes store like the iPod games.
     
  8. JNB
    macrumors 604

    JNB

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2004
    Location:
    In a Hell predominately of my own making
    #8
    As much as many like to tout the Palm model of 3rd-party apps (tens of thousands available through many sources, many free- or shareware), it's important to remember the repetitive, poorly executed, or just utterly craptastic nature of a huge portion of those. I'll take quality of build, utility value, and trust over volume any day.

    So while I believe that an iTunes delivery would be the most straightforward for the end user, I would still like to see a somewhat greater degree of openness than that; I just don't see Apple offering as wide a variety (in a timely manner) of apps as could be delivered otherwise.

    An alternative (or additional) means would be similar to the "Mac OS X Software" jump under the :apple: menu. Links to publishers external to Apple's direct management and control--while still being vetted by Apple--would provide the greatest flexibility to all.
     
  9. macrumors 603

    Stella

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2003
    Location:
    Canada
    #9
    How about upgrades to apps you already own?

    iTunes would be the easiest way, but it would be also good if iPhone allowed direct download and install from web sites like other phones currently do.

    iPhone apps, if released as free ( opensource or otherwise ) should remain as free.
     
  10. macrumors 6502

    donlphi

    Joined:
    May 25, 2006
    Location:
    Seattle (M$ Country)
    #10
    Slingplayer inevitable?

    I think we may have finally found a route for Slingplayer on the iPhone. For those of you that don't have it, you won't understand the beauty of it, but for those of you that do, this app on the iPhone will change everything.

    I don't think it will hurt iTunes movie sales either since you can't connect to a network on a plane or get video access in a non-wi-fi or non-EDGE area. You still need to load the phone up with movies and music when you are on the go.

    Anyway... I expect to see some really great apps being available in March or April of 2008. Very exciting stuff.
     
  11. macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2006
    #11
    Widgets

    I would like the whole process to be similar to downloading widgets. Go to either the Apple site or a site like Dashboard Widget showcase, download an app while the iPhone is connected and it automatically installs. Either that or Apple should get in touch with the Apptapp guys and buy their methods. I can't see it being any easier than what they have come up with.
     
  12. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2005
    #12
    Problem is, Dashboard widgets are just XML-based applets, which are a lot less prone to causing security or stability issues than compiled binaries. Since the iPhone SDK will (presumably) focus on the latter, it's far more likely that we'll have to get our apps via iTunes after Apple certifies them.

    Personally, I don't understand why the iPhone doesn't have some sort of Dashboard Lite. At the very least I wouldn't have to connect to the web to use a tip calculator! :p
     
  13. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2002
    #13
    Comment addressed in original article.
     
  14. macrumors 68020

    megfilmworks

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2007
    Location:
    Sherman Oaks
    #14
    Hopefully this SDK won't encourage Palm like apps, too many and too lame.
    I would be happy with a few solid apps, like iWork, Word, Filemaker, etc .
    I don't need a poorman's GPS or garage door opener! ;)
     
  15. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2005
    #15
    Oh, there were two links in that post. 1/2 RTFA, sorry. :)
     
  16. 123
    macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2002
    #16
    What's wrong with having a garage door opener on the iphone?
     
  17. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2005
    #17
    CPU Hogging apps

    One rationale for an SDK and sandbox not mentioned by Gruber is the possibility of run-away processes.

    I'll plead ignorance on how OSes, including Tiger and now Leopard, control access to CPU resources. Simple multi-task switching algorithms cannot support such needs when (near) real-time is required for some functions.

    Certainly, with concern for battery life and the critical timing importance to the mobile phone functionality and GUI, the OS must pay special attention to ensuring that processes (applications) do not demand too much CPU and memory resources at the expense of Apple's native iPhone functions and applications.

    Perhaps some can enlighten me on these issues.
     
  18. macrumors 68020

    megfilmworks

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2007
    Location:
    Sherman Oaks
    #18
    Actually, maybe you're right. Adding to my wish list!
     
  19. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2005
    #19
    I totally don't understand those who are saying they're rather restrict development on the phone and have fewer apps with higher quality.

    Just look at OS X. There are tons of apps out there, many of them crap but many of them very useful and many of them written by small software shops or individual authors.

    As a shareware author who writes software for Win32, OS X and Linux, I can develop a new app that I have a great idea for and bring it to market with no real barriers to entry. I can use any number of fulfillment processors (I use ShareIt) to collect payment and issue license codes. Thank the good Lord I never have to deal with Microsoft, Apple, or anybody else. I don't think my applications are crap, but if you think they are crap, you don't have to spend an extra 2 seconds on our web site. You can just go somewhere else.

    Let me tell you how Apple can kill innovation. First, they'll charge a fortune for a developer kit for the iPhone. Next, they may force the app to go through some sort of certification process. This might also cost money. Then, they'll demand that they be the sole source for obtaining this app. They will sell it for $10 and they will give the software developer a couple of bucks for their effort in doing... well, basically nothing except spending thousands of hours of their time developing the app. The only guys who will develop under this model are a few big companies, and the apps will be mass market crap that they know they can sell a million copies of. Niche apps won't make the cut because at a couple bucks a pop, a person can't make a profit.

    No thanks. This is ridiculous. Is this a Soviet era phone? Only the proletariat or authorized members of the mafia can develop applications? If this is their model, forget it.
     
  20. macrumors 6502a

    tbobmccoy

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2007
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    #20
    Not that i disagree with you, but it's the bourgeoisie I think you're thinking about here.

    The history degree in my screamed out to correct this. The Proletariat are the good people of the working class taking their free time to develop hacks and apps for our phones ;)
     
  21. macrumors 68020

    megfilmworks

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2007
    Location:
    Sherman Oaks
    #21
    I think freedom is the key. Not freedom to develop apps for Apple, but Apple's ability to be free to choose how they would like to do business with their products.
     
  22. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    May 9, 2007
    Location:
    Albuquerque
    #22
    How Will iPhone Apps Be Implemented?

    Two things come to mind: itunes & money
     
  23. macrumors 68020

    megfilmworks

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2007
    Location:
    Sherman Oaks
    #23
    LOL, I think you are right!
     
  24. macrumors 603

    Stella

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2003
    Location:
    Canada
    #24
    Then use your self control and not install any apps you don't like! Just like watching the TV - if you dislike a programme then change to a different channel.

    Free will is a wonderful thing:)
     

Share This Page