I think I know why the Air 11 sports a 16:9 screen ratio.

Discussion in 'MacBook Air' started by wdaleherring, Jul 21, 2011.

  1. macrumors member

    #1
    I think if it would have been a 16:10 screen then the size of the machine would have fallen a bit too short to support a full keyboard.

    Thoughts?
     
  2. macrumors 601

    alust2013

    #2
    I think that's the most likely reason.
     
  3. macrumors 68040

    #3
    That's a theory I heard recently. Either way, I'm glad it is because it's why I went with the 11.
     
  4. macrumors 68030

    WardC

    #4
    If it was a 16:10 screen with a full keyboard, it would be a 12" MBA. By making a 16:9 they can reduce the size and call it an 11", it is really 11.6"
     
  5. macrumors 68000

    Over Achiever

    #5
    11.6" 16x9 LCDs are a fairly common LCD size, even before the MBA was released. It's probably also a manufacturing/parts supply decision as well.
     
  6. macrumors regular

    #6
    I agree, it's to differentiate it from the "13" which is actually only 1.7 inches bigger. I'm amazed anybody ever gets anything done on such a short screen.
     
  7. macrumors newbie

    #7
    I LOVE LOVE LOVE the 11 inch. I've written pages and pages of things on it. Prefer it over the 13 inch. The 13 inch, to me, is just another macbook or macbook pro. The 11 inch...that's the WOW factor one...that's the one that truly feels like air. A++++++!
     
  8. macrumors 65816

    torbjoern

    #8
    It was the pixel resolution (in addition to storage) which steered me away from the 11-inch in the first place - it has only 768 pixels in vertical direction, whereas in comparison, 800 pixels (of the MB and MBP 13) was already a bit too little for me. I'd have to keep the dock on the side of the screen then, in the very least.

    It has to be mentioned, though, that I'm using the Air as my primary computer. I suppose most of the 11-inch-users already have an iMac, Mac mini or Mac Pro as well.
     
  9. macrumors 68020

    #9
    You are easily amazed.
     
  10. CHSeifert, Jul 22, 2011
    Last edited by a moderator: Jul 24, 2011

    macrumors 6502

    CHSeifert

    #10
    I contemplate the MBA 11 Ultimate - and have a maxed out iMac 27 SSD with extra (soon to be Thunderbolt) ACD 27 LED.

    Only battery life steers me away from the 11 and towards the 13. I need 4 hours a day, no less than that using Pages, Numbers, iPhoto and Safari/Chrome.
     
  11. macrumors 65816

    #11
    I don't understand. If it is 16:10, wouldn't it have 10% more height? So how can that be too short for a full keyboard? It is adding more space if anything.
     
  12. macrumors 65816

    torbjoern

    #12
    I think he meant changing to 16:10 while keeping the height constant. That would reduce the width and the space altogether.
     
  13. macrumors member

    #13
    The 12" iBook G4 (what i upgraded from) has a slightly narrower footprint than the 11" MBA, even though the keyboards are the same width. The keyboard of the 12" goes almost all the way to the edge, whilst that of the 11" has like half an inch of 'keyboard bezel'. Maybe the MBA is thin enough that things like USB ports can't fit underneath the keys, requiring the extra case width.
     
  14. macrumors member

    #14
    (Per Display Wars)

    [​IMG]




     

Share This Page