Sorry for the long post. Looking for opinions... I have a 867 Quicksilver (my fourth Mac) and a 22" Cinema Display I bought second hand a few years ago, expecting to eventually update the tower. I dearly love the display. Love the concept of the mini...thought it would be a great replacement, and cheap enough it could (almost) be considered throwaway. We use our Mac for games in a common room so I want reasonable graphics performance. upgrades to the mini are much more expensive than the iMac. (going to 2GB/160GB-$450 on mini, 2GB/500GB-$375 on imac). End result: $1348 for 1.83GHz/2GB/160GB mini (and I'll need to buy a separate external drive-couple hundred more) versus $2009 for a 2.16GHz/2GB/500GB 20-inch iMac versus $2559 for a 2.16GHz/2GB/500GB 24-inch iMac. So my choices are: Buy an iMac, put the tower and the cinema display in the back room (gasp, that beautiful cinema display in a back room seems like such a waste, but I would have another computer for when we are fighting over who gets to use it) or, buy a mini, sell the tower (worried that I won't be happy with game performance-get around 15-20 fps right now on WoW outside. Definitely want better). Related questions: 1. Are iMac owners happy with how their computers look say, compared to a cinema display? 2. Would I be satisfied buying a 20-inch iMac for our main computer since we've been used to a 22-inch cinema? Thank you for your insights.