Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
iOS 5 Opens Door to True 1080p Apple TV
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
I plan on getting the AT3 mainly because I have been considering getting a second AT2 for my daughter's room. Now she can take it and I can put the new one in the living room where the big TV is.
who's serious about 1080p!
I don't consider consumers serious about 1080p until they actually own a 70"+ screen on which to display it.
I don't consider consumers serious about 1080p until they actually own a 70"+ screen on which to display it.
So the VXD375 video decoder in the AppleTV 2 physically can't do 1080P? Surely this isn't the case?
I've got a $70 Chinese media player that plays >10gig 1080p Bluray rips beautifully, with DTS HD/DD True HD. The Apple TV2 is rather crippled if this is the case.
I've got a $70 Chinese media player that plays >10gig 1080p Bluray rips beautifully, with DTS HD/DD True HD. The Apple TV2 is rather crippled if this is the case.
Nobody should consider anyone serious who only considers screen size and not viewing distance
HobeSoundDarryl
macrumors G5
Afraid not. A lot of the "zone 2" functionality on receivers requires analog (not digital) out.
HobeSoundDarryl
macrumors G5
It's so funny how we Mac fans post so much about the hunger for more, more, more (better CPUs, latest graphics cards, retina displays, more storage in iDevices, more Flash in iDevices, higher resolution cameras, etc), except for this ONE thing where we somehow have convinced ourselves that less than the max standard is THE way to go.
4 times the number of pixels on a 9-inch screen makes sense, but just 2 times the number of pixels on a 40, 50, 60, 70+ inch screen doesn't. So funny.
It is not "marginal" differences for everyone; I find it very easy to see the difference in my own situation. That's not saying that 720p looks bad. It's more along the lines of "why not?". If YOU are satisfied with Apple 720p standard, GREAT! You could still enjoy it to the fullest on 1080p hardware too, as better hardware can always play lesser-demanding software. It just doesn't work the other way.
Just about every other set top
TV-like box has long been 1080p. If Jobs wants to turn the page (vs. BD), he needs to deliver something that competes in the most fundamental benefit of BD: picture quality. When it comes to the fundamentals of computing technology, "good enough" is rarely what people want... they want "great". Except, for some reason, with this thing.
Last edited:
Nobody should consider anyone serious who only considers screen size and not viewing distance
Exactly. On a 70" screen, the pixel density of 1080p is only 31.47 ppi. You would need to sit further away from the set than you would say, a 56" set with the same resolution (39.34 ppi) for it to look proper. That is to say, one can certainly appreciate the full glory of 1080p on a sub-70" set, even while sitting closer to the screen.
Personally, I'll welcome the additional horsepower (and potentially storage) the 3rd gen
TV will have. That said, I'll likely keep to high bit rate 720p files over 1080p. A 10-12GB 720p file gives me 85-90% of the picture quality (to my eyes) and 100% of the audio quality at 1/5 the file size. Storage is cheap, but not cheap enough to store 50+ TV series and 300+ movies at full resolution.
This makes complete sense because..........................
I just bought an ATV two weeks ago...
Awesome...
I just bought an ATV two weeks ago...
Awesome...
The aTV2 can play 1080p videos (albeit, outputted at 720p), so you can keep one copy of the movie in 1080p and the kids aTV2 and your rumored-aTV3 can play the same file.
note - 1080p videos on the aTV2 may result in some frame drops, depending on the encoded bit rate and other factors. I'm guessing that when aTV3 shows up, the Handbrake guys will come up with a great pre-set that encodes in 1080p at the appropriate bit-rate to look great on both the aTV2 and the aTV3.
Bout' darn time.
I thought it hilarious that all the ATV acolytes defended 720p tooth and nail...while citing the only 2 advantages of 720p>1080P, being file size and processing requirements(which is almost moot). Watch them do a 180 and talk about how wonderful 1080p is now. Yeesh
I thought it hilarious that all the ATV acolytes defended 720p tooth and nail...while citing the only 2 advantages of 720p>1080P, being file size and processing requirements(which is almost moot). Watch them do a 180 and talk about how wonderful 1080p is now. Yeesh
1080p is a great thing, i love streaming 1080, i just don't see myself buying it...ever - especially in digital format, it's just way too much to store comparatively.
I get bluray's via netflix, and i love watching a good film on bluray. But i'm not convinced that renting a movie from iTunes in 1080, will compare to the sound and picture that bluray offers, and it's definitely not worth another $99 because netflix steaming will still be 720. And I never rent from iTunes, wasted money when i can get unlimited bluray's a month from netflix as part of the $12 subscription.
How many people have a TV big enough to see the difference between 720p and 1080p? It's really just a marketing bullet point if you don't have a 55+ inch TV, so I'm not I expect a big bump in AppleTV sales when this feature is added in the fall.
That's correct, some receivers can't handle digital on zone 2. For those you need to get a 20 dollar TOSLINK to analog converter from monoprice.com and you're good to go.
HobeSoundDarryl
macrumors G5
Or Apple could just build it in as the same board is the basis for other iDevices that include analog audio out. It would cost Apple a tiny fraction of $20 to include it and it would be a nice value add.
It makes a fairly noticeable difference if your set is native 1080p. It does no good at all if your set is native 720p.
its 2011 people, 720p has been around for 10+ years, like all things, its time to upgrade, and YES there is an actual difference.
I have the same issue. I have zone two audio going up through the ceiling, to the opposite wall and out to the back yard where I have quality rock speakers from TIC. I also have a video line that goes out there. I can play music or carry my projector out (usually I have sports on the side of the house).
The video is not HD btw but from 25ft, the projected video is really good. No complaints. If I want HD I go inside.
Anyway, if I stream music to zone 2 I use the airport express. The appletv can't do this. For video I can't use the appletv either because I'd have to get an HD projector and run an HDMI cable out. I usually send Directv signal or if I want video from itunes I use my older macbook with a video adapter. That adapter will not work with newer laptops though.
The ideal situation would be to have an appletv that could simultaneously put out digital and analog audio and video like the directv unit does.
Another option for the future would be to use the laptop outside plugged into the projector directly and be able to send the audio wirelessly to the airport express. Right now it is not possible because while Apple allows you to watch video on an iOS device and send audio through airplay, you cannot do this from itunes. It is insane. Perhaps this will change in Lion?
I use an older G-speed wifi express. It works fine for streaming music and you can find them for less.
^^
Yes we will all get to 1080p eventually. But seriously having grown up with a CRT TV, 720p is great. I have a 1080p TV but only 480p Directv and 720p Appletv. I do have a PS3 for bluray but it hardly gets used. I refuse to pay extra for HD from a TV carrier. I do not watch enough network TV to justify it. I watch sports mostly but I am more interested in the game itself than if I can see the individual ice crystals kicked up by the hockey skates.
The thing is that 720p allows for a larger TV in a smaller room than would be possible with standard def. The same is true for 1080p but really the size of the TV in my room is just fine with the given distance with 720p. Even the 480 looks fine for broadcast TV. 480 is HD too compared to older broadcast TV.
Last edited:
HobeSoundDarryl
macrumors G5
The first generation
TV does this. It's one of 3 features I wish would be resurrected in gen 3.