iPad Implicated in Pediatric Rashes Diagnosed as Nickel Allergies [Updated]

Discussion in 'MacRumors.com News Discussion' started by MacRumors, Jul 14, 2014.

  1. macrumors bot

    MacRumors

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2001
    #1
    [​IMG]


    Apple's iPad may be the cause of unexplained allergic rashes in children, reports The Washington Post, which cites a case study of an 11-year-old boy that was published in Pediatrics medical journal.

    [​IMG]
    The Pediatrics article focuses on an 11-year-old boy who may be allergic to the nickel used in the casing of the tablet device. Following the increasing use of an iPad, the patient developed a rash that would not respond to conventional treatment.
    Doctors advised the boy to use a Smart Case that covers the entire outer surface of the tablet. Similar to other reports of electronic device-induced rashes, the boy's skin condition improved significantly when he started using a case that prevented direct contact with the device.

    As noted by the Associated Press, nickel allergies in children appear to be on the rise, with 25 percent of those receiving skin tests testing positive for nickel allergies, up from 17 percent a decade ago.

    This iPad isn't the only device implicated in skin rashes. Earlier this year, Fitbit voluntarily recalled its Force fitness tracker after a growing number of users developed contact dermatitis from wearing the band. The rash was originally attributed to nickel in the charging port of the band, but that metal may not be involved as many users covered the nickel-containing port with tape and continued to experience a rash.

    Update 3:00 PM PT: Apple has provided a statement to The Wall Street Journal noting that its products meet strict standards set for jewelry by the U.S. Consumer Safety Product Commission.
    Article Link: iPad Implicated in Pediatric Rashes Diagnosed as Nickel Allergies [Updated]
     
  2. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    May 22, 2011
    #2
    I clearly told Tommy not to put nickel on those ipads...the guy just doesnt listen....its all about how thick the 2014 pipeline is!
     
  3. macrumors 68030

    Amazing Iceman

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2008
    Location:
    Florida, U.S.A.
    #3
    Interesting, while I have never seen anyone using an iPad without a case or similar type of protection.
     
  4. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2013
    Location:
    Orem, UT
  5. macrumors regular

    Vol7ron

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2009
    Location:
    Derry, NH
    #5
    I'm sensing a class action lawsuit springing up in the near future...
     
  6. macrumors 6502a

    AppleWarMachine

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2011
    Location:
    Michigan, US
  7. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2014
    #7
    NEWS! - Boy with allergy reacts to something that contains the thing he's allergic to.

    SHOCKER!
     
  8. macrumors 68030

    Popeye206

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2007
    Location:
    NE PA USA
  9. macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2010
    Location:
    London
    #9
    you clearly don't get out much then. No one I know uses a iPad case... iPhone cases... lots.
     
  10. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2014
    #10
    Samsung's next advert praising the allergy free high quality plastics used in their devices. Portrays Apple users as having terrible skin conditions.
     
  11. macrumors 6502a

    DesertEagle

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2012
    Location:
    /home @ 127.0.0.1
    #11
    Nickel allergy is common. Makes me wonder why Apple use nickel in the alloy of a tablet casing when it's supposed to be held in the hand.
     
  12. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2012
    Location:
    Columbia, MD
    #12
    This is stupid as stated. And who lets an 11 year old use an ipad without a case? I wouldn't let my wife use an ipad without a case.
     
  13. macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2009
  14. macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2011
    Location:
    Ohio
    #14
    How do we know he had such an allergy? The thing with allergies is they pop up unexpectedly, he could have been fine one day and the next, the rashes started breaking out.
     
  15. macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2008
  16. TheIguana, Jul 14, 2014
    Last edited: Jul 14, 2014

    macrumors 6502a

    TheIguana

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2004
    Location:
    Canada
    #16
    I suspect we are just getting better at diagnosing nickel allergies, rather than an actual increase in the prevalence in the population.

    Digging a tad into the literature:

     
  17. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    May 22, 2011
    #17
    Its all about the design, didnt you know? Let Jony Ive remind you
    [​IMG]

     
  18. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2012
  19. macrumors 68020

    T'hain Esh Kelch

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2001
    Location:
    Denmark
    #19
    No, he became allergic to it, especially considering the gradual worsening. There was no indications in the paper that he was allergic to nickel prior to using the iPad.

    I also got nickel allergy from my 1. generation iPad.

    Because a potent allergy inducing product line could become a major health issue forcing Apple to take it off the market?

    Indeed, it is weird they didn't think more about it, especially considering how "green" they want to be these days.
    Your post? Indeed.
     
  20. macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2008
    #20
    He's perfectly within reason to use it without a case.

    Just because you're protective of your tech products doesn't mean that everyone else is too.
     
  21. macrumors 65816

    tevion5

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2011
    Location:
    UCD, Ireland
    #21
    Proper 1950's order in your house!
     
  22. iolinux333, Jul 14, 2014
    Last edited by a moderator: Jul 14, 2014

    macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2014
    #22
    Were not getting better at it, anyone medical knows how common it is and has for decades. It gives people itchy rash. So does poison ivy. So what. If you have a contact allergy with something, don't contact it! Its why there are gold earring posts, tons of people can't do stainless steel earring posts because itchy rash. It is rediculous that this is headline mainstream news. OMG put a $3 cover from amazon on it!
     
  23. macrumors 6502a

    TheIguana

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2004
    Location:
    Canada
    #23
    Doubtful, nickel is a relatively common allergen. It typically manifests as a type 4 hypersensitivity of the allergic contact dermatitis type. While irritating it isn't as severe as a food allergy that could be deadly. For instance, because of that I doubt we are going to see the same reaction schools have had towards nuts over the last decade or so in foods with nickel.

    It would be more likely that reports like this push manufactures to gradually reduce their reliance of nickel on the cosmetic portions of their devices.
     
  24. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2011
    #24
    What they really meant to say is that it was a Samsung Galaxy S5 thatc caused the rash. There has been a 'rash' of deception coming out of that company, trying to make Apple look bad, and the like, and this is where the story got lost on the readers.
     
  25. macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    May 1, 2014
    #25
    200+ million of those things are around and I've never heard anyone have an allergy. Some people are allergic to anything I guess.
     

Share This Page