iPad Mini Confirmed to Run 32-Nanometer A5 Chip from Samsung

Discussion in 'MacRumors.com News Discussion' started by MacRumors, Nov 1, 2012.

  1. macrumors bot

    MacRumors

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2001
    #1
    [​IMG]


    While iFixit was busy tearing down the iPad mini earlier today, Chipworks was taking a closer look at the chips included in the device. The item of most interest is of course the A5 system-on-a-chip, and Chipworks has unsurprisingly confirmed that the iPad mini uses a chip manufactured by Samsung on a 32-nanometer process.

    The A5 originally appeared based on a 45-nanometer process, but Apple quietly shifted to a smaller and more efficient 32-nanometer process earlier this year with the launch of the revised iPad 2 and the third-generation Apple TV back in April. The same chip made its way into the fifth-generation iPod touch last month, so it should not be a surprise that the A5 used in the iPad mini is the same part.
    [​IMG]
    Cross-sections of the A5 chip from the iPad mini appear identical to those from other recent A5 chips, indicating that Samsung is indeed still the supplier for the main chip used in Apple's iOS devices. Apple's has been rumored to be trying to move chip production to TSMC, but the process has been a slow one as Apple seeks to strike a deal and ensure that technical considerations will not hinder the shift.

    Article Link: iPad Mini Confirmed to Run 32-Nanometer A5 Chip from Samsung
     
  2. macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2011
    Location:
    Lusaka, Zambia(If you know where it is)
    #2
    Sweet. Cant wait to see the A6X internals.
     
  3. macrumors member

    adamryan1983

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2011
    #3
    Seems reasonable, ipad mini doesn't require an a5x
     
  4. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2011
    #4
    How about RAM?
     
  5. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2012
    #5
    What.
     
  6. macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2010
    Location:
    Illinois
    #6
    Apple is gonna sue themselves
     
  7. macrumors 68000

    nick_elt

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2011
    #7
    Still would prefer an a6 with 1gig ram. I want a mini ipad, not a watered down mini ipad.

    ----------

    512mb only
     
  8. macrumors member

    Junipr

    Joined:
    May 4, 2011
    #8
    Isn't it crazy that Apple is still working with Samsung??

    The answer is yes.
     
  9. macrumors 68040

    D.T.

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2011
    Location:
    Vilano Beach, FL
    #9
    I would've preferred if it had an A6, and a better GPU with a retina screen. Heck, I don't even care if it was physically bigger with a larger display...

    ... oh wait.
     
  10. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2007
    Location:
    Whitefish Bay, WI
    #10
    You have to wonder how these conversations with Samsung go with the elephant in the room.
     
  11. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2011
    #11
    Changing suppliers for complicated components takes time. They must give time to TSMC to get their affairs in order too.

    Rest assured that Samsung won't manufacturing for Apple for long. They just kill any chance of future business with Apple.
     
  12. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2011
    #12
    I can't believe people are buying the mini at this price point. It's already obsolete. I give it 3 months and we're going to start seeing people talk about how there mini is so sluggish.
     
  13. macrumors 68000

    iGrip

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2010
    #13
    apple really needs Samsung's expertise. For all the bitching and moaning by some that they would never buy a Samsung product, because Samsung is some sort of evil incarnate of a company, and for all the prognostications that Apple will drop Samsung and somehow leave them high and dry, it seems that Apple needs Samsung. Without Samsung, Apple would be in big trouble.

    Nobody has the expertise of Samsung. Nobody compares.
     
  14. macrumors 6502a

    Chrjy

    Joined:
    May 19, 2010
    Location:
    UK
    #14
    Retina screen would have been nice but I don't understand why people get so hung up on specs! Essentially it's an iPad not a MacBook Pro, it's not like we're running CS6 on it or something. The A5 runs the iPad perfectly well...don't see the issue myself.
     
  15. macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2011
    Location:
    Lusaka, Zambia(If you know where it is)
    #15
    I wouldn't call it obsolete, but the nexus 7 is definitely the best buy for a 7 inch tablet right now.

    The iPad mini does look really nice and has the advantage of better apps
     
  16. macrumors 6502a

    bboucher790

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2007
    #16
    Comment winner.
     
  17. macrumors 68000

    nick_elt

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2011
    #17
    For what, most pointless comment of the thread?
     
  18. macrumors 68020

    pgiguere1

    Joined:
    May 28, 2009
    Location:
    Montreal, Canada
    #18
    Apple has switched their entire product line to 32nm.

    The early iPad 4 release was probably only to abandon 45nm completely, as the iPad 3 was their last product to use a 45nm chip (A5X). The iPad 2, iPhone 5, Apple TV and iPod touch had all moved to 32nm already. Counterintuitively, the A6X is probably cheaper to produce than the A5X because of this.
     
  19. macrumors 68000

    nick_elt

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2011
    #19
    Has the 4s moved to 32nm? I havent heard that.
     
  20. macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2011
    Location:
    Lusaka, Zambia(If you know where it is)
    #20
    I still don't get what all the moaning is about. The iPad 3 is excellent, and is in no way obsolete. It can run all the apps the iPad 4 can, and has all the iOS features, with the same display. It'll only become obsolete next year, when iOS 7 is released and Apple cripple some features. IT WOULD HAVE ALSO BEEN THE CASE IF IT WAS LAUNCHED IN MARCH

    People get so worked up over a speed difference
     
  21. macrumors 68040

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2006
    #21
    Maybe because Samsung is so big, the divisions are treated like separate, autonmous companies, with the name just being coincidental. I've read this of course, but its a bit hard to visualize.
     
  22. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2011
    #22
    For this price and the release date it is absolutely obsolete. We can argue about whether retina shoulda/coulda. But the A5 and system memory is a disgrace. This is a cash grab for Apple plain and simple.
     
  23. macrumors 6502a

    nylonsteel

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2010
    #23
    re original article

    ahh -
    reminds me of the days I use to roam the great cathedrals of silicon fabs
    Back in the day
     
  24. Rocketman, Nov 1, 2012
    Last edited: Nov 1, 2012

    macrumors 603

    Rocketman

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2001
    Location:
    Claremont, CA
    #24
    The wide range of products serviced by A5 Gen 2 is astounding. All price points too. This is the one folks should keep an eye on. I understand there are a couple technical aspects of TSMC Apple is interested in besides simply fab capacity for Gen 3.

    Rocketman

    cite:
    http://forums.macrumors.com/showpost.php?p=16024766&postcount=10
     
  25. Chrjy, Nov 1, 2012
    Last edited: Nov 1, 2012

    macrumors 6502a

    Chrjy

    Joined:
    May 19, 2010
    Location:
    UK
    #25
    I think people misunderstand memory. As long as the developer uses and releases memory as and when needed, 512MB is fine. Of course it's always nice to have more memory but ultimately only if you have a number of apps open which of course the iPad doesn't do the same way as a standard desktop/laptop.
     

Share This Page