NASDAQ is down 2.38% so this may need a little context.
----------
This is true but, of course, that mainly matters locally. Whichever carrier has the best service in the region where you spend the most time is going to be a deciding factor for the average person who is on the fence (and is doing some research). That is, unless you are a business traveller, do I care how many bars I get in Albuquerque if I live in Seattle?
Apparently the market didn't think the launch was successful considering Apple has reached new 52 week lows again today.
Currently down 2.28%
Apple has introduced nothing new and the market is beyond impatient.
The iRing, iTV, iBS is getting old and even MacRumors has more posts about competitors than it does regarding Apple Rumors or "Real" Apple news.
A new carrier launch isn't going to dig AAPL out of the slump that it's in.
----------
This is true but, of course, that mainly matters locally. Whichever carrier has the best service in the region where you spend the most time is going to be a deciding factor for the average person who is on the fence (and is doing some research). That is, unless you are a business traveller, do I care how many bars I get in Albuquerque if I live in Seattle?
I think they are all different and you have to look at it that way. VZ and AT&T offer more LTE than Sprint and T-Mo, also speaking there are more phones on both, if T-Mo gets more customers I am sure the speeds will not be that great, also their service is not the same as VZ and AT&T. Sprint IMO needs to be worried now that you can get all this on T-Mo, they IMO again beat Sprint hands down, and their speeds are not too shabby either from what I have been reading.