iPod nano 100%

Discussion in 'iPod' started by aethier, Sep 14, 2005.

  1. aethier macrumors 6502a

    aethier

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2003
    Location:
    Montréal, Canada
    #1
    well i got my white 4g iPod nano today, i am quite impressed, and it seems that I am not the only one.


    Link to 100% score


    nice read

    adam
     
  2. Jay42 macrumors 65816

    Jay42

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2005
    #2
    Nice, I was kind of planning on a shuffle sometime just for walking dogs, running, skiing, etc. since my 30gig ipod stops after about 20 min of jogging. So I don't really need a nano, but they are so damn cool. *Tries to drown out urges to drive to dangerously close apple store*
     
  3. Merf macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2004
    Location:
    Northern California
    #3
    Yeah I played around with one a few days back at bestbuy. They are freakin sweet!

    Merf
     
  4. iriejedi macrumors 6502a

    iriejedi

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2000
    Location:
    Nor Cal
    #4
    GREATEST HITS ALBUM

    With nearly 1400 cds in my collection and about 800 on my 40 gig iPod photo - I look to the 4 gig Nano as the greatest greatest hits album ever produced!!!!

    Support the Mother Ship -

    Buy APPLE!



     
  5. CubaTBird macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2004
    #5
    is it just me or does the nano have a bunch of dead space between the screen and the scroll wheel. :confused:
     
  6. shadowmoses macrumors 68000

    shadowmoses

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2005
    #6
    Its just you...












    No seriously the space looks big on the pics but because its so small it actually isnt very much and makes sure your thumb doesnt go over the screen when using the click wheel,

    SHadOW
     
  7. Scarlet Fever macrumors 68040

    Scarlet Fever

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2005
    Location:
    Bookshop!
    #7
    or maybe its coz they squashed a lot of iPod into a very small case, and the way it was designed meant that the scroll wheel couldnt be too close to the screen. Just like the G5 iMacs big white 'void' under the screen; its got some pretty good tech under it.
     
  8. cube macrumors G4

    Joined:
    May 10, 2004
    #8
    0% because it has no FireWire, so it's unusable for many people.
     
  9. JupiterTwo macrumors 6502

    JupiterTwo

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2003
    Location:
    GB
    #9
    But perfectly usable by many more people.
     
  10. mpw Guest

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2004
    #10
    There are sound reasons for it not having FW and as said above the number of people that omitting FW effects because they don't have USB pales compared to the number of people who would have no use for FW or would lose out by it's inclusion.
     
  11. cube macrumors G4

    Joined:
    May 10, 2004
    #11
    I don't care about PCs
     
  12. dops7107 macrumors 6502a

    dops7107

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2005
    Location:
    Perth, Oztrailya
    #12
    hmm, but unfortunately for you, Apple does.
     
  13. mpw Guest

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2004
    #13
    What's that got to do with it?
    I'll wager the reason FW was left off was down to the size of the nano as it would've needed it's on controller chip etc.
    It wouldn't have made any sense to have FW in place of USB because it would've limited sales and it's the PC users sales that Apple wants if it wants to be able to provide Apple users with things like iTMS and (relativly) cheap music players.
     
  14. Mord macrumors G4

    Mord

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2003
    Location:
    UK
    #14
    stop bitching about the lack of firewire, it was for space saveing, usb 1 is not that slow just leave your ipod to fill up for an hour, i too dont have a single mac with usb2 (ibook g3 2x g4 cubes).
     

Share This Page