iPod nano or iPod classic

Discussion in 'iPod' started by kevinti2004, Oct 8, 2007.

  1. macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2007
    #1
    I am thinking to get the new ipod nano, but if I add 50 dollars then i get the 80 gb iPod classic. can anyone who has the new nano tell me how is it? how about iPod classic?
     
  2. Moderator emeritus

    EricNau

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2005
    Location:
    San Francisco, CA
    #2
    Based on my experience, the nanos last longer, and for that reason alone, I would buy the nano.

    As a bonus, you also have the option of using Nike+ with the nano.
     
  3. macrumors 68040

    Scarlet Fever

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2005
    Location:
    Bookshop!
    #3
    Now that the new nano has a big screen, the only differences between them are cost, size, battery life and capacity.

    So when you think of which one to buy, consider how much stuff you have now, and if battery life is important. They are both awesome devices, but if you have more than 8 GB of media, the nano isn't for you.
     
  4. thread starter macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2007
    #4
    true!! i was thinking get ipod classic 80 g for the extra capacity, but all my friends with ipod they told me they didnt even use half of the space..
     
  5. macrumors regular

    mickhyperion

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2004
    #5
    Even with a seemingly limited capacity such as 8gb, there is no reason you can't switch out your media at anytime. Change your music and movie selections while it's charging, once a week or once a day or however often you feel like it. Unless you NEED to carry your entire collection all the time, go with the size, convenience, and cool factor of the nano. A full ipod is very bulky (read: geeky) by comparison.
     
  6. thread starter macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2007
    #6
    Thanks!!!
     

Share This Page