iPod Touch capacity is way too low

Discussion in 'iPod touch' started by Jim on the Wall, Sep 5, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2007
    #1
    For $50 less, you can get an iPod with ten times the capacity.
     
  2. macrumors G3

    clevin

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2006
    #2
    I strongly suggest people stop treating iPod touch as a traditional iPod, A.K.A. a music/video player.
     
  3. macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2007
    Location:
    Mississauga, ON
    #3
    Couldn't agree more. They should've made the iPod touch hard drive based and a bit thicker. Now I have to buy the iPod classic along with an iPhone.
     
  4. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2003
    #4
    I wouldn't be surprised if iPod Touch became the best-selling iPod.
     
  5. macrumors 65816

    steamboat26

    Joined:
    May 25, 2006
    Location:
    Arlington VA
    #5
    I don't think that the iPod Classic and iPod touch are designed to cater to the same market. The Classic is for the people who still like the click wheel, and have a massive library of music. The iPod touch is seemingly designed to cater to the market that wants a multifuction device, which is seen in the fact that it has Safari and Youtube.
     
  6. thread starter macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2007
    #6
    Yeah, stupid me. Of course iPods aren't meant to be used for music and videos...



    No matter how you spin it, ten times the capacity for a cheaper price is a major deterrent (7 episodes of Lost and 1600 songs alone are 11GB on my 5.5G iPod)
     
  7. Administrator

    Doctor Q

    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2002
    Location:
    Kepler-452b
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page