Iran's oil exports may disappear

Discussion in 'Politics, Religion, Social Issues' started by obeygiant, Dec 26, 2006.

  1. obeygiant macrumors 68040

    obeygiant

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2002
    Location:
    totally cool
    #1
    http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/iran_oil

    MUHUHAHAHAHAA. The plan is working. *wrings hands*
     
  2. princealfie macrumors 68030

    princealfie

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2006
    Location:
    Salt Lake City UT
    #2
    That isn't suprising. I can't wait until ALL OF THE OIL is gone. Then we can celebrate. Get rid of f****** cars finally. No more dead pedestrians.
     
  3. iMeowbot macrumors G3

    iMeowbot

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2003
    #3
    The actual paper, for anyone who's interested. This is really not about peak oil or even foreign government relations, it's about a combination of internal economic policy and the red tape faced by would-be foreign investors. The gloom and doom conclusion is based on "what if the powers that be in Iran choose not to alter those policies?"
     
  4. obeygiant thread starter macrumors 68040

    obeygiant

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2002
    Location:
    totally cool
    #4
    that was awesome, you cut right to the chase.

    Like it or not, the Iran must "play ball" one way or another.
     
  5. Dont Hurt Me macrumors 603

    Dont Hurt Me

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2002
    Location:
    Yahooville S.C.
    #5
    Dont be so certain, for 1 they have a lot of oil and a very large % of Opec, for 2 its been doing well without western help and with China scrambling to make deals with any Oil Producer...Iran can laugh at George. I can just guess at the backdoor deals signed with the likes of China,Russia and whoever wants Oil and thats the whole world.
     
  6. SMM macrumors 65816

    SMM

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2006
    Location:
    Tiger Mountain - WA State
    #6
    You are very wise. I did a research paper for Poly Sci about the effectiveness of trade embargo's as a tool in forcing policy change. It seemed clear from my research that success was diametrically influenced by world market demand for the country's goods. Oil is about as high a demand commodity as you can find. You also picked the main country which would thumb their nose at an embargo, regardless of whether they belonged to a coalition enforcing the policy.....China. The Chinese are probably the purest capitalists on earth. They are the Ferengi of our solar system. Russia has great oil reserves of their own, although I am unsure how much they may be required to import, mainly due to not fully exploiting their own resources.
     
  7. After G macrumors 68000

    After G

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2003
    Location:
    California
    #7
    I don't think getting rid of vehicles is ideal, as the food transport of the US depends on oil. Diesel comes from crude oil. I wish that human-powered transportation or public transportation was much more effectively implemented here, though.
     
  8. zimv20 macrumors 601

    zimv20

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2002
    Location:
    toronto
    #8
    "soylent gas is people!"
     
  9. mactastic macrumors 68040

    mactastic

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2003
    Location:
    Colly-fornia
    #9
    And you wonder why they want nuclear technology...
     
  10. obeygiant thread starter macrumors 68040

    obeygiant

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2002
    Location:
    totally cool
    #10
    I dont wonder why they want it. Ahmadinejad has already stated he wants to wipe Israel off the map. That couldn't be more clear.
     
  11. valdore macrumors 65816

    valdore

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2007
    Location:
    Kansas City, Missouri. USA
    #11
    I kind of agree. It does sicken me how our society has taken to designing all of its postwar neighborhoods around the private automobile - building things on the scale of the car and not the human body. Sprawl.
     
  12. mactastic macrumors 68040

    mactastic

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2003
    Location:
    Colly-fornia
    #12
    Oooo another one of those righties who believes anything that drops from the lips of our enemies. Glad to see you let terrorists think for you! Many, if not most, righties do apparently.

    So lets see... Ahmedinejad is wholly telling the truth when he says he wants to wipe Israel off the map, and wholly lying when he says his nuclear program is for civilian use only. And you are the one who can tell the difference between them. Funny how that works to your ideological advantage, no?
     
  13. Queso macrumors G4

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2006
    #13
    Aren't most current oil producers exports going to dry up soon? I thought that was the reason why Dubai is desperately trying to re-invent itself as a tourist centre.
     
  14. Blue Velvet Moderator emeritus

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2004
    #14


    In one way, perhaps. But in others? No. Virtually anything of any economic importance over there is state-owned or managed by apparatchiks.


    http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/story/0,,1985891,00.html
     
  15. obeygiant thread starter macrumors 68040

    obeygiant

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2002
    Location:
    totally cool
    #15
    LOL. So you think he said that to be cute? I'm not sure I understand the point you are trying to make here, but If you are trying to side with Ahmedinejad and defend his positions and political outlook...good luck. Why would he say such a thing a not mean it?
     
  16. mactastic macrumors 68040

    mactastic

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2003
    Location:
    Colly-fornia
    #16
    Um... because he's a politician?

    Do you think he said he wants a civilian only nuclear program to be cute? Why would he say such a thing and not mean it?

    I just can't believe you really are so gullible that you fall for every utterance of this clown.

    And you're really pushing the boundaries of good taste by insinuating that I'm trying to side with Ahmedinejad just because I disagree with you. Is that all you righties can come up with?
     
  17. solvs macrumors 603

    solvs

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2002
    Location:
    LaLaLand, CA
    #17
    Well... yeah.

    Low blow og. Not what he meant at all and you know it. Point is most of us don't trust Iran. We just don't trust the Bush administration to deal with it, anymore than we think Ahmedinejad actually could do anything about Israel if they wanted to.
     

Share This Page