"Is Asia Sleep-Walking Into War?"

Discussion in 'Politics, Religion, Social Issues' started by eric/, Feb 11, 2013.

  1. Guest

    eric/

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2011
    Location:
    Ohio, United States
    #1
    So, to break up the monotony of monotony, I found a quick, nice article on CNN about some of the recent tension and near-misses in Asia, particularly between Japan and China.

    What do you guys think? Are China and Japan just stirring the pot for political gain at home? Could this lead to an actual conflict? Maybe not a full-scale war, but a skirmish at least?

    What are your feelings on this situation?
     
  2. macrumors 68000

    VulchR

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2009
    Location:
    Scotland
    #2
    The islands that Japan and PRC are fighting over are also claimed by Taiwan (something nobody seems to discuss); the two Korea's seem to be farther apart than ever; and the PRC, Vietnam and the Philippines have had local disputes over islands. If North Korea creates a viable nuclear weapon that can be delivered by a missile, then an arc of contiguous countries from Russia to Pakistan will all be so armed (and of course perhaps also Iran). All in all, I do wonder if Asia is headed for war. It doesn't look good.
     
  3. macrumors 6502a

    shinji

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2007
    #3
  4. thread starter Guest

    eric/

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2011
    Location:
    Ohio, United States
    #4
    Interesting, I wasn't aware of that. I think it's unlikely, but again, it appears to be something to be monitored. Because wars can whip up in a quick fashion.
     
  5. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2010
    Location:
    Ireland
    #5
    [ based only on what I read on the internet , probably all wrong , not intended to offend , gross generalisations abound ]

    It is an interesting dynamic. It seems everyone in South East/East Asia dislikes Japan and fears China. Then you throw in the US trying to build a modern day wall of China around China to keep it down. And Russia up north. And everyone one else with their fingers crossed because every second thing you use seems to be made in China.
     
  6. macrumors G4

    Eraserhead

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2005
    Location:
    UK
    #6
    Yeah I think that sums it up. Fundamentally the Japanese haven't really apologised properly for their appalling behaviour during world war 2.

    On the other side the Chinese foreign policy is usually pretty ham-fisted, and they also haven't fully accepted that the Europeans essentially invented international law and that you have to just go with it - even if it means accepting less territory than was claimed but not really fully controlled by Imperial China.
     
  7. macrumors 68000

    Sydde

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    #7
  8. macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2004
    Location:
    afk
    #8
    It may be true for the older generation. Those people involved in WW2 are now more than 70 years old. Most of the current young/middle age people in SE Asia or in my country do not view Japan negatively at all. On the other hand, there are still some people who keep holding on to old grudges and refuse to move on.
     
  9. macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2012
    Location:
    Singapore
    #9
    I heard it was because they didn't want the repercussions of their ancestors' actions to have a negative impact on the current generation. This may also be the reason why most of the information regarding their role in the war has been omitted from their history textbooks.
     
  10. macrumors 68000

    VulchR

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2009
    Location:
    Scotland
    #10
    Yep. As I said above, worrisome. It seems like many countries in Asia are choosing escalation rather than stability. And the US isn't exactly being conciliatory....
     
  11. thread starter Guest

    eric/

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2011
    Location:
    Ohio, United States
    #11
    And of course Japan and South Korea are going to want to continue to bolster their militaries in response to these tests and threats. Just wish the US would develop a legit missile defense system to put a stop to this madness.
     
  12. macrumors G4

    Eraserhead

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2005
    Location:
    UK
    #12
    Agreed.
     
  13. macrumors G4

    Eraserhead

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2005
    Location:
    UK
    #13
    Even if they aren't as open as the Germans with the Holocaust or the Chinese with the cultural revolution the Japanese could at least manage to act like they are embarrassed about their World War 2 past.
     
  14. macrumors 6502

    Prototypical

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2011
    Location:
    Nebraska
    #14
    Conceding to North Korea's antics is no different than caving to a belligerent child... All it does is reinforce the idea that threating neighbors with missle launches and nuclear weapon tests gets NK the food and supplies it wants (not that it shares any of that with its population, of course). What would you propose the US do?

    Honestly, I think China needs to step up and smack its obnoxious neighbor in the mouth. China has long supported NK but I think the escalation is even starting to frustrate the Chinese government. Given that China won't let the rest of the world do anything to help the NK people, it should shoulder the responsibility for getting these belligerent acts reined in. Besides, I doubt China really wants South Korea and the US at its doorstep should things degrade further.
     
  15. macrumors 603

    firestarter

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2002
    Location:
    Green and pleasant land
    #15
    But they don't think about things in the same way as you or I.

    Read some anthropology (The Chrysanthemum and the Sword is a very apposite text). Their assumptions regarding an individual's place in society are fundamentally different to ours - and that pervades their thinking from surrendering in war to the treatment of POWs.

    On the subject of the nuclear strikes on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, they hold the opinion that they were unnecessary 'live experiments' carried out by the US. I don't share the opinion that they were unnecessary, but I do appreciate that such a violent act isn't going to be welcomed by any recipient nation. As they say... 'history books are written by the victor'; it's interesting that we're still putting up statues to Bomber Harris, while a statue of Herman Goring being erected in Germany wouldn't be quite so welcome.

    I won't wish to be apologetic for the Japanese, but it's an error to read their stance across the board as arrogant/unembarrassed by assuming they're seeing the world through the lenses of your cultural assumptions.
     
  16. macrumors 68030

    G51989

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2012
    Location:
    NYC NY/Pittsburgh PA
    #16
    I highly doubt Asia will go into full scale war, Japan the US are just to strong for the Chinese to deal with, I doubt they would start a war over something trivial.
     
  17. macrumors G4

    Eraserhead

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2005
    Location:
    UK
    #17
    Japan vs China would probably end in a draw. Japan didn't do that well in the 1930's when China was very weak.
     
  18. macrumors 68000

    VulchR

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2009
    Location:
    Scotland
    #18
    I agree about PRC smacking down NK. In this regard, I think the PRC will rue the day the decided to use NK as a proxy.

    However, I worry that recent moves by the to strengthen ties with countries around the PRC will be perceived by the PRC as encirclement. I am not anti-US, but we need to proceed carefully. People in the PRC still have a sense of grievance from the occupation of their country by the West, followed by the Japanese Empire. As far as I can tell, the average person in the PRC is not trying to dominate the world, but instead they believe they are acting to protect their own back yard. As for the government of the PRC, who knows? I must say I do not trust that regime.
     
  19. macrumors 68000

    Happybunny

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2010
    Location:
    's-Hertogenbosch Netherlands
    #19
    I must say this is how I read the situation. You notice how China is only heard in the UN when the subject is about interfering in another countries internal affairs. This is now a golden rule, China through out the late 19th and early 20th centuries was subject to European humiliation, it will not be allowed to happen again.
     
  20. macrumors 68030

    G51989

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2012
    Location:
    NYC NY/Pittsburgh PA
    #20
    The kind of Island hoping warfare that you would end up seeing would give Japan the win, they would also have the US Navy on their side. China might have numbers, but their military technology is rather primitive, and they lack power projection.
     
  21. macrumors G4

    Eraserhead

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2005
    Location:
    UK
    #21
    In which case the Chinese wouldn't lose any territory so I'm not clear how they'd lose such a conflict.

    You're also assuming the US would join in - their record isn't exactly amazing.
     
  22. thread starter Guest

    eric/

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2011
    Location:
    Ohio, United States
    #22
    The US has a defense treaty with Japan. If we honored it, which I'd say is likely, than the US would step right in.

    What record are you talking about, btw?
     
  23. macrumors G4

    Eraserhead

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2005
    Location:
    UK
    #23
    ww1, ww2
     
  24. thread starter Guest

    eric/

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2011
    Location:
    Ohio, United States
    #24
    Ok so we're going to gauge the US's record of involvement and probability of involvement with an ally the US has to defend by the US not initially participating in World War 1 or 2?.
     
  25. macrumors 68000

    Happybunny

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2010
    Location:
    's-Hertogenbosch Netherlands
    #25
    That I don't understand.
    WWI was nothing to do with them it was a wholly European Problem and war. Until the sinking of a passenger liner in 1917 the US was not directly involved.

    WW II again this started as a purely European war Germany allied themselves with Japan and in 1941 Japan attacked the US.

    You can't have it both ways, either you are against America ever intervening, or America always has the right to interven in any war. (or is it only when it benefits the UK that it isOK.)?
     

Share This Page