Is Micro$oft taking Apple ideas again ?

Discussion in 'Macintosh Computers' started by Remus, May 6, 2003.

  1. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2002
    Location:
    Newcastle, Washington (Bill's backyard)
    #1
    I do not know if this is the right area to post this. This article talks about how Micro$oft wants to "to help computer makers develop a new generation of PCs and reinvigorate the stagnant industry." so that "Microsoft wants to work with hardware vendors earlier, as soon as they create new PC technologies, so that they can synchronize hardware and software development and produce better computers."

    The article even talks about how Apple is doing it. "That's the approach taken by Apple Computer, which develops both software and hardware in-house and is credited with numerous innovations to the ire of Gates and other leaders in the Windows PC industry." :)

    What kind of impact will this have on Apple? :confused:

    http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/businesstechnology/134689749_winhec06.html

    If this is not the are to post please move to the correct are....
     
  2. macrumors 68040

    patrick0brien

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2002
    Location:
    The West Loop
    #2
    -Remus

    Well, I suppose we'll see - anything would be an improvement.

    But these are only two of the triumvirate of WinTel. They would need to get far more further involved in the design of the chips with Intel, and I don't see Intel doing that any time soon.

    But to make it truly effective - eliminating the classic WinTel peeves, MS and Intel would have to abandon the x86 architecture and the Windows architecture completely and start over to make a truly modern offering. And I really don't see that with all the legacy they have to support.

    Are they copying Apple? When are they not? Seriously.
     
  3. thread starter macrumors member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2002
    Location:
    Newcastle, Washington (Bill's backyard)
    #3
    Yes we will see. But it just angers me that Micro$oft has, after 20 years, finally decided to try to make thier software work with the hardware. If they had done that from the begining things would have definately been different. :mad:

    Maybe I am just over reacting to this. Maybe M$ will screw this up to.... :p

    Just an after thought. Is M$ really concerned about Apple's <5% market? or have they caught wind of whats in the pipeline for Apple and concerned about that?

    just a thought or two to munch over.... :D
     
  4. macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2003
    #4
    yeah, micro$oft has always copied apple. but i mean who hasn't. i think Microsoft will just use this hardware software integration for marketing reasons cause they obviously can't do much without screwing it up.
     
  5. macrumors 68040

    mac15

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2001
    Location:
    Sydney
    #5
    well this is what apple has bene doing forever. Making SW for the hardware and visa-vera.

    And then M$ have the nerve to say its revolutionary.
     
  6. macrumors 68040

    patrick0brien

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2002
    Location:
    The West Loop
    #6
    -Gents

    Let's not forget Sun. They make the hardware and the OS as well (Solaris). So they fit into this picture as well.
     
  7. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2003
    Location:
    New York
    #7
    Let's also not forget that this is the way of the world. Everyone copies everyone. It's part of competition. Only good can come of it.

    Dare I say it, but Apple has copied Microsoft's ideas on numerous occasions as well.
     
  8. macrumors 68040

    patrick0brien

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2002
    Location:
    The West Loop
    #8
    -frozenstar

    Very true. Though nowhere near as much - or as significant.

    The flow of copying (I call it Aping because MS changes it a little) is so significantly flowing toward MS it's still essentially a one-way street.
     
  9. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2003
    Location:
    New York
    #9
    No argument here. I definitely regard Microsoft as one of the biggest inhibitors to innovation in the industry. It looks like most of the development that goes into their software is geared toward making Microsoft's life easier, not the end-users'.
     
  10. thread starter macrumors member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2002
    Location:
    Newcastle, Washington (Bill's backyard)
    #10
    And Money in thier pocket...

    Cha Ching $$$$$
     
  11. macrumors 68040

    patrick0brien

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2002
    Location:
    The West Loop
    #11
    -frozenstar

    I often refer to Microsoft as "The place where innovation goes to die."
     
  12. macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    May 3, 2003
    Location:
    City of Portland, Oregon
    #12
    Always!

    do we really need to ask if MS is stealing apples ideas? they've always been doing it, its just too bad apple always perfects it, and MS always makes it slower, isn't that why they need faster processors?
     
  13. macrumors 68000

    AppleMatt

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2003
    Location:
    UK
    #13
    I posted a while ago that a few days after the piles rumors were flying around in the Mac community, a few days later Microsoft released their latest beta of Longhorn and announced a new feature...

    ...stacks!

    They also said they had no implementation as yet to test, but to look out for it.

    I'm sure Apple are aware, or at least I hope they are.

    AppleMatt
     
  14. macrumors 6502a

    MorganX

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2003
    Location:
    Midwest
    #14
    Did you ever think maybe "piles" suddenly resurfaced because of what Apple may have gleaned about Longohorn? It's been in development for some time.

    Too often Apple settles for being "first." Quartz Extreme? Wonder if Microsoft will have better font smoothing.

    I like the mac, better than the PC. But to me, finishing unfinished business is not stealing.

    I still can't right-click in a folder and clean it up or arrange the view.

    I'd rather see Apple continue to work on their stuff, to completion and let MS do what MS will do.

    BTW, if MS can't get an OS right after all these years, what makes you think they can develop new technology in a week or two. Both camps are always workign on similar technology. They both leak for mindshare when appropriate. IMO anyway.
     
  15. macrumors 68040

    patrick0brien

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2002
    Location:
    The West Loop
    #15
    -MorganX

    I almost sounds like you are defending MS as if they invented the "piles" paradigm.

    Apple holds an active patent on the idea this time.
     
  16. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2003
    Location:
    Texas
    #16
    Again implies that Microsoft stopped at one point.
     
  17. macrumors 68020

    jayscheuerle

    #17
    Microsoft's font smoothing is far more readable than OSX's.

    As a matter of fact, OS9 had better font smoothing as well with QuickDraw.

    OSX has sacrificed legibility in favor of typeface rendering accuracy. As pixel density on displays increases, this will be a boon, but for now it means fuzziness at smaller point sizes.

    - j
     
  18. acj
    macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2003
    #18
    I think the window shuttering as it moves sounds cool.

    Windows 3.1 played minimized movies as an icon. OSX coppied that. Windows 95 introduced the taskbar. The Dock is more similar to that than the old NeXT dock... Windows 95 had DMA, OSX FINALLY adopted that...

    In the early 1910s Peugeut made car engines that were what we now call "modern" Dual Over Head Cam designs. All manufacturers are finally copying that.

    It's all just competition. Just as Apple "adopted" AGP and USB and dozens of other hardware items, MS will "adopt" pretty visual effects in software.

    You always argue the points that make your argument simple. MS coppies software. Mac coppies hardware. Sometimes it goes the other way. But it almost ALWAYS makes an improvement.
     
  19. macrumors 6502a

    MorganX

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2003
    Location:
    Midwest
    #19
    Patents are more about habit and the filing fee than innovation. The first person to file a patent is not necessarily the innovator or creator. I really haven't seen piles at work, but gathering related files in a single location is hardly an Apple innovation though they may have filed a patent. OS/2 had this feature. And I'm not sure I like the circular piles I saw somewhere, looks messy.

    Apple can only patent "their" implementation. And even if they get the patent, it may not hold up in court.

    I just don't think MS is stealing anythying in this case.
     
  20. macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2003
    #20
    Re: Always!

    very good point
     
  21. macrumors 68020

    jayscheuerle

    #21
    Re: Always!

    Apple hardly perfects anything. They're excellent at polishing the paint-job that sells. Image is everything, right?

    You want slower? Just remember moving from OS9 to OSX. We're all here hoping that the 970 will finally make OSX feel as snappy as OS9.

    What about USB 2.0? There's no reason other than politics that any Apple machine updated in the past 6 months hasn't included it. Sure we have firewire, but that's a different forte.

    There's theivery on both sides of the market. What Apple has always been able to sell is elegance. MS can ape it or mock it, but it's obvious that they're struggling to understand it. Lots of people know it when they see it, but few can create it. MS has the money to hire the best interface designers out there, but they don't know what they're looking for. Lord knows what Apple products would have looked like without Jonathan Ive. He's probably had more of an impact on Apple's fortune than Steve has. Then again, Steve's the master salesman. He can fawn about how icons get sucked into the dock and convince people that load-bearing graphic excess is cool.

    I'm looking for a focus on substance other than style at this point, so the 970s better come in affordably or I'll have little reason to stick with Apple at home, especially if a PC version of iTunes is created.

    - j
     
  22. macrumors 6502a

    MorganX

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2003
    Location:
    Midwest
    #22
    Re: Re: Always!

    True. But the Mac is growing on me. There's so many things missing. Expecialy context-menu implementation. I was happy that in iTunes 4 you can right click on the iPod to Update it or eject it. I couldn't do this previously. If users are too dumb to use the right mouse button, so what? They'll never know how close efficiency is and can keep wasting time traveling up to the finder menu for trivial tasks. So Apple understands how useful proplery implemented context-sensitive menus and a two-button mosue are. So why drag their feat on implementing it as pervasively as MS.

    This tells me it's a political thing. An obsessive resistance. And a company as large as Apple can't/shouldn't have a single individual preventing these type of things. Apple may need Steve Jobs, but they need to be able to tell him, "No, you're wrong." And he needs to listen to why.

    If they don't/can't, the he becomes a Dictator and in time, even the most successful dictatorships fail. All of them.
     
  23. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2001
    #23
    Re: Re: Always!


    uhhh, let me see . . .
    i have a g4 450 and os 10.2 is faster.
     
  24. macrumors 68020

    jayscheuerle

    #24
    Re: Re: Re: Always!

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

    Quit it! You're killing me!! 10.2 faster!!!
    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

    My achin' sides.... whew.... Man, that is rich...
     
  25. macrumors 6502a

    etoiles

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2002
    Location:
    Where the air is crisp
    #25
    Re: Re: Always!

    you are right. But damn, they even copied the Aqua desktop background !
     

Share This Page