1. Welcome to the new MacRumors forums. See our announcement and read our FAQ

Is the sansa e280 an iPod nano killer?

Discussion in 'MacBytes.com News Discussion' started by MacBytes, Oct 17, 2006.

  1. macrumors bot

    #1
  2. Administrator emeritus

    Mudbug

    #2
    hmmmmm.
    nope.
     
  3. macrumors 68000

    Danksi

    #3
    Well there's a problem right there...
     
  4. macrumors 603

    shadowfax

    #4
    The guy seemed to think that to beat an iPod, all you have to do is match the price point for the same capacity, and provide the same or better tech specs (capabilities such as playing music, recording, etc.). He didn't seem to have much of a handle on good design OR platform independence, which any "iPod Killer" would have to master...
     
  5. macrumors 68000

    Silencio

  6. Moderator

    balamw

    Staff Member

    #6
    Interesting article

    Now that Best Buy is in the mix with Real and Sandisk in (essentially) cutting Microsoft out of the loop and creating their own end-to-end experience to compete with Zune and iTunes+iPod it'll be interesting to see where the chips may fall...

    B
     
  7. macrumors 6502a

    iJaz

    #7
    Apple-centric files like .mp3 or what the h*** does he mean?
     
  8. macrumors 6502a

    paddy

    #8
    No, no and....NO!

    Sure we'll throw in another no will we? ;)
     
  9. macrumors 65816

    autrefois

    #9
    I believe it was on The Daily Show that they pointed out that journalism has been reduced to just having crawls or headlines consisting of questions that are not or cannot be substantiated.

    "Is the sansa e280 an iPod nano killer?"

    The article does not even try to answer the question in the headline! The only point of the headline is to get people to read the article. The word "nano" is mentioned but once in the article, in the final paragraph. "iPod" is mention several times, so perhaps the headline ought to have been:

    "Is the sansa e280 an iPod killer?"

    But a careful reading of the article doesn't even support this as a headline. The headline should have simply should have been:

    "Sansa e280 enters mp3 market"

    or arguably

    "Sansa e280: newest iPod competitor"

    But MSNBC apparently isn't concerned with journalism when sensationalism will get more people to read. I'm not turning in my iPod anytime soon, and certainly not after reading this article!
     
  10. macrumors 65816

    Jay42

    #10
    These companies don't understand the most basic things. "Is the Sansa e280 the iPod killer?" Well that question almost answers itself. With a name like Sansa e280, they could never take on the iPod. The name iPod is iconic: everyone knows what you're talking about when you say it, there is no confusion. It's almost reaching the status that kleenex and band-aid have in terms of product recognition.

    "Have you seen the e280?"
    "Oh you mean that little one for like $100?"
    "No that's the c250"
    "Oh, I don't know what you're talking about then"
    "Well it's kinda like the iPod nano"
    "Oh, now I know..."

    The Zune is the best attempt yet, but I still think it's too little too late, especially if Apple releases a phone/widescreen ipod something or other.
     
  11. macrumors 68000

    #11
    No.


    I am putting my foot down. For each iPod killer rumored, I shall torture many BestBuy employees that shift people away from iPods with the guy in my 'tar.
     
  12. macrumors 68020

    #12
    Self-serving ...

    Does it not seem self-serving and a bit biased for someone on Microsoft-NBC to be saying things like "But this is to remind you that there are other good options out there — and the sansa is one of them."?

    IMHO, I can not abide any tech news from MSNBC because I know they have had ... er ... slanted coverage quite often in the past which belies the claim that they can control their corporate biases.

    An anti-iPod news article from MSNBC. Gee, who'da thunk?
     
  13. macrumors 6502

    #13
    "With good-sounding earphones the sansa sounded very, very good I tried WMA and MP3 files ripped at different resolutions (256K, 128K, etc.) and found that 128K WMAs sounded best — with 96K WMAs very, very close behind. "

    yeah... I read that far into the article.

    yeah... that about explains how well educated the writer is on the matter at hand.
     
  14. macrumors 6502a

    wyatt23

    #14
    in a single word.

    no.


    the sansa is not an ipod nano killer. sexy tho. the new nano's are just amazing looking.
     
  15. macrumors 68030

    Analog Kid

    #15
    Educated enough to know who signs his paycheck.

    For someone who seems to like to go into the little technical details about everything, I'm surprised that he didn't point that Microsoft's PlayForSure sure won't play with Microsoft's Zune...
     
  16. macrumors 68040

    ezekielrage_99

    #16
    One words comes to mind.....


    NO
     
  17. macrumors 6502a

    mrsebastian

    #17
    no and [bleep] you, you [bleep] for the "ipod killer" moniker. if anyone in the pr departments of the competitors had a clue, they'd absolutely, positively, never, ever, use that phrase to get their products name out there.
     
  18. macrumors 68000

    #18

    I wonder how he came to the conclusion that 128Kbps sounds better than 256Kbps in the same file format.

    Oh, wait -- 128kbps WMA is 'better than CD quality'. :D :D :D
     
  19. scr
    macrumors newbie

    #19
    I love the fact that the iPod has made usability one of its key features. Nowadays, it's not enough to just have a good-looking mp3 player that sounds terrific. It has to have a well designed ui aswell.

    And this is where the sansa fails.
     
  20. macrumors Core

    #20
    i didn't know there were differen't resolutions to mp3 files. i thought it was bit-rates.
    oh and the iPod can play more than AAC files.

    i hate it when people come across as knowing everything, and then prove that they truely know very little about what they are talking about.
     
  21. macrumors 6502

    #21
    No, it's missing one important feature: iTunes.
     
  22. macrumors 68000

    SPUY767

    #22
    I so desperately wish that I could have scanned the pictures of this thing to show you all. A woman who I work with, I scarcely tolerate her, purchased a, get this, MP4 player off of eBay. When she discovered that the manual was an abberation, she trucked it to me, the IT guy to figure it out. As thought I do not already have enough **** to take care of. I take this thing out of the box, and look at it. Traditional iPod rip-off. . . When i get to the manual however, things go awry. The manual is absolutely unintelligible, phrases like, "The interfacing of the play modes is controlled in the automatic screen." ring out quite clearly in my memory. The final straw was when looked in the corner of each page and saw. . . an Apple logo. I could do nothing but hand it back to her, and say, "I'm sorry Renee, but you should have gotten your daughter a real iPod.
     
  23. macrumors 601

    Anonymous Freak

    #23
    Those kind of unintelligible phrases are nicknamed "Engrish", and there is, appropriately enough, a website dedicated to preserving and mocking them.

    A year or so ago, a friend of mine go a pocket knife that had similar complete-nonsense instructions. Something completely wacky like "to engage the cut hurt small of size persons" or something like that. (Although it was so bad that between four of us, we couldn't figure what in the world it was trying to say.)
     

Share This Page