We have no idea how it will run in VPC since it's not available for Intel Macs yet, and with Q it's considerably slower, but they are making great progress. We'll just have to wait and see what their final release shows.Kingsly said:And if virtualization is used (i.e VPC, Q) it will run slightly below full speed, because the comp is still doing the OSX thing.
vtmaestro said:I did the install on my new mac mini that has only 512 Megs of ram. The install of both operating systems were both pretty long due to the limited amount of memory. Xp is running lighting fast!!!! now that everything is installed. I hate to say it but, XP is running faster than OSX. I'm going to put more memory in this weekend, should help out OSX. I still can't believe that dual boot is finally a reality! I purchased my system on March 18 and found out about dual boot later that night. The next day I do the installs and it is like I have TWO new computers!!!!!
vtmaestro
Timepass said:sounds bad but the truth is OSX is a ram hog compared to XP. A general rule that can be used is an XP computer will run just as well as an OSX computer with 2 times the amount of ram.
For example 256 on XP is about 512 in OSX. 512 on XP is about a gig on OSX. It a general rule but you get the idea.
asencif said:Yeah and some are saying Vista will be a RAM hog too; more than Mac OS X even. So the rule for that might be 512MB in Mac OS X is 1GB in Vista...
Man I rememeber (sic) when 128k was high to haveTimepass said:Man I rememeber when 128 was high to have.
kiwi-in-uk said:Man I rememeber (sic) when 128k was high to have
kiwi-in-uk said:Man I rememeber (sic) when 128k was high to have
That's due in full to the Intel emulation. Running it natively on an Intel chip will be much faster.mulze22 said:If you run an emulation of XP on a mac it is incerdibly slow [...].
mulze22 said:If you run an emulation of XP on a mac it is incerdibly slow but I was wondering how is the speed of XP on an intel machine. Now that this has happened I am thinking about getting a mac mini.
Kingsly said:Wel... right now Q doesn't work for me at all... time will tell.
Fixed it. I had to d/l the latest unstable build. Its a UB so it works.imacintel said:If you are clicking the start button and the PC Doesn't start I am also having that prob!
Why am I not surprised?ReanimationLP said:Vista is a f***ing huge *** RAM hog. Trust me.
Plus the UI is slower than hell.