Is your Mac really more secure?

Discussion in 'MacBytes.com News Discussion' started by MacBytes, Nov 7, 2005.

  1. macrumors bot

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2003
  2. Moderator emeritus

    grapes911

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2003
    Location:
    Citizens Bank Park
    #2
    Yes. Yes, it is. Thanks for asking. Do come again.



    I hate articles like this. Basically, the author is saying "The Mac will fall to a virus. It's only a matter of time." Hasn't come yet, and probably won't come for a long time (if ever). I'll believe it when I see it. Until then, can all the pessimists and doom sayers leave the building?
     
  3. macrumors 6502a

    ibook30

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2005
    Location:
    2,000 light years from home
    #3
    I agree! Haven't seen it yet!

    But- sure it could happen and I still back up all my data, just in case a malware or a hardware crash hits me. But- even if malware was built for OSX - even if several were built, it woud represent a drop in the bucket compared to the multitude of virus' for Windoze. So as a group- Mac users would certainly have a problem, but be able to respond to one or two threats quicker than a platform with hundreds of current threats. So I hope.

    The tone of the article is irritating. Like the writer is saying "... you lousey mac people, I am soooo sick of hearing how you don't get malware. Someday the world will take you down a notch !!! Someday..." (fist shaking at the sky follows....)
     
  4. macrumors 65816

    Seasought

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2005
    #4
    Such a waste

    It's upsetting to know that he was paid for his time to write this. The article has no value at all whatsoever imo. :mad:
     
  5. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2002
    Location:
    Tampa
    #5
    Where? Please don't tell me we're referring to the "proof of concepts" where you delete your HD by running a program that deletes your HD.
    :eek: :rolleyes:

    This guys basic point: Sure, Windows has lots of viruses, but the Mac will eventually maybe probably have some too so there :p .

    <Dane Cook> Meet me outside, I'll be the guy stabbing jaws. </Dane Cook>
     
  6. Moderator emeritus

    grapes911

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2003
    Location:
    Citizens Bank Park
    #6
    Off topic. I'll be seeing Dane Cook live on Wednesday!!!!
     
  7. macrumors 68000

    SPUY767

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2003
    Location:
    GA
    #7
    This article is nothing but speculative rhetoric. The same trash that we've seen grace the pages of such fine publications as News.com, and eWeek. I don't know why it's so difficult for someone to admin that the Mac is just inherently more secure from an architecture standpoint. Hell All I have to tell this ******* is, Win User = Root. . . Mac user = Not Root. . . Any Questions? Get a real job mister tech writer.

    I decided to be nice today, so I am going to say something in his defense. At least he admits in this article, unlike any other that I've read, that virus writers are pining for a Mac virus as a badge of honor. Other tech writers have skirted around this fact so as not to detract from their BS security through obscurity argument.
     
  8. macrumors 6502a

    #8
    Probably what Steve Ballmer said to the Windows development team :)

    The rest, as they say, is history.
     
  9. Moderator emeritus

    angelwatt

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2005
    Location:
    USA
    #9
    The article was a waste of bandwidth. Nothing intelligent was said and nothing others haven't said before.
     
  10. macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2005
  11. macrumors 68000

    Sharewaredemon

    Joined:
    May 31, 2004
    Location:
    Pitch forking mulch in Nova Scotia, Canada
    #11

    Sour Apple is the best flavour...

    :D
     
  12. macrumors G4

    Mord

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2003
    Location:
    Old York
    #12
    Now you see entorage cant execute code that can effect the OS, the worst it can do is send itself on to others, which i'm still not sure about, the mac simply is much much much secure, and as he said hackers want to make "the first" but none have, their is nothing nada ziltch, anyone can make malware, all it takes it writeing a simple script and tricking someone into executing.

    the guy is retarded.
     
  13. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2003
    #13
    One day, a giant meteor will take us all out. That really might be any day now, so Mr. Techwriter better catch up & develop some competence beforehand.

    OTOH, all the Macfaithful will be beamed to safety by Steve's mothership, so why bother.
     
  14. macrumors 68030

    redAPPLE

    Joined:
    May 7, 2002
    Location:
    2 Much Infinite Loops
    #14
    thanks for the read.
     
  15. macrumors 68020

    winmacguy

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2003
    Location:
    New Zealand
    #15
    Proof of concept..........?
    Nah didn't think so........
    Mmmm kay......
    Moving on then.:rolleyes:
     
  16. macrumors 68020

    winmacguy

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2003
    Location:
    New Zealand
  17. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2003
    Location:
    rural Missouri
    #17
    I wrote the following for that site's discussion board

    It will appear there if I can ever get their kludgy software to finish posting it:

    The reply:



    I would like to answer a resounding DUH! to the article "Is Your Mac Really More Secure?" by Gary McGraw, by drawing on a few points that he made.

    Gary wrote: "Apple Macintosh users are quick to point out the dearth of malware, viruses, and security problems in the OS X world. Compared to the Windows/Intel Win32 platform, Mac OS X looks like an attractive alternative, at least when malware is the deciding factor. Win32 machines have suffered from any number of spectacularly successful malcode attacks over the years, and the problem shows no signs of abating."

    I reply: That's because Mac users are at least able to understand the obvious. There are a gazillion malware/virus attackers out there reaping total havoc on the Win32 world, requiring a bunch of third party tools to fix holes that should have been plugged by the OS vendor from the start.

    Gary wrote: "To be completely fair, there have been a few minor OS X-related viruses, and Apple regularly releases security patches. But Win32 is in much worse shape, and Mac users gloat about this all the time."

    I reply: Name ONE. That's right, name me ONE OS X virus in the wild. He is right, there are very few... because ZERO is actually very few. Yes, there have been a couple of proof of concept's shown, but POC's do not spread themselves... I dare you to name me just ONE Mac OS X virus.

    Gary wrote: "What follows is a simple and perhaps ironic prediction of how prideful Mac users will be taken down a notch."

    I reply: Here's the title of this article... "Is Your Mac Really More Secure." The thesis of the article, however, apparently is "If all this bad stuff that I can dream up actually happens some day down the road, Macs will be less secure than they are now." This is both bad writing and editing.

    Gary wrote: "The answer is that Macs represent a challenge. Hackers set out to solve puzzles, take things apart, understand how things work, and on occasion cause trouble. Building an attack that works on Macs will be a badge of honor proudly worn, and work is already under way to see who gets the prize."

    I reply: So... following this logic... someday, somewhere down the road, a hacker is going to come up with something that causes problems for a Mac. Ok, I buy that. Now let's compare that to the state of the Win32 world. I don't need to even begin to tell you what a total security disaster that is from front to finish.

    So someday, somebody is going to put out an exploit that hurts the Mac. I go back to the title, "Is Your Mac Really More Secure?"

    I will grant that this hypothetical exploit will likely happen sometime down the road. Heck, there may even be two or three.

    Let's pull a number out of our hoo-hoo's and pretend that there will be two of them in 2006. I don't honestly believe there will be, but let's pretend anyway.

    Anybody want to compare those hypothetical 2 exploits in the wild to the security holocaust that exists in the Win32 world? Anybody?

    Gary wrote: "The irony is that the very pervasiveness of Win32 and its ease of compromise present a clear and present danger to Mac users."

    I reply: That's just stupid. I have 4 computers on my network, all of which are Macs. So my Macs are venerable to PC security issues? Ummm. NO.

    Gary wrote: Macs run PC software.

    I reply: Is he on drugs?

    Gary wrote: "Almost all run Microsoft Office, and they include the ubiquitous Web server and Outlook-like Entourage client.

    I reply: Almost all of them do? I have 4 macs, and one copy of office on one computer. Many do, yes... but "Almost all"? I would be interested to see where Gary gets his market share data for Office. Which particular "ubiquitous web server" is he talking about? Apache? What does this have to do with Microsoft Office? Also, most people I know do not use Entourage even if they have it installed... they use the OX X mail client, as I do. As an aside, however, I must give MS props on Mac Office... it is MUCH superior to the Win32 version, for some strange reason.

    Gary wrote: "Most importantly, they're densely interconnected to thousands and thousands of Win32 machines. Rather than being above trouble, they're surrounded by it. A clever attacker can take advantage of this Achilles' heel with cross-platform malware aimed at Win32 and Mac computers."

    I reply: I guess Gary must be talking about all those windows machines connected through the internet... because a LARGE percentage of Mac machines are stand alone or are connected only to other Macs on the jelly side of the router. My Macs are connected to Windows machines only after passing through two firewalls, minimum.

    Gary wrote: "Though there have been no confirmed sightings of cross-platform payloads targeting Win32 and OS X, it's only a matter of time before they emerge. Propagation of such malware will follow the astounding Win32 release curve, covering the planet in a matter of hours. And the "superior"--and completely surrounded--Mac users will be in for it this time."

    I reply: To quote that famous philosopher Jessica Alba during her Dark Angel days, "Blah Blah, Woof Woof".

    Seriously.

    Again, I point back to the headline of the story. "Is Your Mac Really More Secure?"

    I think a more accurate headline (if a little long) would have been "Some Day Down The Road, Could Macs Face A Tiny Fraction Of The Security Problems That Exist In The Win32 World".

    The answer to that question is yes.

    The answer to your original headline, however, is blindingly obvious to anybody who has a brain larger than a pea.











    Edited before any responses to fix a bad typo.
     
  18. macrumors 68000

    Silencio

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2002
    Location:
    NYC
    #18
    "The irony is that the very pervasiveness of Win32 and its ease of compromise present a clear and present danger to Mac users. Macs run PC software. Almost all run Microsoft Office, and they include the ubiquitous Web server and Outlook-like Entourage client. Most importantly, they're densely interconnected to thousands and thousands of Win32 machines. Rather than being above trouble, they're surrounded by it. A clever attacker can take advantage of this Achilles' heel with cross-platform malware aimed at Win32 and Mac computers."

    That's just about the dumbest thing I've ever read! So many fallacies and falsehoods, I don't have nearly enough time to go through them all. I'd call it FUD, but it's more of a complete misunderstanding of the topic at hand.
     
  19. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2005
    #19
    MacRumors.com should have some sort of project going on where a single Apple machine (let's say any G5 for speed's sake) is connected to the internet directly to a cable modem, behind no firewalls other than that which is built into OS X.

    This way we can prove beyond a reasonable doubt just how secure our systems really are.

    I wonder what would happen, then, if a designated user on that machine were to download many large files from various non-secure, dodgy websites, open emails from strange senders, and all of the remaining unthinkably stupid actions that could be performed on a Windows machine.

    Just thinking out loud, but this sure would shut the mouths of morons like this guy...
     
  20. macrumors 68020

    winmacguy

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2003
    Location:
    New Zealand
    #20
    Been done already by USA Today last year called the honey pot project
    http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/technology/2004-11-29-honeypot_x.htm
    Unprotected PCs can be hijacked in minutes 11/29/2004
     
  21. macrumors 68040

    dornoforpyros

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2004
    Location:
    Calgary, AB
    #21
    Seems me there is about 10 times more authors writing about "how OS X is a high profile target because..." then there are hackers actually attempting anything. Kinda like the terrorist that are after us in our sleep
     
  22. macrumors 68020

    winmacguy

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2003
    Location:
    New Zealand
    #22
    Thats because they're jealous:p :D
     
  23. Moderator emeritus

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2004
    #23

    Are you volunteering your time and your Mac? I'll second that nomination then.

    I'll also take away any damaged equipment that has been subjected to such an assault — it would be far too dangerous to continue using it.
     
  24. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2005
    #24
    If I was not in a position where my Mac was about the most expensive thing I own and did not have enough trouble paying for it as it is, I would. Yes.

    But to answer your question, no. :D :p
     
  25. macrumors 65816

    Photorun

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2003
    Location:
    NYC
    #25
    The only viruses OS X can get I'm aware of are, in fact, to Microsoft products, and shouldn't that be the first clue to this peecee weenie, as in, then why the F*** even USE a peecee, or Windoze peecee, get A MAC! And don't use ANYTHING Windoze.

    Microsoft Wurd has the marco virus, which is really just annoying, it certainly doesn't disable any files. And if you install VirtualPeeCee by M$, that does, in fact, get adware and spyware just like if you owned (sadly if you're so unlucky) a peecee, however the beauty is you can simply delete the folder and reinstall, you're Mac, however, will still be running fine, that'll be untouched.
     

Share This Page