Re: Here's a legitimate use
Originally posted by mstecker
Herse's a legitimate use that I use all of the time:
Often, before I go on a trip or head to the office, I'll use a program like itunesdl or islurp to browse and copy MP3 files from my "master archive" to my laptop, as I won't have access to my archive while on the road.
While I used to use smb file sharing to do the same thing, it's much nicer to use the itunes sharing.
but.... you can only transfer one file at a time that way. sure you may like to browse using the itunes interface, but... it really presses my imagination that you could prefer islurp or itunesdl so a more normal file tranfer system....
and as for p2p networks that facilitate more than just music i think this is a case of perspective. i see them as services designed for trading of illegal content that
CAN -
POSSIBLY be used for legitimate and even 'worthy' causes.
this thread is a little weird. i started on the over side of the tracks, then crossed over and i'm about to lay down how i feel about it all.
i hate censorship, really, i think it's a bad thing. i think that the people who are censoring public material have no right to be choosing. these are very general statements. there are lots of exceptions and it all depends on specific circumstances. But! my point! i have no illusions whatsoever about the reasons for the existence of p2p networks or why the internet got to be so big. it is not information as i wish i could believe. it is open access to pornography and things you would otherwise have to pay for. as the internet matures, this changes, but that is what is at the root.
trading copyrighted music is bad. using itunes to do it is bad. the fact that you can use itunesdl or islurp legitimately does not makes them legitimate by default.