iTunes 1080p Content Comes Close to Blu-ray Quality, But Can't Quite Match

Discussion in 'MacRumors.com News Discussion' started by MacRumors, Mar 14, 2012.

  1. macrumors bot

    MacRumors

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2001
    #1
    [​IMG]


    Last week, we took a look at the compression being employed by Apple with its new 1080p content on the iTunes Store, a feature that has allowed Apple to increase file sizes by only 15-25% compared to 720p even as the number of pixels have more than doubled. A number of commenters were interested in seeing how 1080p iTunes content compares to Blu-ray, and Ars Technica has now returned with a new analysis looking at the relative quality of those two sources.

    [​IMG]


    Comparison of color and detail in iTunes 1080p (left) and Blu-ray (right) formats
    The report offers a number of blown-up comparison shots, finding that the iTunes Store content generally compares fairly well to Blu-ray content, although it does struggle a bit more with bright highlights, scenes with high detail and noise levels, and dark gradients.
    [​IMG]


    Comparison of dark gradient handling in iTunes 1080p (top) and Blu-ray (bottom)
    (Brightness enhanced for clearer demonstration)
    Apple's move to 1080p video content in the iTunes Store is part of a significant shift to higher-resolution offerings, pairing the new new content with movie support for iTunes in the Cloud and new 1080p hardware in the new iPad and Apple TV set to debut on Friday.

    Article Link: iTunes 1080p Content Comes Close to Blu-ray Quality, But Can't Quite Match
     
  2. macrumors Core

    miles01110

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2006
    Location:
    The Ivory Tower (I'm not coming down)
    #2
    Apple response: "Watch it from farther away."
     
  3. macrumors G4

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2010
    #3
    This isn't surprising. It's a matter of balancing download size and screen quality. I think they have done a decent job of that.
     
  4. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2011
    #4
    Bull... I'll admit the iTMS videos look nice, but there is no way they can be compared to blu ray quality. What are the files encoded at? 3-5 Mbps? Blu rays get up to about 40Mbps! That's a huge reduction of data.
     
  5. macrumors 68020

    ugahairydawgs

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2010
    #5
    For the vast majority of people out there this will not be an issue.
     
  6. macrumors G4

    Small White Car

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2006
    Location:
    Washington DC
    #6
    Considering I gain 'get it right now' and lose 'annoying menus/trailers/FBI warnings' I consider this very slight loss of quality a very fair trade.


    I tend to rent movies instead of owning anyway...but IF I ever buy, this seems like a fair trade-off.


    The article full of screen shots seems to indicate that yes, they CAN be compared. Blu-Ray wins, sure. But the comparison is not ridiculous.
     
  7. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2006
    #7
    At 8 feet and a 50" screen I doubt most people will notice.

    Did they mention renting 1080P content?
     
  8. macrumors demi-god

    GeekLawyer

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2007
    Location:
    The post is coming from inside the house!
    #8
    So, so close.

    And who knows? With improvements with encoding and codec handling, may get closer?

    My verdict: Close enough for my 35 year-old eyes. :)
     
  9. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2005
    #9
    For me I would actually rank audio quality slightly more important than video quality. Lack of HD audio on itunes means i'll never get movies from them. Of course DRM has something to do with that as well.
     
  10. macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2008
    #10
    The other question is how does iTunes 1080P compare to VUDU 1080P HDX? I've been using VUDU instead of Apple / iTunes because it's 1080P HDX was close enough to Blu-Ray. If Apple / iTunes is no better than VUDU that's not a lot of reason to move. Not to mention VUDU / Wal-Mart allowing you to pay $5 to convert your existing Blu-Ray (even those without digital copy included) to a 1080P version that can be used with VUDU / Ultraviolet. Apple needs to offer a match service for movies.

    Likewise Apple should take the opportunity to increase the quality (and sound options) be it streaming or perhaps download only of their 1080P offerings to rival not only VUDU but Blu-Ray itself so as to lure more people away from physical media and their competitors. Now if Hollywood would even allow it that's another story.
     
  11. macrumors G5

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2009
    #11
    In darker scenes it is very obvious. Period.

    Most might not care because renting for 3.99 vs buying a blu-ray or renting one/netflixing to their house is a better option.

    But the quality is definitely obvious to those that demand the best on both video and audio fronts.
     
  12. macrumors 68020

    charlieegan3

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2012
    Location:
    U.K
    #12
    but you don't get to download a Blu-Ray movie! sync it to your devices etc
     
  13. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2006
    Location:
    Woodbury, MN
    #13
    While the video might be close to Blu-ray quality, no mention about only having DD 5.1. Having a moderately good sound system that can handle DTS-MA sounds quite a bitter better than standard DD 5.1 (in my opinion). This is why I'll still prefer buy/Redbox blu-rays.

    On the flip side, if it's a movie that I don't care so much about the sound/audio quality, I'll stick with a convenient iTunes rental on my already outdated AppleTV 2nd Gen.
     
  14. macrumors 6502

    blizaine

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2003
    #14
    this is amazing considering that the iTunes files are about 8-10 times smaller than the Blu-Rays. My guess is that from a standard viewing distance most people would not be able to distinguish. Audio could be a different story depending on how nice your speakers are.
     
  15. macrumors 68020

    charlieegan3

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2012
    Location:
    U.K
    #15
    as if Blu-ray wasn't content protected...
     
  16. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2010
    Location:
    Hawaii
    #16
    I'll take mobility, streaming and the ability to play 10 hours of movies on a plane with 90 percent quality anyday
     
  17. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2011
    #17
    Pretty good for a file under 2 gigs. (talking about tv programmes).
     
  18. macrumors 68020

    charlieegan3

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2012
    Location:
    U.K
    #18
    I think most people would:)
     
  19. macrumors 6502a

    croooow

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2004
    #19
  20. macrumors 68020

    charlieegan3

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2012
    Location:
    U.K
    #20
    how often do you stare at a dark corner though?
     
  21. macrumors 68020

    iBreatheApple

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2011
    Location:
    Florida
    #21
    I don't think anyone should really be complaining. I'm VERY impressed. The title alone praises the quality, to be honest. "Close to bluray quality"... While in digital format and in an impressively compressed file size? I feel it's a win on Apple's part. :apple:

    EXACTLY. Which is why you should be praising the quality given the reduction of data. (IMO)
     
  22. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2008
    #22
    Last week I bought some movies off iTunes that were 720p. Will Apple be offering 1080p versions of everything now, or just new stuff?
     
  23. macrumors 68040

    Lesser Evets

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2006
    #23
    I like Apple, but their video technology has been dancing to an ever-more-eccentric drummer since BluRay appeared on the scene. At least they took a large step closer to 2006 with this.

    I wish they'd offer upgrades for already-owned videos from their store.
     
  24. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2010
    Location:
    Hawaii
    #24
    its hit and miss


    Most of the Disney Titles are 1080p and I was able to download them, but title like the Lion King and Winnie the Pooh are 720p, I would guess they will all be 1080p, just takes time
     
  25. macrumors 68020

    charlieegan3

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2012
    Location:
    U.K
    #25
    some older material might get updated, however for now I think it will mainly be new content.
     

Share This Page