Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

onthat

macrumors regular
Original poster
Feb 26, 2006
178
1
Ruston, Louisiana
Since when does a media player require 174mb of active memory?
Photoshop 9 is only using 124mb...does this sound strange to anyone?
Is there any way I could free up some of that memory by changing settings?
I don't use the album art or video functions.
Can I use another media player?
 

Eraserhead

macrumors G4
Nov 3, 2005
10,434
12,250
UK
onthat said:
Can I use another media player?

You can use Songbird, though I found it to be very slow. If you have the RAM free and don't need it for other things it doesn't really matter.

FWIW on my iMac G5 (with 2GB RAM total) I'm using 70MB RAM for iTunes atm.

There aren't many (if any?) other media players for the Mac as virtually all Mac users love iTunes (it's IMO, apart from bloatiness, the best media player on any platform) so there aren't many alternatives, however you should also be able to recompile/run any linux media player I'm sure you'll find one of them that satisfies your needs.
 

Soulstorm

macrumors 68000
Feb 1, 2005
1,887
1
onthat said:
Since when does a media player require 174mb of active memory?
Photoshop 9 is only using 124mb...does this sound strange to anyone?
Is there any way I could free up some of that memory by changing settings?
I don't use the album art or video functions.
Can I use another media player?
here's what happens with iTunes:

Have you noticed the new CD Cover browser? When you view that, all your CD cover images are loaded into the RAM, thus, drawing memory. If you don't activate the CD cover browser even once, iTunes will not draw so much memory. For example, in my iMac G4, it only uses 40 mbytes. Sucky version in terms of memory management, imo.

EDIT: I just saw that you don't use the album art. Sorry. Ignore my post.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.