Jobs suggests Dell should eat his words

Discussion in 'MacBytes.com News Discussion' started by MacBytes, Jan 16, 2006.

  1. macrumors bot

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2003
    #1
  2. macrumors 68020

    combatcolin

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2004
    Location:
    Northants, UK
  3. macrumors Core

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2004
    #3
    i love the inflamitory headline that Cnet uses.

    it was a much longer article than needed really too.
    nice and short email that Jobs sent out. (he even acknowledged that things could change back just as quickly)
     
  4. macrumors 68000

    dongmin

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2002
    #4
    anything to get your hit rate up...
     
  5. mpw
    Guest

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2004
    #5
    It's headlines like that that make me hate journalists. I don’t know how many times I’ve read an article where I know I’ve only got a little knowledge on the subject but come away knowing I know more than the journalist who ‘researched’ it, and I just know that a lot of other readers will come away thinking they’ve learnt something.

    We had a front page headline in the local paper (for a community of ~90K) “Bird Flu Could Kill 650”. Now it’s not that the headline is wrong but it doesn’t say that bird flu could alternatively kill 'none' or again alternatively kill 'all'. Where is the news in that?
     
  6. Guest

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2005
    Location:
    Currently in Switzerland
    #6
    Fact is: Michael Dell is a tool and he ate some crow now...not only he said that he would shut it down and give money to shareholders, but also that he would never accept a CEO position there, as Apple was hopeless.

    Funnily, Dell is close to hopeless now, with its clunky machines and stupid philosophy...here's to the losers, Dell fanboys!
     
  7. macrumors 68030

    BenRoethig

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2002
    Location:
    Dubuque, Iowa
    #7
    If Apple had enough money, it wouldn't be too bad of an idea.
     
  8. macrumors 68040

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2004
    #8
    Yeah, they'd finally be able to sell a complete machine for under $400. Even though it would be a stripped down piece of crap, millions would buy them just cause its a dell and its under $400.
     
  9. macrumors 68030

    BenRoethig

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2002
    Location:
    Dubuque, Iowa
    #9
    That and its practical. Dell is the exact opposite of Apple: function over form.
     
  10. macrumors 65816

    faintember

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2005
    Location:
    the ruins of the Cherokee nation
    #10
    Dells function? :confused:
     
  11. Moderator emeritus

    mkrishnan

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2004
    Location:
    Grand Rapids, MI, USA
    #11
    Mmmmm, at the time that Jobs started turning Apple around, Apple was worth little more than its brand name. Which, admittedly, was probably one of the best brand names in the computing industry even then, because of all the visibility it got in the earlier heydays of the Mac, as well as the Apple ]['s that people in my generation grew up with. But they didn't have much else at that time. So I can sort of see Dell's point. But brand name is worth a lot, in addition to Jobs deserving a lot of the credit for being visionary enough to turn Apple around. I think from Mr. Dell's business acumen and mindset, for him, his solution would've been the best, because he could have done much more with Apple's market cap by starting over than by reinvigorating. I personally am glad that it was Jobs and not Dell who got the chance at the helm! :)
     

Share This Page