I have a gut feeling that if you're right, it's bad news for us (consumers)
Since we are all waiting, anybody care to talk about why there is typically no live coverage in court? I have always known about it, but just never got around to find out.
How old are you? 10?
True, but appeals are mostly about technical matters. The jury is the one and only trier of fact. Now if the judge made errors that caused the jury to screw up, that's one thing, but that's difficult to prove. Courts are very deferential to juries.
How would an Apple win be bad for consumers? It would promote individual product creativity and create more varied competition.
How would an Apple win be bad for consumers? It would promote individual product creativity and create more varied competition.
Nah, copying ideas never leads to original thought.
Yay.
Am I the only one who doesn't want either company to win?
Yay.
Am I the only one who doesn't want either company to win?
If there are multiple claims, the jury could also split the decision by deciding for apple for some claims and against samsung for other claims. I have no idea how many claims there are, but it sounds like there is just one major one.
Nah, copying ideas never leads to original thought.
This is almost as intense as moving too far from the toilet when you've got the runs.
It gives apple no reason to make the next three iPhones any different. Anyone who thinks otherwise just isn't thinking clearly.
Does the judge read the verdict, the court clerk, or the jury foreperson?