Just Got my New Powermac

Discussion in 'Macintosh Computers' started by mashinhead, Oct 26, 2005.

  1. mashinhead
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2003
    #1
    i just got a dual-core 2.0, up from a 1.67 G4. I have to say i'm really dissapointed. This computer isn't fast at all, its about the same speed as the powerbook. and the mighty mouse just sucks. I think i might sell it. does it get better with time? Plust it makes some wierd noises, which haven't notice on other g5's i use at school?
     
  2. G5Unit
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 68020

    G5Unit

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2005
    Location:
    I'm calling the cops
  3. mashinhead
    Expand Collapse
    thread starter macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2003
    #3
    512 for now, but still, it should be faster than the powerbook, right?
     
  4. mashinhead
    Expand Collapse
    thread starter macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2003
  5. jiggie2g
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 6502

    jiggie2g

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2003
    Location:
    Brooklyn,NY
    #5

    I swear I will never understand why people post redicuious stuff like this before looking at the obvious.

    "Hint" Your PowerMAc is cripple by low ram get atleast 2GB(1GBx2) if it still sucks then bitch about it. go to newegg.com get some Corsair or OCZ or Crucial ram.
     
  6. ipacmm
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 65816

    ipacmm

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2003
    Location:
    Cincinnati, OH
    #6
    Well if your powerbook had 2Gb, it would feel faster. I would install at least 2GB of ram on the Powermac and then give it a try.
     
  7. tekmoe
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2005
    #7
    what are you smokin' man? i bought the same exact one last night and it blazes!
     
  8. VanMac
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 6502a

    VanMac

    Joined:
    May 26, 2005
    Location:
    Rampaging Tokyo
    #8
    I'll give you $500 cash for it right now if your so dissappointed....
     
  9. forumBuddy
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors member

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2005
    #9
    What is it with people here throwing tons of memory down their Macs? What is it obsession, hope for the miracles - what is it? Granted I have 2.5Gb in my G5 PowerMac - but it's really overkill for everyday tasks. After observing behavior of Mac OS X, you need at most 1Gig and OS actually will be fine with even less. 512 is ok, on my machine the only time I noticed a difference is when having dashboard load while bunch of other staff is loaded. So no, he doesn't need to buy 2.5Gig to notice the difference.

    The truth is, that G4 clock for clock is really comparable to G5 performance. And even though there is faster bus, memory etc, unless you doing games, rendering in every day tasks (browsing, documents, slideshow) it will make little difference. So, assuming you went from 1.64Ghz to 2.0Ghz - there is not much difference there.

    Keep in mind though that once you start stressing system by having multiple programs running etc, you should see that PowerMac is faster simply because second processor/core comes into play.
     
  10. Macabron
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors member

    Macabron

    Joined:
    May 23, 2005
    Location:
    Durango, México.
    #10
    Have you checked if the processor setting is in highest?
    And if it is, try something that really taxes the procesor.
    Just as a test encode some video for the iPod, something with less than a minute total duration. Time it. I'm sure you will notice the difference.
     
  11. mashinhead
    Expand Collapse
    thread starter macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2003
    #11

    how do you check that
     
  12. cruxed
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors regular

    cruxed

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2005
    Location:
    Hong Kong
    #12
    All I can say is that my PowerMac beats the pants off my Mac Mini...
     
  13. mjstew33
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 601

    mjstew33

    Joined:
    May 29, 2005
    Location:
    Illinois
    #13
    well duh. :rolleyes:

    dude, you need more RAM... and no, it's not an obsession. Macs love RAM. The more you have, the better ;)

    :cool:
     
  14. TBi
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 68030

    TBi

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2005
    Location:
    Ireland
    #14
    I remember the days when Microsoft was slated because NT5 (2000) was such a memory hog. Kinda funny now that macs have the same appetite for memory.
     
  15. SuperSnake2012
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2005
    Location:
    NY
    #15
    OS X is a lot more demanding than Windows 2000 :rolleyes:
     

Share This Page