Just Got my New Powermac

Discussion in 'Macintosh Computers' started by mashinhead, Oct 26, 2005.

  1. macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2003
    Messages:
    2,301
    #1
    i just got a dual-core 2.0, up from a 1.67 G4. I have to say i'm really dissapointed. This computer isn't fast at all, its about the same speed as the powerbook. and the mighty mouse just sucks. I think i might sell it. does it get better with time? Plust it makes some wierd noises, which haven't notice on other g5's i use at school?
     
  2. macrumors 68020

    G5Unit

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2005
    Messages:
    2,095
    Location:
    I'm calling the cops
    #2
    How much ram you got in there?
     
  3. macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2003
    Messages:
    2,301
    #3
    512 for now, but still, it should be faster than the powerbook, right?
     
  4. macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2003
    Messages:
    2,301
    #4
    oh and my powerbook has 2gigs
     
  5. macrumors 6502

    jiggie2g

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2003
    Messages:
    491
    Location:
    Brooklyn,NY
    #5

    I swear I will never understand why people post redicuious stuff like this before looking at the obvious.

    "Hint" Your PowerMAc is cripple by low ram get atleast 2GB(1GBx2) if it still sucks then bitch about it. go to newegg.com get some Corsair or OCZ or Crucial ram.
     
  6. macrumors 65816

    ipacmm

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2003
    Messages:
    1,304
    Location:
    Cincinnati, OH
    #6
    Well if your powerbook had 2Gb, it would feel faster. I would install at least 2GB of ram on the Powermac and then give it a try.
     
  7. macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2005
    Messages:
    1,536
    #7
    what are you smokin' man? i bought the same exact one last night and it blazes!
     
  8. macrumors 6502a

    VanMac

    Joined:
    May 26, 2005
    Messages:
    913
    Location:
    Rampaging Tokyo
    #8
    I'll give you $500 cash for it right now if your so dissappointed....
     
  9. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2005
    Messages:
    61
    #9
    What is it with people here throwing tons of memory down their Macs? What is it obsession, hope for the miracles - what is it? Granted I have 2.5Gb in my G5 PowerMac - but it's really overkill for everyday tasks. After observing behavior of Mac OS X, you need at most 1Gig and OS actually will be fine with even less. 512 is ok, on my machine the only time I noticed a difference is when having dashboard load while bunch of other staff is loaded. So no, he doesn't need to buy 2.5Gig to notice the difference.

    The truth is, that G4 clock for clock is really comparable to G5 performance. And even though there is faster bus, memory etc, unless you doing games, rendering in every day tasks (browsing, documents, slideshow) it will make little difference. So, assuming you went from 1.64Ghz to 2.0Ghz - there is not much difference there.

    Keep in mind though that once you start stressing system by having multiple programs running etc, you should see that PowerMac is faster simply because second processor/core comes into play.
     
  10. macrumors member

    Macabron

    Joined:
    May 23, 2005
    Messages:
    42
    Location:
    Durango, México.
    #10
    Have you checked if the processor setting is in highest?
    And if it is, try something that really taxes the procesor.
    Just as a test encode some video for the iPod, something with less than a minute total duration. Time it. I'm sure you will notice the difference.
     
  11. macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2003
    Messages:
    2,301
    #11

    how do you check that
     
  12. macrumors regular

    cruxed

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2005
    Messages:
    244
    Location:
    Hong Kong
    #12
    All I can say is that my PowerMac beats the pants off my Mac Mini...
     
  13. macrumors 601

    mjstew33

    Joined:
    May 29, 2005
    Messages:
    4,223
    Location:
    Illinois
    #13
    well duh. :rolleyes:

    dude, you need more RAM... and no, it's not an obsession. Macs love RAM. The more you have, the better ;)

    :cool:
     
  14. TBi
    macrumors 68030

    TBi

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2005
    Messages:
    2,579
    Location:
    Ireland
    #14
    I remember the days when Microsoft was slated because NT5 (2000) was such a memory hog. Kinda funny now that macs have the same appetite for memory.
     
  15. macrumors 6502a

    SuperSnake2012

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2005
    Messages:
    807
    Location:
    NY/PA
    #15
    OS X is a lot more demanding than Windows 2000 :rolleyes:
     

Share This Page