Just installed Paralells on my macbook!!

Discussion in 'Windows, Linux & Others on the Mac' started by deepy, Sep 20, 2006.

  1. deepy macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2006
    #1
    Woahhh I just installed Parallels on my macbook with windows xp sp2....wow!!

    Makes me actually *like* windows again because its running within mac os lol. Its so smooth and nice!

    How well will it run NFS Most Wanted? lol i'm installing it now but its taking forever because its doing it via CD images on my pc over wireless. Mind you, I only havve 512mb of RAM so i'm guessing it'll be rubbish lol.
     
  2. sushi Moderator emeritus

    sushi

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2002
    Location:
    キャンプスワ&#
    #2
    Yes it is! ;)
     
  3. almonde macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2006
    Location:
    Houston, TX
    #3
    I think the 3d acceleration in Parallels is experimental to non existent at the moment. So it probably won't run.
     
  4. deepy thread starter macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2006
    #4

    Too right!
     
  5. MRU macrumors demi-god

    MRU

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2005
    Location:
    Ireland
    #5
    The next version of Parallels will apparently support GPU acceleration. That should be 'sweeeeeeet' :)
     
  6. Mitthrawnuruodo Moderator emeritus

    Mitthrawnuruodo

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2004
    Location:
    Bergen, Norway
    #6
    I just love the ultimate irony in running Windows in a window... :D
     
  7. yoda13 macrumors 65816

    yoda13

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2003
    Location:
    Texas
    #7
    Whoever thought us Mac users would get so excited about running Windows on our machines.:D
     
  8. georgi0 macrumors regular

    georgi0

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2006
    Location:
    Cyberspace
  9. Abulia macrumors 68000

    Abulia

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2004
    Location:
    Kushiel's Scion
    #9
    Personally, I think it'll be 'barely acceptable.'

    GPU rendering in a virtual environment with the OS overhead of two OSes != good performance.
     
  10. Shadow macrumors 68000

    Shadow

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2006
    Location:
    Keele, United Kingdom
    #10
    Meh. Parallels uses too much RAM, even when I told it not too. Its too slow, and its Windows (I dont have/want a Linux install disk-got XGL 0.2 though:cool: ).
     
  11. BSME macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2006
    #11
    it's a beautiful solution to running office 2003.

    i was trying out open office, and it just isn't the same...
     
  12. Gosh macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2006
    #12
    Yes it makes XP subordinate to OS X - rather than its equal as in Boot Camp - my thinking anyway!

    The other more unfortunate irony is of course a Mac user paying out for Windows!

    Let's hope he doesn't pay out for MS Office and uses equally good OpenOffice in XP or NeoOffice in OS X!
     
  13. BSME macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2006
    #13
    i have to argue that point.

    i had tried to adapt to using both openoffice and neooffice, and neither one can match the quality of MS Office. i can see either being decent enough for one who would rather not spend the money, but if you've got the cash and want a superior program, nothing out right now tops Office 2003...
     
  14. 4np macrumors 6502a

    4np

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2005
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    #14
    Is it actually possible to use the same windows partition with both parallels and bootcamp? It would be nice to boot into bootcamp for gaming or use parallels for other applications that don't require extensive directx usage...
     
  15. balamw Moderator

    balamw

    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2005
    Location:
    New England
    #15
    No you can't. You can however mount your Boot Camp partition from within Parallels which would allow you to potentially cut down on the files thet need to be in your Parallels VM.

    B
     
  16. Gosh macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2006
    #16
    I'm no pro user of office software but I find Open/NeoOffice more than ample. Excel has nothing on Calc and Writer is pretty much as good as Word. Saving to pdf and Open Document formats (as well as MS Office formats) feels like being on the winning side of a world war - or at least the just side! MS Office has familiarity on its side becuase we all get indoctrinated with it from an early age!

    I respect your pov though!
     
  17. 4np macrumors 6502a

    4np

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2005
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    #17
    Hmm bummer.... And how is a Parallels VM installed? Is the WM's 'harddrive' contained in one big file or is it on seperate partition?
     
  18. Josias macrumors 68000

    Josias

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2006
    #18
    Grrr! I tried to get FireFox in Windows XP (Bootcamp) on my MacBook, but IE 6 keeps crashing.

    I still don't like Windows.

    However, my MacBook can give me more than 30 fps at 640x480 in Halo at lowest settings, and a good 20 fps at 1280x800 at lowest settings. Haven't tried 1280x800 at highest settings...:D
     
  19. bankshot macrumors 65816

    bankshot

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2003
    Location:
    Southern California
    #19
    Out of curiosity, how is it too slow for you? I've been running it for a few months now (2.0 GHz Macbook, 2 GB RAM) and it screams in every guest OS I've given it. 3-D graphics is the one serious bottleneck as everyone knows, but that doesn't affect me too much as I do primarily software development and compatibility testing. Near as I can tell, most of that stuff runs pretty darn close to native speed.
     
  20. balamw Moderator

    balamw

    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2005
    Location:
    New England
    #20
    One file, which can be on an external drive. It's pretty good about keeping the size to the absolute minimum required storing only the bits with data in them.

    B
     
  21. bankshot macrumors 65816

    bankshot

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2003
    Location:
    Southern California
    #21
    It's one big file per virtual hard disk. Rumor has it they're working on being able to boot directly off of a separate partition so that users can keep the same install for both Bootcamp and Parallels, but it's not there yet.

    Bah, beaten by one minute! :rolleyes:
     
  22. 4np macrumors 6502a

    4np

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2005
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    #22
    So it can also be on a SMB share? ;) Anybody tried that? :) It's probably pretty slow I guess...
     
  23. Am3822 macrumors 6502

    Am3822

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2006
    Location:
    Groningen, The Netherlands
    #23
    Parallels question

    How do I transfer files between the parallels-hosted OS (XP/linux/2K) and OS X? Is it a simple drag and drop thing? Is there a way to transfer files between the parallels guest OS and OS X? Some sort of internal networking between the two operating systems, perhaps?
     
  24. Gosh macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2006
    #24
    There's a Shared folder (or folders) for your files! You can drop n' drag text though between OS's. Also if you have a dotMac account there is an iDisk utility for XP which works really well - I like it more than accessing iDisk via OS X!
     
  25. BSME macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2006
    #25

    i completely agree regarding the PDF issue (which is why i've still got openoffice installed), and can't comment on Calc vs. Excel, but i found Writer to be quirky, wanting to finish my words if it thought i was writing something longer, and the spell check function needs some work.

    for what it is, it's definitely more than adequate, there's just so much more behind the MS Office products that you can't ignore them, regardless of cost.
     

Share This Page